Cargando…

Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Enormous advances in treating/curing patients suffering from Hepatitis C (HepC) infection have occurred; resulting in many states mandating screening for HepC for older individuals. Unfortunately, no protection of screening exists for newborns. In Kentucky, rates of HepC among pregnant w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myers, John, Smith, Michael, Espinosa, Claudia, Woods, Charles, Duncan, Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631874/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.098
_version_ 1783269579982635008
author Myers, John
Smith, Michael
Espinosa, Claudia
Woods, Charles
Duncan, Scott
author_facet Myers, John
Smith, Michael
Espinosa, Claudia
Woods, Charles
Duncan, Scott
author_sort Myers, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enormous advances in treating/curing patients suffering from Hepatitis C (HepC) infection have occurred; resulting in many states mandating screening for HepC for older individuals. Unfortunately, no protection of screening exists for newborns. In Kentucky, rates of HepC among pregnant women are the second highest within the U.S., which has been associated to high intravenous drug use. Infants born to those women are at risk of HepC infection and other conditions such as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). The current study examined the rate of HepC screening in a high-risk cohort (newborns suffering from NAS) and it’s impact on policy-making for this vulnerable population. METHODS: Kentucky Medicaid records, from 2015, were obtained to develop a detailed demographic, behavioral, clinical, and diagnostic data set (n = 152,749). NAS was defined by ICD-9 code 779.5 and ICD-10 code P96.1. HepC screening was defined by CPT codes (CPT 87520 [HCV, direct probe], 87521 [HCV, amplified probe], and 87522 [HCV RNA, Quantitative] or antibody [CPTs 86803–4]). Initially a descriptive study was performed, then multiple logistic regression techniques were used to test what variables impacted the odds of not being screened for HepC. RESULTS: A total of 1234 newborns with NAS were identified. The majority showed signs of NAS within 24 hours (64%), were white (68%) and were admitted to the hospital for an average of 24.8 days. Only one-in-three newborns with NAS (n = 412, 33.4%) were screened for HepC. Non-Whites (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.45–1.71, P < 0.001) and those living in non-urban areas (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.28–1.56, P < 0.001) were the only study variables to significantly impact the odds of not being screened for HepC (for newborns suffering from NAS). CONCLUSION: A high-risk and vulnerable population for HepC may not be getting screened for HepC and thus are being underserved by the health care system. Non-Whites and those in rural areas are the most affected. Solutions and policies need to be focused on this population and area where screening is lacking. Optimization of maternal screening for HepC is crucial in high-risk populations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56318742017-11-07 Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? Myers, John Smith, Michael Espinosa, Claudia Woods, Charles Duncan, Scott Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Enormous advances in treating/curing patients suffering from Hepatitis C (HepC) infection have occurred; resulting in many states mandating screening for HepC for older individuals. Unfortunately, no protection of screening exists for newborns. In Kentucky, rates of HepC among pregnant women are the second highest within the U.S., which has been associated to high intravenous drug use. Infants born to those women are at risk of HepC infection and other conditions such as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). The current study examined the rate of HepC screening in a high-risk cohort (newborns suffering from NAS) and it’s impact on policy-making for this vulnerable population. METHODS: Kentucky Medicaid records, from 2015, were obtained to develop a detailed demographic, behavioral, clinical, and diagnostic data set (n = 152,749). NAS was defined by ICD-9 code 779.5 and ICD-10 code P96.1. HepC screening was defined by CPT codes (CPT 87520 [HCV, direct probe], 87521 [HCV, amplified probe], and 87522 [HCV RNA, Quantitative] or antibody [CPTs 86803–4]). Initially a descriptive study was performed, then multiple logistic regression techniques were used to test what variables impacted the odds of not being screened for HepC. RESULTS: A total of 1234 newborns with NAS were identified. The majority showed signs of NAS within 24 hours (64%), were white (68%) and were admitted to the hospital for an average of 24.8 days. Only one-in-three newborns with NAS (n = 412, 33.4%) were screened for HepC. Non-Whites (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.45–1.71, P < 0.001) and those living in non-urban areas (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.28–1.56, P < 0.001) were the only study variables to significantly impact the odds of not being screened for HepC (for newborns suffering from NAS). CONCLUSION: A high-risk and vulnerable population for HepC may not be getting screened for HepC and thus are being underserved by the health care system. Non-Whites and those in rural areas are the most affected. Solutions and policies need to be focused on this population and area where screening is lacking. Optimization of maternal screening for HepC is crucial in high-risk populations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631874/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.098 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Myers, John
Smith, Michael
Espinosa, Claudia
Woods, Charles
Duncan, Scott
Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?
title Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?
title_full Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?
title_fullStr Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?
title_full_unstemmed Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?
title_short Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?
title_sort is there failure to screen for hepatitis c in newborns suffering from neonatal abstinence syndrome?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631874/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.098
work_keys_str_mv AT myersjohn istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT smithmichael istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT espinosaclaudia istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT woodscharles istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT duncanscott istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome