Cargando…
Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?
BACKGROUND: Enormous advances in treating/curing patients suffering from Hepatitis C (HepC) infection have occurred; resulting in many states mandating screening for HepC for older individuals. Unfortunately, no protection of screening exists for newborns. In Kentucky, rates of HepC among pregnant w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631874/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.098 |
_version_ | 1783269579982635008 |
---|---|
author | Myers, John Smith, Michael Espinosa, Claudia Woods, Charles Duncan, Scott |
author_facet | Myers, John Smith, Michael Espinosa, Claudia Woods, Charles Duncan, Scott |
author_sort | Myers, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enormous advances in treating/curing patients suffering from Hepatitis C (HepC) infection have occurred; resulting in many states mandating screening for HepC for older individuals. Unfortunately, no protection of screening exists for newborns. In Kentucky, rates of HepC among pregnant women are the second highest within the U.S., which has been associated to high intravenous drug use. Infants born to those women are at risk of HepC infection and other conditions such as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). The current study examined the rate of HepC screening in a high-risk cohort (newborns suffering from NAS) and it’s impact on policy-making for this vulnerable population. METHODS: Kentucky Medicaid records, from 2015, were obtained to develop a detailed demographic, behavioral, clinical, and diagnostic data set (n = 152,749). NAS was defined by ICD-9 code 779.5 and ICD-10 code P96.1. HepC screening was defined by CPT codes (CPT 87520 [HCV, direct probe], 87521 [HCV, amplified probe], and 87522 [HCV RNA, Quantitative] or antibody [CPTs 86803–4]). Initially a descriptive study was performed, then multiple logistic regression techniques were used to test what variables impacted the odds of not being screened for HepC. RESULTS: A total of 1234 newborns with NAS were identified. The majority showed signs of NAS within 24 hours (64%), were white (68%) and were admitted to the hospital for an average of 24.8 days. Only one-in-three newborns with NAS (n = 412, 33.4%) were screened for HepC. Non-Whites (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.45–1.71, P < 0.001) and those living in non-urban areas (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.28–1.56, P < 0.001) were the only study variables to significantly impact the odds of not being screened for HepC (for newborns suffering from NAS). CONCLUSION: A high-risk and vulnerable population for HepC may not be getting screened for HepC and thus are being underserved by the health care system. Non-Whites and those in rural areas are the most affected. Solutions and policies need to be focused on this population and area where screening is lacking. Optimization of maternal screening for HepC is crucial in high-risk populations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5631874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56318742017-11-07 Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? Myers, John Smith, Michael Espinosa, Claudia Woods, Charles Duncan, Scott Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Enormous advances in treating/curing patients suffering from Hepatitis C (HepC) infection have occurred; resulting in many states mandating screening for HepC for older individuals. Unfortunately, no protection of screening exists for newborns. In Kentucky, rates of HepC among pregnant women are the second highest within the U.S., which has been associated to high intravenous drug use. Infants born to those women are at risk of HepC infection and other conditions such as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). The current study examined the rate of HepC screening in a high-risk cohort (newborns suffering from NAS) and it’s impact on policy-making for this vulnerable population. METHODS: Kentucky Medicaid records, from 2015, were obtained to develop a detailed demographic, behavioral, clinical, and diagnostic data set (n = 152,749). NAS was defined by ICD-9 code 779.5 and ICD-10 code P96.1. HepC screening was defined by CPT codes (CPT 87520 [HCV, direct probe], 87521 [HCV, amplified probe], and 87522 [HCV RNA, Quantitative] or antibody [CPTs 86803–4]). Initially a descriptive study was performed, then multiple logistic regression techniques were used to test what variables impacted the odds of not being screened for HepC. RESULTS: A total of 1234 newborns with NAS were identified. The majority showed signs of NAS within 24 hours (64%), were white (68%) and were admitted to the hospital for an average of 24.8 days. Only one-in-three newborns with NAS (n = 412, 33.4%) were screened for HepC. Non-Whites (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.45–1.71, P < 0.001) and those living in non-urban areas (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.28–1.56, P < 0.001) were the only study variables to significantly impact the odds of not being screened for HepC (for newborns suffering from NAS). CONCLUSION: A high-risk and vulnerable population for HepC may not be getting screened for HepC and thus are being underserved by the health care system. Non-Whites and those in rural areas are the most affected. Solutions and policies need to be focused on this population and area where screening is lacking. Optimization of maternal screening for HepC is crucial in high-risk populations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631874/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.098 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Myers, John Smith, Michael Espinosa, Claudia Woods, Charles Duncan, Scott Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? |
title | Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? |
title_full | Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? |
title_fullStr | Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? |
title_short | Is there Failure to Screen for Hepatitis C in Newborns Suffering from Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome? |
title_sort | is there failure to screen for hepatitis c in newborns suffering from neonatal abstinence syndrome? |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631874/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT myersjohn istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome AT smithmichael istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome AT espinosaclaudia istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome AT woodscharles istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome AT duncanscott istherefailuretoscreenforhepatitiscinnewbornssufferingfromneonatalabstinencesyndrome |