Cargando…

Septic Arthritis of Native Joints: Are Outcomes Better with Medical or Surgical Management?

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence to support medical vs. surgical management of native joint septic arthritis (SA) with no established guidelines for care. Advantages of medical (antibiotics with or without serial needle aspiration) and surgical (arthroscopic or arthrotomic drainage) treatments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McConnell, Ian, Baghban, Adam, Holleck, Jurgen, Gupta, Shaili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631936/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.058
_version_ 1783269594857734144
author McConnell, Ian
Baghban, Adam
Holleck, Jurgen
Gupta, Shaili
author_facet McConnell, Ian
Baghban, Adam
Holleck, Jurgen
Gupta, Shaili
author_sort McConnell, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence to support medical vs. surgical management of native joint septic arthritis (SA) with no established guidelines for care. Advantages of medical (antibiotics with or without serial needle aspiration) and surgical (arthroscopic or arthrotomic drainage) treatments are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of veterans diagnosed with SA over 10 years at the West Haven VA Hospital. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and outcome data were extracted. Cases meeting inclusion criteria (positive culture or synovial fluid WBC >50,000) were stratified by surgical vs. medical management. Evaluated outcomes included joint recovery, time to recovery, sterilization of synovial fluid, duration of antibiotics, length of stay, recurrence of SA, and mortality. Odds ratios were calculated by multivariate analyses for correlation of outcomes to risk factors and to management approach taken. RESULTS: Sixty-one cases of SA met inclusion criteria. Average age was 67, 95% of patients were men, 89% White, 11% Black, 43% diabetic, and 43% had preexisting joint disease. 69% (41/61) of cases were managed surgically. Average length of stay for surgical group was 20 days compared with 14 days for medical group (P = 0.28). Duration of antibiotics was longer in surgical group (60.3) than medical group (35.4), (P = 0.09). S. aureus was the most common pathogen isolated (56%), followed by Streptococcus (11%) and gram-negative organisms (8%). Six (10%) patients had culture-negative SA. Mortality rate at 1 year was 3.2%. Full recovery of joint function at 1 year was achieved equally in both groups (P = 1.0), by 15/20 medically managed (75%) and 31/41 surgically managed (76%), with no significant differences by pathogen. Full recovery at 3 months was noted in 10/20 (50%) medically managed vs. 8/41 (19.5%) surgically managed (P = 0.02). Poor outcomes were not associated with joint location, pathogen, type of joint drainage, number of days to OR, or duration of antibiotics. Blacks had increased odds of poor outcome (OR 9.5; 95% CI 1.3–65.4). CONCLUSION: We detected no statistically significant difference in outcomes at 12 months between patients managed medically vs. surgically for native joint septic arthritis. Full recovery at 3 months was significantly higher among the medical group. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56319362017-11-07 Septic Arthritis of Native Joints: Are Outcomes Better with Medical or Surgical Management? McConnell, Ian Baghban, Adam Holleck, Jurgen Gupta, Shaili Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence to support medical vs. surgical management of native joint septic arthritis (SA) with no established guidelines for care. Advantages of medical (antibiotics with or without serial needle aspiration) and surgical (arthroscopic or arthrotomic drainage) treatments are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of veterans diagnosed with SA over 10 years at the West Haven VA Hospital. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and outcome data were extracted. Cases meeting inclusion criteria (positive culture or synovial fluid WBC >50,000) were stratified by surgical vs. medical management. Evaluated outcomes included joint recovery, time to recovery, sterilization of synovial fluid, duration of antibiotics, length of stay, recurrence of SA, and mortality. Odds ratios were calculated by multivariate analyses for correlation of outcomes to risk factors and to management approach taken. RESULTS: Sixty-one cases of SA met inclusion criteria. Average age was 67, 95% of patients were men, 89% White, 11% Black, 43% diabetic, and 43% had preexisting joint disease. 69% (41/61) of cases were managed surgically. Average length of stay for surgical group was 20 days compared with 14 days for medical group (P = 0.28). Duration of antibiotics was longer in surgical group (60.3) than medical group (35.4), (P = 0.09). S. aureus was the most common pathogen isolated (56%), followed by Streptococcus (11%) and gram-negative organisms (8%). Six (10%) patients had culture-negative SA. Mortality rate at 1 year was 3.2%. Full recovery of joint function at 1 year was achieved equally in both groups (P = 1.0), by 15/20 medically managed (75%) and 31/41 surgically managed (76%), with no significant differences by pathogen. Full recovery at 3 months was noted in 10/20 (50%) medically managed vs. 8/41 (19.5%) surgically managed (P = 0.02). Poor outcomes were not associated with joint location, pathogen, type of joint drainage, number of days to OR, or duration of antibiotics. Blacks had increased odds of poor outcome (OR 9.5; 95% CI 1.3–65.4). CONCLUSION: We detected no statistically significant difference in outcomes at 12 months between patients managed medically vs. surgically for native joint septic arthritis. Full recovery at 3 months was significantly higher among the medical group. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631936/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.058 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
McConnell, Ian
Baghban, Adam
Holleck, Jurgen
Gupta, Shaili
Septic Arthritis of Native Joints: Are Outcomes Better with Medical or Surgical Management?
title Septic Arthritis of Native Joints: Are Outcomes Better with Medical or Surgical Management?
title_full Septic Arthritis of Native Joints: Are Outcomes Better with Medical or Surgical Management?
title_fullStr Septic Arthritis of Native Joints: Are Outcomes Better with Medical or Surgical Management?
title_full_unstemmed Septic Arthritis of Native Joints: Are Outcomes Better with Medical or Surgical Management?
title_short Septic Arthritis of Native Joints: Are Outcomes Better with Medical or Surgical Management?
title_sort septic arthritis of native joints: are outcomes better with medical or surgical management?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631936/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.058
work_keys_str_mv AT mcconnellian septicarthritisofnativejointsareoutcomesbetterwithmedicalorsurgicalmanagement
AT baghbanadam septicarthritisofnativejointsareoutcomesbetterwithmedicalorsurgicalmanagement
AT holleckjurgen septicarthritisofnativejointsareoutcomesbetterwithmedicalorsurgicalmanagement
AT guptashaili septicarthritisofnativejointsareoutcomesbetterwithmedicalorsurgicalmanagement