Cargando…

Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay

BACKGROUND: From 2014 to 2015, the syphilis rate in the United States increased by 19%, reaching its highest rate since 1994. Currently, point-of-care syphilis assays use fingerstick or venipuncture whole blood to identify Treponema pallidum (TP) antibodies by qualitative immunoassay. However, patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shannon, Chelsea, Bristow, Claire, De Cortina, Sasha Herbst, Chang, Jennifer, Klausner, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631948/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.107
_version_ 1783269597776969728
author Shannon, Chelsea
Bristow, Claire
De Cortina, Sasha Herbst
Chang, Jennifer
Klausner, Jeffrey
author_facet Shannon, Chelsea
Bristow, Claire
De Cortina, Sasha Herbst
Chang, Jennifer
Klausner, Jeffrey
author_sort Shannon, Chelsea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: From 2014 to 2015, the syphilis rate in the United States increased by 19%, reaching its highest rate since 1994. Currently, point-of-care syphilis assays use fingerstick or venipuncture whole blood to identify Treponema pallidum (TP) antibodies by qualitative immunoassay. However, patients and providers prefer oral fluid testing to whole blood testing. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a rapid syphilis test intended for use on whole blood could be used to detect TP antibodies in oral fluid. METHODS: Oral fluid was collected from 72 participants using the Super•SAL™ Oral Fluid Collection Device (Oasis Diagnostics®, Vancouver, WA). The device uses an absorbent cylindrical pad to collect and filter ~1 mlml of oral fluid. Oral fluid filtrate was tested using the SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 rapid test (Alere Diagnostics, MA) following manufacturer directions for whole blood. TP particle agglutination (TPPA) and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) results derived from participants’ medical records were used as reference values. We used three different definitions as comparators: 1: TPPA reactive; 2: TPPA and RPR reactive and 3: TPPA reactive and RPR titer >1:4. Those with non-reactive TPPA and RPR results were considered seronegative. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for definition 1 and sensitivity for definitions 2 and 3. We used the exact binomial method to determine 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: With definitions 1, 2, and 3, respectively, sensitivity was 83.3% (CI: 67.2, 93.6), 86.4% (CI: 65.1, 97.1), and 100% (CI: 71.5, 100). Specificity was 47.2% (CI: 36.5, 75.5). CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity of the SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 test using oral fluid suggests a strong potential for the development of accurate rapid oral syphilis tests. Sensitivity increased with higher RPR titer. False positive results may be due to the presence of non-venereal treponemal antibodies in oral fluid. Further research and development are needed to optimize specificity. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5631948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56319482017-11-07 Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay Shannon, Chelsea Bristow, Claire De Cortina, Sasha Herbst Chang, Jennifer Klausner, Jeffrey Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: From 2014 to 2015, the syphilis rate in the United States increased by 19%, reaching its highest rate since 1994. Currently, point-of-care syphilis assays use fingerstick or venipuncture whole blood to identify Treponema pallidum (TP) antibodies by qualitative immunoassay. However, patients and providers prefer oral fluid testing to whole blood testing. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a rapid syphilis test intended for use on whole blood could be used to detect TP antibodies in oral fluid. METHODS: Oral fluid was collected from 72 participants using the Super•SAL™ Oral Fluid Collection Device (Oasis Diagnostics®, Vancouver, WA). The device uses an absorbent cylindrical pad to collect and filter ~1 mlml of oral fluid. Oral fluid filtrate was tested using the SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 rapid test (Alere Diagnostics, MA) following manufacturer directions for whole blood. TP particle agglutination (TPPA) and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) results derived from participants’ medical records were used as reference values. We used three different definitions as comparators: 1: TPPA reactive; 2: TPPA and RPR reactive and 3: TPPA reactive and RPR titer >1:4. Those with non-reactive TPPA and RPR results were considered seronegative. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for definition 1 and sensitivity for definitions 2 and 3. We used the exact binomial method to determine 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: With definitions 1, 2, and 3, respectively, sensitivity was 83.3% (CI: 67.2, 93.6), 86.4% (CI: 65.1, 97.1), and 100% (CI: 71.5, 100). Specificity was 47.2% (CI: 36.5, 75.5). CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity of the SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 test using oral fluid suggests a strong potential for the development of accurate rapid oral syphilis tests. Sensitivity increased with higher RPR titer. False positive results may be due to the presence of non-venereal treponemal antibodies in oral fluid. Further research and development are needed to optimize specificity. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5631948/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.107 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Shannon, Chelsea
Bristow, Claire
De Cortina, Sasha Herbst
Chang, Jennifer
Klausner, Jeffrey
Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay
title Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay
title_full Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay
title_fullStr Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay
title_full_unstemmed Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay
title_short Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay
title_sort use of oral fluid in a rapid syphilis test assay
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5631948/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.107
work_keys_str_mv AT shannonchelsea useoforalfluidinarapidsyphilistestassay
AT bristowclaire useoforalfluidinarapidsyphilistestassay
AT decortinasashaherbst useoforalfluidinarapidsyphilistestassay
AT changjennifer useoforalfluidinarapidsyphilistestassay
AT klausnerjeffrey useoforalfluidinarapidsyphilistestassay