Cargando…

Risk Factors Predicting Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection

BACKGROUND: Increased incidence of Candida glabrata (CG) infection is a growing concern in recent years due to the higher rates of fluconazole resistance associated with C. glabrata . This study aimed to create a risk predictive model for C. glabrata in patients with culture-positive candidemia. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Halloran, Jane, Kronen, Ryan, Lin, Charlotte, Hsueh, Kevin, Powderly, William, Spec, Andrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632078/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.009
_version_ 1783269628917579776
author O’Halloran, Jane
Kronen, Ryan
Lin, Charlotte
Hsueh, Kevin
Powderly, William
Spec, Andrej
author_facet O’Halloran, Jane
Kronen, Ryan
Lin, Charlotte
Hsueh, Kevin
Powderly, William
Spec, Andrej
author_sort O’Halloran, Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increased incidence of Candida glabrata (CG) infection is a growing concern in recent years due to the higher rates of fluconazole resistance associated with C. glabrata . This study aimed to create a risk predictive model for C. glabrata in patients with culture-positive candidemia. METHODS: Demographic data, risk factors, laboratory parameters, and outcomes were retrospectively collected on all cases of candidemia occurring at a large tertiary referral hospital between January 2002 and January 2015. Between-group differences were compared using (2) square tests. A risk predictive model was built using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 1,913 subjects with candidemia, 398 (21%) had C. glabrata isolated. Those with C. glabrata were older (mean [SD] 61 [23] vs. 58 [23] years; P < 0.001) and more often female (231 (58%) vs. 681 (45%); P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, age (OR 1.01 [95% CI 1.01,1.02]), gender (0.6 [0.5, 0.7]), history of rectal cancer (2.00 [1.2, 3.5]), other GI malignancy (3.0 [1.5, 6.2]), breast cancer (1.8 [1.1, 3.0]), enteral and parenteral feeding (1.9 [1.2, 3.2]), bowel resection (3.0 [1.4, 6.2]), temperature (0.9 [0.8, 1.0], recent fluconazole use (2.0 [1.4, 2.9]), and The presence of urinary catheter (2.3 [1.4, 3.6]), central line (1.4 [1.1, 1.7) or ventilator (2.2 [1.3, 3.8]) were all associated with C. glabrata infection (P < 0.05) and included in the multivariate modeling. Age, gender, history of rectal malignancy, other GI malignancies, use of enteral or parenteral feeding and recent fluconazole use remained significant (effect size 1.2 [95% CI 1.1, 1.3]; 1.8 [1.4, 2.3]; 2.0 [1.1, 3.6]; 3.0 [1.3, 6.9]; 1.9 [1.0, 3.3]; 2.0 [1.3, 3.0], respectively). The final model had a c-statistic of 0.66 [95% CI 0.63–0.69]). Ninety-day mortality in the C. glabrata group was not significantly different from the non-C. glabrata group (40% (158/398) vs. 42.5% (644/1515). CONCLUSION: Underlying bowel pathology was more commonly associated with C. glabrata candidemia than with other candida species. Further exploration of the direct association between C. glabrata and GI malignancy and indirect effects of prior surgery or antifungal use on risk of C. glabrata candidemia are required. Interestingly, mortality did not differ between groups with glabrata and non-glabrata candida blood stream infections. This may reflect increasing empiric use of echinocandin therapy. DISCLOSURES: A. Spec, Astellas Pharma US, Inc.: Grant Investigator, Research grant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56320782017-11-07 Risk Factors Predicting Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection O’Halloran, Jane Kronen, Ryan Lin, Charlotte Hsueh, Kevin Powderly, William Spec, Andrej Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Increased incidence of Candida glabrata (CG) infection is a growing concern in recent years due to the higher rates of fluconazole resistance associated with C. glabrata . This study aimed to create a risk predictive model for C. glabrata in patients with culture-positive candidemia. METHODS: Demographic data, risk factors, laboratory parameters, and outcomes were retrospectively collected on all cases of candidemia occurring at a large tertiary referral hospital between January 2002 and January 2015. Between-group differences were compared using (2) square tests. A risk predictive model was built using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 1,913 subjects with candidemia, 398 (21%) had C. glabrata isolated. Those with C. glabrata were older (mean [SD] 61 [23] vs. 58 [23] years; P < 0.001) and more often female (231 (58%) vs. 681 (45%); P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, age (OR 1.01 [95% CI 1.01,1.02]), gender (0.6 [0.5, 0.7]), history of rectal cancer (2.00 [1.2, 3.5]), other GI malignancy (3.0 [1.5, 6.2]), breast cancer (1.8 [1.1, 3.0]), enteral and parenteral feeding (1.9 [1.2, 3.2]), bowel resection (3.0 [1.4, 6.2]), temperature (0.9 [0.8, 1.0], recent fluconazole use (2.0 [1.4, 2.9]), and The presence of urinary catheter (2.3 [1.4, 3.6]), central line (1.4 [1.1, 1.7) or ventilator (2.2 [1.3, 3.8]) were all associated with C. glabrata infection (P < 0.05) and included in the multivariate modeling. Age, gender, history of rectal malignancy, other GI malignancies, use of enteral or parenteral feeding and recent fluconazole use remained significant (effect size 1.2 [95% CI 1.1, 1.3]; 1.8 [1.4, 2.3]; 2.0 [1.1, 3.6]; 3.0 [1.3, 6.9]; 1.9 [1.0, 3.3]; 2.0 [1.3, 3.0], respectively). The final model had a c-statistic of 0.66 [95% CI 0.63–0.69]). Ninety-day mortality in the C. glabrata group was not significantly different from the non-C. glabrata group (40% (158/398) vs. 42.5% (644/1515). CONCLUSION: Underlying bowel pathology was more commonly associated with C. glabrata candidemia than with other candida species. Further exploration of the direct association between C. glabrata and GI malignancy and indirect effects of prior surgery or antifungal use on risk of C. glabrata candidemia are required. Interestingly, mortality did not differ between groups with glabrata and non-glabrata candida blood stream infections. This may reflect increasing empiric use of echinocandin therapy. DISCLOSURES: A. Spec, Astellas Pharma US, Inc.: Grant Investigator, Research grant Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5632078/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.009 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
O’Halloran, Jane
Kronen, Ryan
Lin, Charlotte
Hsueh, Kevin
Powderly, William
Spec, Andrej
Risk Factors Predicting Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection
title Risk Factors Predicting Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection
title_full Risk Factors Predicting Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection
title_fullStr Risk Factors Predicting Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors Predicting Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection
title_short Risk Factors Predicting Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection
title_sort risk factors predicting candida glabrata bloodstream infection
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632078/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.009
work_keys_str_mv AT ohalloranjane riskfactorspredictingcandidaglabratabloodstreaminfection
AT kronenryan riskfactorspredictingcandidaglabratabloodstreaminfection
AT lincharlotte riskfactorspredictingcandidaglabratabloodstreaminfection
AT hsuehkevin riskfactorspredictingcandidaglabratabloodstreaminfection
AT powderlywilliam riskfactorspredictingcandidaglabratabloodstreaminfection
AT specandrej riskfactorspredictingcandidaglabratabloodstreaminfection