Cargando…

Impact of Insurance and Treatment Regimens on HCV Outcome: Long-term Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND: Directly acting agents (DAA) have revolutionized the treatment of Hepatitis C infection. However the access to appropriate drugs has been a barrier to therapy. Our objective of this study was to find the impact of insurance type and treatment regimen on outcome in patients with hepatitis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukka, Mallikarjuna, Akram, Sami, Koirala, Janak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632094/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.398
_version_ 1783269632340131840
author Mukka, Mallikarjuna
Akram, Sami
Koirala, Janak
author_facet Mukka, Mallikarjuna
Akram, Sami
Koirala, Janak
author_sort Mukka, Mallikarjuna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Directly acting agents (DAA) have revolutionized the treatment of Hepatitis C infection. However the access to appropriate drugs has been a barrier to therapy. Our objective of this study was to find the impact of insurance type and treatment regimen on outcome in patients with hepatitis C. METHODS: We have maintained a database of patients with HCV infection who were seen at our outpatient infectious disease clinic. We conducted a retrospective review of 160 patients who have been following since 2005–2006. In addition to baseline data, we also collected data on treatment status, regimens, outcome, insurance and reasons for no treatment. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for categorical variables and ANOVA for numerical variables. This study was approved by the institutional review board. RESULTS: Of the 160 charts reviewed, we had complete records of 40 patients who had a median follow-up period of 12 years. Among them 75% of the patients had HCV genotype 1 (1a or 1b). Liver biopsy was available only for 50% patients which showed 32.5% had early stage (0–2) and 27.5% had late stage (3–4) fibrosis. Most of the patients (17) were treated with older therapies (peg-interferon alpha with or without boceprevir or telaprevir) and 7 with newer DAA combinations, whereas 16 patients did not receive treatment. All patients with private insurance received treatment whereas a large proportion with public aid did not (100% vs. 57%, P = 0.002). Total 19 of 28 treated patients achieved a sustained viral response beyond 2 years. All 7 patients who received newer DAAs were cured. Among the 16 patients who did not receive antiviral treatment, 5 (30%) had a poor outcome including liver cirrhosis (1), hepatocellular carcinoma (2 HCC), and death (2) compared with only 2 patients (1 cirrhosis, 1 HCC) in treated group (P <0.001). None of the patients in treated group died. CONCLUSION: In this study, patients who did not have access to appropriate antiviral therapy had worse outcome. The main determinant for poor access to treatment was the type of insurance. It is important to improve access to treatment for all patients with HCV infection which can reduce the rate of progression to advanced liver disease and mortality. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56320942017-11-07 Impact of Insurance and Treatment Regimens on HCV Outcome: Long-term Follow-up Study Mukka, Mallikarjuna Akram, Sami Koirala, Janak Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Directly acting agents (DAA) have revolutionized the treatment of Hepatitis C infection. However the access to appropriate drugs has been a barrier to therapy. Our objective of this study was to find the impact of insurance type and treatment regimen on outcome in patients with hepatitis C. METHODS: We have maintained a database of patients with HCV infection who were seen at our outpatient infectious disease clinic. We conducted a retrospective review of 160 patients who have been following since 2005–2006. In addition to baseline data, we also collected data on treatment status, regimens, outcome, insurance and reasons for no treatment. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for categorical variables and ANOVA for numerical variables. This study was approved by the institutional review board. RESULTS: Of the 160 charts reviewed, we had complete records of 40 patients who had a median follow-up period of 12 years. Among them 75% of the patients had HCV genotype 1 (1a or 1b). Liver biopsy was available only for 50% patients which showed 32.5% had early stage (0–2) and 27.5% had late stage (3–4) fibrosis. Most of the patients (17) were treated with older therapies (peg-interferon alpha with or without boceprevir or telaprevir) and 7 with newer DAA combinations, whereas 16 patients did not receive treatment. All patients with private insurance received treatment whereas a large proportion with public aid did not (100% vs. 57%, P = 0.002). Total 19 of 28 treated patients achieved a sustained viral response beyond 2 years. All 7 patients who received newer DAAs were cured. Among the 16 patients who did not receive antiviral treatment, 5 (30%) had a poor outcome including liver cirrhosis (1), hepatocellular carcinoma (2 HCC), and death (2) compared with only 2 patients (1 cirrhosis, 1 HCC) in treated group (P <0.001). None of the patients in treated group died. CONCLUSION: In this study, patients who did not have access to appropriate antiviral therapy had worse outcome. The main determinant for poor access to treatment was the type of insurance. It is important to improve access to treatment for all patients with HCV infection which can reduce the rate of progression to advanced liver disease and mortality. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5632094/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.398 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Mukka, Mallikarjuna
Akram, Sami
Koirala, Janak
Impact of Insurance and Treatment Regimens on HCV Outcome: Long-term Follow-up Study
title Impact of Insurance and Treatment Regimens on HCV Outcome: Long-term Follow-up Study
title_full Impact of Insurance and Treatment Regimens on HCV Outcome: Long-term Follow-up Study
title_fullStr Impact of Insurance and Treatment Regimens on HCV Outcome: Long-term Follow-up Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Insurance and Treatment Regimens on HCV Outcome: Long-term Follow-up Study
title_short Impact of Insurance and Treatment Regimens on HCV Outcome: Long-term Follow-up Study
title_sort impact of insurance and treatment regimens on hcv outcome: long-term follow-up study
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632094/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.398
work_keys_str_mv AT mukkamallikarjuna impactofinsuranceandtreatmentregimensonhcvoutcomelongtermfollowupstudy
AT akramsami impactofinsuranceandtreatmentregimensonhcvoutcomelongtermfollowupstudy
AT koiralajanak impactofinsuranceandtreatmentregimensonhcvoutcomelongtermfollowupstudy