Cargando…

Impact of Infectious Diseases Consultation on Mortality in Patients with Candidemia

BACKGROUND: An infectious diseases (ID) consultation is often, but not always, obtained to help guide treatment of patients with candidemia. We examined if ID consultation affected patient outcome in patients with culture positive candidemia. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of 1,873 cas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mejia, Carlos, Kronen, Ryan, Lin, Charlotte, Hsueh, Kevin, Powderly, William, Spec, Andrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632193/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.123
_version_ 1783269650940821504
author Mejia, Carlos
Kronen, Ryan
Lin, Charlotte
Hsueh, Kevin
Powderly, William
Spec, Andrej
author_facet Mejia, Carlos
Kronen, Ryan
Lin, Charlotte
Hsueh, Kevin
Powderly, William
Spec, Andrej
author_sort Mejia, Carlos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An infectious diseases (ID) consultation is often, but not always, obtained to help guide treatment of patients with candidemia. We examined if ID consultation affected patient outcome in patients with culture positive candidemia. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of 1,873 cases of candidemia in patients hospitalized in our academic tertiary care hospital from 2002 to 2015. We collected data on comorbidities, predisposing factors; antifungal therapy, survival and ID consult. Patients who died within 24 hours of diagnosis were excluded, under the presumption that they did not have an opportunity to receive an ID consult. Survival analysis was performed via univariate and multivariate Cox Regression with censoring at 90 days, as subsequent mortality was less likely to be related to candidemia. RESULTS: 913 (49%) of the candidemic patients received an ID consult; 960 (51%) did not. Underlying comorbidities were evenly distributed between patients with and without an ID consult, except that patients with an ID consult more frequently had a central line (39% vs. 26%, p < 0.001), were on mechanical ventilation (4% vs. 2%, P = 0.003) or were receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (2.2% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.002). The ID consult group had lower 90-day mortality compared with patients without an ID consult (34% vs. 49%, P < 0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio of mortality for those patients receiving an ID consult of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.64, P < 0.001) (Fig 1). Patient management differed significantly: the ID consult group was more likely to receive an echinocandin (29% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) or amphotericin B (AmB) (3.4% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Candidemic patients who received an ID consult were significantly less likely to die, and were more likely to receive therapy with amphotericin or an echinocandin. These data suggest that an ID consult should be an integral part of clinical care of patients with candidemia. DISCLOSURES: W. Powderly, Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant; Gilead: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Astellas: Grant Investigator, Research grant; A. Spec, Astellas Pharma US, Inc.: Grant Investigator, Research grant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56321932017-10-12 Impact of Infectious Diseases Consultation on Mortality in Patients with Candidemia Mejia, Carlos Kronen, Ryan Lin, Charlotte Hsueh, Kevin Powderly, William Spec, Andrej Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: An infectious diseases (ID) consultation is often, but not always, obtained to help guide treatment of patients with candidemia. We examined if ID consultation affected patient outcome in patients with culture positive candidemia. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of 1,873 cases of candidemia in patients hospitalized in our academic tertiary care hospital from 2002 to 2015. We collected data on comorbidities, predisposing factors; antifungal therapy, survival and ID consult. Patients who died within 24 hours of diagnosis were excluded, under the presumption that they did not have an opportunity to receive an ID consult. Survival analysis was performed via univariate and multivariate Cox Regression with censoring at 90 days, as subsequent mortality was less likely to be related to candidemia. RESULTS: 913 (49%) of the candidemic patients received an ID consult; 960 (51%) did not. Underlying comorbidities were evenly distributed between patients with and without an ID consult, except that patients with an ID consult more frequently had a central line (39% vs. 26%, p < 0.001), were on mechanical ventilation (4% vs. 2%, P = 0.003) or were receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (2.2% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.002). The ID consult group had lower 90-day mortality compared with patients without an ID consult (34% vs. 49%, P < 0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio of mortality for those patients receiving an ID consult of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.64, P < 0.001) (Fig 1). Patient management differed significantly: the ID consult group was more likely to receive an echinocandin (29% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) or amphotericin B (AmB) (3.4% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Candidemic patients who received an ID consult were significantly less likely to die, and were more likely to receive therapy with amphotericin or an echinocandin. These data suggest that an ID consult should be an integral part of clinical care of patients with candidemia. DISCLOSURES: W. Powderly, Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant; Gilead: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Astellas: Grant Investigator, Research grant; A. Spec, Astellas Pharma US, Inc.: Grant Investigator, Research grant Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5632193/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.123 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Mejia, Carlos
Kronen, Ryan
Lin, Charlotte
Hsueh, Kevin
Powderly, William
Spec, Andrej
Impact of Infectious Diseases Consultation on Mortality in Patients with Candidemia
title Impact of Infectious Diseases Consultation on Mortality in Patients with Candidemia
title_full Impact of Infectious Diseases Consultation on Mortality in Patients with Candidemia
title_fullStr Impact of Infectious Diseases Consultation on Mortality in Patients with Candidemia
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Infectious Diseases Consultation on Mortality in Patients with Candidemia
title_short Impact of Infectious Diseases Consultation on Mortality in Patients with Candidemia
title_sort impact of infectious diseases consultation on mortality in patients with candidemia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632193/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx162.123
work_keys_str_mv AT mejiacarlos impactofinfectiousdiseasesconsultationonmortalityinpatientswithcandidemia
AT kronenryan impactofinfectiousdiseasesconsultationonmortalityinpatientswithcandidemia
AT lincharlotte impactofinfectiousdiseasesconsultationonmortalityinpatientswithcandidemia
AT hsuehkevin impactofinfectiousdiseasesconsultationonmortalityinpatientswithcandidemia
AT powderlywilliam impactofinfectiousdiseasesconsultationonmortalityinpatientswithcandidemia
AT specandrej impactofinfectiousdiseasesconsultationonmortalityinpatientswithcandidemia