Cargando…
Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Post-acute Care Facilities
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use data in adult nursing homes have been used to direct antimicrobial stewardship (AS) efforts for this healthcare setting. However, little is known about antimicrobial use in pediatric post-acute care facilities (pPACFs). The purpose of this study was to describe antimicr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632215/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.532 |
_version_ | 1783269655929946112 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Candace Neu, Natalie Saiman, Lisa |
author_facet | Johnson, Candace Neu, Natalie Saiman, Lisa |
author_sort | Johnson, Candace |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use data in adult nursing homes have been used to direct antimicrobial stewardship (AS) efforts for this healthcare setting. However, little is known about antimicrobial use in pediatric post-acute care facilities (pPACFs). The purpose of this study was to describe antimicrobial use in pPACFs. METHODS: We performed a point prevalence study of antimicrobial use in six geographically diverse pPACFs on two study dates: January 20 and July 20, 2016. Eligible facilities cared for residents 21 years old. Collected data were extracted from residentsÕ medical records and included antimicrobial agents given on the 2 study days; the indication for use, categorized as treatment of an infection, non-infectious use, e.g., dysmotility, or prophylaxis; and route of administration. Chi-squared tests were performed as applicable; P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: On January 20, 10% (67/666) of residents received 82 antimicrobial agents of which 45% were given to treat an infection (Figure 1). On July 20, 7% (49/677) of residents received 58 antimicrobial agents of which 51% were given to treat an infection. Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) were the most common infectious indication, accounting for 24% and 27% of residents given an antimicrobial for infection in January and July, respectively (Figure 2). Respiratory tract infections (RTI) accounted for 3% of residents given an antimicrobial for infection in January compared with 16% in July (P < 0.01). For treatment of infections, there was no significant difference between the use of systemic (oral and intravenous) agents in January (63%) compared with July (48%, P = 0.2, Figure 3); cephalosporins (32%) were the most common agents used. In July, topical antimicrobials were more common (52%) of which mupirocin and clindamycin were most common. CONCLUSION: In pPACFs, antimicrobial agents were less commonly given for infections than for non-infectious indications and prophylaxis. SSTIs were the most common infection and topical agents were more commonly used to treat infections in July. Surprisingly, treatment of RTIs was more common in July. This study suggests that care guidelines could be useful in promoting AS efforts for pPACFs. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5632215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56322152017-10-12 Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Post-acute Care Facilities Johnson, Candace Neu, Natalie Saiman, Lisa Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use data in adult nursing homes have been used to direct antimicrobial stewardship (AS) efforts for this healthcare setting. However, little is known about antimicrobial use in pediatric post-acute care facilities (pPACFs). The purpose of this study was to describe antimicrobial use in pPACFs. METHODS: We performed a point prevalence study of antimicrobial use in six geographically diverse pPACFs on two study dates: January 20 and July 20, 2016. Eligible facilities cared for residents 21 years old. Collected data were extracted from residentsÕ medical records and included antimicrobial agents given on the 2 study days; the indication for use, categorized as treatment of an infection, non-infectious use, e.g., dysmotility, or prophylaxis; and route of administration. Chi-squared tests were performed as applicable; P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: On January 20, 10% (67/666) of residents received 82 antimicrobial agents of which 45% were given to treat an infection (Figure 1). On July 20, 7% (49/677) of residents received 58 antimicrobial agents of which 51% were given to treat an infection. Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) were the most common infectious indication, accounting for 24% and 27% of residents given an antimicrobial for infection in January and July, respectively (Figure 2). Respiratory tract infections (RTI) accounted for 3% of residents given an antimicrobial for infection in January compared with 16% in July (P < 0.01). For treatment of infections, there was no significant difference between the use of systemic (oral and intravenous) agents in January (63%) compared with July (48%, P = 0.2, Figure 3); cephalosporins (32%) were the most common agents used. In July, topical antimicrobials were more common (52%) of which mupirocin and clindamycin were most common. CONCLUSION: In pPACFs, antimicrobial agents were less commonly given for infections than for non-infectious indications and prophylaxis. SSTIs were the most common infection and topical agents were more commonly used to treat infections in July. Surprisingly, treatment of RTIs was more common in July. This study suggests that care guidelines could be useful in promoting AS efforts for pPACFs. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5632215/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.532 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Johnson, Candace Neu, Natalie Saiman, Lisa Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Post-acute Care Facilities |
title | Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Post-acute Care Facilities |
title_full | Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Post-acute Care Facilities |
title_fullStr | Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Post-acute Care Facilities |
title_full_unstemmed | Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Post-acute Care Facilities |
title_short | Point Prevalence Survey on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Post-acute Care Facilities |
title_sort | point prevalence survey on antimicrobial use in pediatric post-acute care facilities |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632215/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.532 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsoncandace pointprevalencesurveyonantimicrobialuseinpediatricpostacutecarefacilities AT neunatalie pointprevalencesurveyonantimicrobialuseinpediatricpostacutecarefacilities AT saimanlisa pointprevalencesurveyonantimicrobialuseinpediatricpostacutecarefacilities |