Cargando…

Agar Gradient Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Reliable Alternative to Agar Dilution?

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by agar dilution, the gold-standard for determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for N. gonorrhoeae, is a labor intensive technique usually performed in reference laboratories. Agar gradient diffusion is a simpler alternative to obtain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desjardins, Michaël, Lefebvre, Brigitte, Labbé, Annie-Claude, Martin, Irene, Mauffrey, Florian, Longtin, Jean, Fortin, Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632223/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.105
_version_ 1783269657000542208
author Desjardins, Michaël
Lefebvre, Brigitte
Labbé, Annie-Claude
Martin, Irene
Mauffrey, Florian
Longtin, Jean
Fortin, Claude
author_facet Desjardins, Michaël
Lefebvre, Brigitte
Labbé, Annie-Claude
Martin, Irene
Mauffrey, Florian
Longtin, Jean
Fortin, Claude
author_sort Desjardins, Michaël
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by agar dilution, the gold-standard for determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for N. gonorrhoeae, is a labor intensive technique usually performed in reference laboratories. Agar gradient diffusion is a simpler alternative to obtain MICs. However, correlation of N. gonorrhoeae MIC values obtained by the two methods is not well established. The objective of this study is to evaluate performance of agar gradient diffusion compared with agar dilution for N. gonorrhoeae. METHODS: Fifty strains of N. gonorrhoeae (34 isolates from clinical specimens; 14 WHO reference and two ATCC strains), all confirmed to be genetically distinct using molecular typing (NG-MAST), were selected. Isolates with known high MICs were targeted. Agar gradient diffusion MIC testing was done in a clinical laboratory on all strains for ceftriaxone, cefixime, and azithromycin while comparing two different commercial antimicrobial strips (bioMérieux, Alere) on three different culture media (BD, Oxoid, CLSI’s recommended medium). Agar dilution MIC testing according to CLSI was done at the Québec provincial reference laboratory on all strains. Performance of agar gradient diffusion was assessed by accuracy, using essential and categorical agreements, and by precision (reproducibility). RESULTS: When comparing agar dilution and agar gradient diffusion using bioMérieux strips on CLSI testing medium, essential agreements (within 1-log2 dilution) were 94, 88, and 82% for ceftriaxone, cefixime, and azithromycin, respectively. Categorical agreements were 100, 94, and 94%. Agar gradient diffusion, compared with agar dilution, had a tendency to under-estimate MIC for third-generation cephalosporins, not classifying 86% of isolates with decreased susceptibility (MIC 0.12–0.25 mg/l for ceftriaxone, 0.25 mg/l for cefixime) as such. Overall precision of agar gradient diffusion was 96%. CONCLUSION: Agar gradient diffusion using bioMérieux strips on CLSI testing medium shows satisfactory accuracy compared with agar dilution for N. gonorrhoeae MIC testing of third-generation cephalosporins and azithromycin even in a carefully selected panel of strains. DISCLOSURES: M. Desjardins, bioMerieux: Research Contractor, Research support. BD: Research Contractor, Research support. Alere: Research Contractor, Research support. Oxoid: Research Contractor, Research support. C. Fortin, Alere: Research Contractor, Research support. bioMerieux: Research Contractor, Research support. BD: Research Contractor, Research support Oxoid: Research Contractor, Research support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56322232017-10-12 Agar Gradient Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Reliable Alternative to Agar Dilution? Desjardins, Michaël Lefebvre, Brigitte Labbé, Annie-Claude Martin, Irene Mauffrey, Florian Longtin, Jean Fortin, Claude Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by agar dilution, the gold-standard for determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for N. gonorrhoeae, is a labor intensive technique usually performed in reference laboratories. Agar gradient diffusion is a simpler alternative to obtain MICs. However, correlation of N. gonorrhoeae MIC values obtained by the two methods is not well established. The objective of this study is to evaluate performance of agar gradient diffusion compared with agar dilution for N. gonorrhoeae. METHODS: Fifty strains of N. gonorrhoeae (34 isolates from clinical specimens; 14 WHO reference and two ATCC strains), all confirmed to be genetically distinct using molecular typing (NG-MAST), were selected. Isolates with known high MICs were targeted. Agar gradient diffusion MIC testing was done in a clinical laboratory on all strains for ceftriaxone, cefixime, and azithromycin while comparing two different commercial antimicrobial strips (bioMérieux, Alere) on three different culture media (BD, Oxoid, CLSI’s recommended medium). Agar dilution MIC testing according to CLSI was done at the Québec provincial reference laboratory on all strains. Performance of agar gradient diffusion was assessed by accuracy, using essential and categorical agreements, and by precision (reproducibility). RESULTS: When comparing agar dilution and agar gradient diffusion using bioMérieux strips on CLSI testing medium, essential agreements (within 1-log2 dilution) were 94, 88, and 82% for ceftriaxone, cefixime, and azithromycin, respectively. Categorical agreements were 100, 94, and 94%. Agar gradient diffusion, compared with agar dilution, had a tendency to under-estimate MIC for third-generation cephalosporins, not classifying 86% of isolates with decreased susceptibility (MIC 0.12–0.25 mg/l for ceftriaxone, 0.25 mg/l for cefixime) as such. Overall precision of agar gradient diffusion was 96%. CONCLUSION: Agar gradient diffusion using bioMérieux strips on CLSI testing medium shows satisfactory accuracy compared with agar dilution for N. gonorrhoeae MIC testing of third-generation cephalosporins and azithromycin even in a carefully selected panel of strains. DISCLOSURES: M. Desjardins, bioMerieux: Research Contractor, Research support. BD: Research Contractor, Research support. Alere: Research Contractor, Research support. Oxoid: Research Contractor, Research support. C. Fortin, Alere: Research Contractor, Research support. bioMerieux: Research Contractor, Research support. BD: Research Contractor, Research support Oxoid: Research Contractor, Research support Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5632223/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.105 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Desjardins, Michaël
Lefebvre, Brigitte
Labbé, Annie-Claude
Martin, Irene
Mauffrey, Florian
Longtin, Jean
Fortin, Claude
Agar Gradient Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Reliable Alternative to Agar Dilution?
title Agar Gradient Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Reliable Alternative to Agar Dilution?
title_full Agar Gradient Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Reliable Alternative to Agar Dilution?
title_fullStr Agar Gradient Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Reliable Alternative to Agar Dilution?
title_full_unstemmed Agar Gradient Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Reliable Alternative to Agar Dilution?
title_short Agar Gradient Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Reliable Alternative to Agar Dilution?
title_sort agar gradient diffusion susceptibility testing for neisseria gonorrhoeae: a reliable alternative to agar dilution?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632223/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.105
work_keys_str_mv AT desjardinsmichael agargradientdiffusionsusceptibilitytestingforneisseriagonorrhoeaeareliablealternativetoagardilution
AT lefebvrebrigitte agargradientdiffusionsusceptibilitytestingforneisseriagonorrhoeaeareliablealternativetoagardilution
AT labbeannieclaude agargradientdiffusionsusceptibilitytestingforneisseriagonorrhoeaeareliablealternativetoagardilution
AT martinirene agargradientdiffusionsusceptibilitytestingforneisseriagonorrhoeaeareliablealternativetoagardilution
AT mauffreyflorian agargradientdiffusionsusceptibilitytestingforneisseriagonorrhoeaeareliablealternativetoagardilution
AT longtinjean agargradientdiffusionsusceptibilitytestingforneisseriagonorrhoeaeareliablealternativetoagardilution
AT fortinclaude agargradientdiffusionsusceptibilitytestingforneisseriagonorrhoeaeareliablealternativetoagardilution