Cargando…

Impact of An Electronic “Antibiotic Time Out” on Provider Prescribing Patterns

BACKGROUND: Current antibiotic stewardship guidelines suggest the use of an antibiotic time-out (ATO) 48–72 hours after antibiotic initiation to encourage review of empiric regimens once additional diagnostic information is available; however, the recommendation is based on low-quality evidence. Our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwong Li, Sui, Lewis, James S, Forrest, Graeme N, Elman, Miriam R, McGregor, Jessina C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632235/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.583
_version_ 1783269658747469824
author Kwong Li, Sui
Lewis, James S
Forrest, Graeme N
Elman, Miriam R
McGregor, Jessina C
author_facet Kwong Li, Sui
Lewis, James S
Forrest, Graeme N
Elman, Miriam R
McGregor, Jessina C
author_sort Kwong Li, Sui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current antibiotic stewardship guidelines suggest the use of an antibiotic time-out (ATO) 48–72 hours after antibiotic initiation to encourage review of empiric regimens once additional diagnostic information is available; however, the recommendation is based on low-quality evidence. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of an electronic ATO alert within the EPIC™ electronic health record on provider prescribing patterns after implementation. METHODS: The ATO alerts were instituted in January 2017 and were triggered when an inpatient received Vancomycin (VAN), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (PT), Ceftriaxone (CEF), or a combination of them for >72 hours. We used an EPIC™ benchside report to identify ATO alerts between January and April 2017 and systematically reviewed charts from the last week of each month to identify de-escalation opportunities (DEO). Pediatric, bone marrow transplant, orthopedic, and cystic fibrosis patients were excluded. The primary outcome was de-escalation within 12 hours of the alert, defined as narrowing of spectrum or discontinuation of antibiotics. RESULTS: We identified 805 alerts among 209 patients; 87 patients were excluded from analysis. Among 122 included patients, a median of 3 alerts were triggered per patient (470 in total). DEO was identified in 34.7% of alerts; de-escalation events (DEE) occurred in 34.3% of DEO. Table 1 lists alerts, DEO, and DEE by antibiotic. PT was the most frequently de-escalated antibiotic (46.4% [26/56] of DEE). De-escalation occurred more frequently among patients either actively followed (P < 0.01) or receiving new consultations by Infectious Disease (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: An electronic ATO alert triggered only on the basis of drug and duration lacked specificity in identifying opportunities for antibiotic de-escalation. De-escalation occurred significantly more frequently with Infectious Disease team involvement. Additional study is required to identify how to best support de-escalation efforts. DISCLOSURES: J. S. Lewis II, Merck & Co.: Consultant, Consulting fee. J. C. McGregor, Merck & Co.: Grant Investigator, Research grant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56322352017-10-12 Impact of An Electronic “Antibiotic Time Out” on Provider Prescribing Patterns Kwong Li, Sui Lewis, James S Forrest, Graeme N Elman, Miriam R McGregor, Jessina C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Current antibiotic stewardship guidelines suggest the use of an antibiotic time-out (ATO) 48–72 hours after antibiotic initiation to encourage review of empiric regimens once additional diagnostic information is available; however, the recommendation is based on low-quality evidence. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of an electronic ATO alert within the EPIC™ electronic health record on provider prescribing patterns after implementation. METHODS: The ATO alerts were instituted in January 2017 and were triggered when an inpatient received Vancomycin (VAN), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (PT), Ceftriaxone (CEF), or a combination of them for >72 hours. We used an EPIC™ benchside report to identify ATO alerts between January and April 2017 and systematically reviewed charts from the last week of each month to identify de-escalation opportunities (DEO). Pediatric, bone marrow transplant, orthopedic, and cystic fibrosis patients were excluded. The primary outcome was de-escalation within 12 hours of the alert, defined as narrowing of spectrum or discontinuation of antibiotics. RESULTS: We identified 805 alerts among 209 patients; 87 patients were excluded from analysis. Among 122 included patients, a median of 3 alerts were triggered per patient (470 in total). DEO was identified in 34.7% of alerts; de-escalation events (DEE) occurred in 34.3% of DEO. Table 1 lists alerts, DEO, and DEE by antibiotic. PT was the most frequently de-escalated antibiotic (46.4% [26/56] of DEE). De-escalation occurred more frequently among patients either actively followed (P < 0.01) or receiving new consultations by Infectious Disease (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: An electronic ATO alert triggered only on the basis of drug and duration lacked specificity in identifying opportunities for antibiotic de-escalation. De-escalation occurred significantly more frequently with Infectious Disease team involvement. Additional study is required to identify how to best support de-escalation efforts. DISCLOSURES: J. S. Lewis II, Merck & Co.: Consultant, Consulting fee. J. C. McGregor, Merck & Co.: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5632235/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.583 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kwong Li, Sui
Lewis, James S
Forrest, Graeme N
Elman, Miriam R
McGregor, Jessina C
Impact of An Electronic “Antibiotic Time Out” on Provider Prescribing Patterns
title Impact of An Electronic “Antibiotic Time Out” on Provider Prescribing Patterns
title_full Impact of An Electronic “Antibiotic Time Out” on Provider Prescribing Patterns
title_fullStr Impact of An Electronic “Antibiotic Time Out” on Provider Prescribing Patterns
title_full_unstemmed Impact of An Electronic “Antibiotic Time Out” on Provider Prescribing Patterns
title_short Impact of An Electronic “Antibiotic Time Out” on Provider Prescribing Patterns
title_sort impact of an electronic “antibiotic time out” on provider prescribing patterns
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632235/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.583
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonglisui impactofanelectronicantibiotictimeoutonproviderprescribingpatterns
AT lewisjamess impactofanelectronicantibiotictimeoutonproviderprescribingpatterns
AT forrestgraemen impactofanelectronicantibiotictimeoutonproviderprescribingpatterns
AT elmanmiriamr impactofanelectronicantibiotictimeoutonproviderprescribingpatterns
AT mcgregorjessinac impactofanelectronicantibiotictimeoutonproviderprescribingpatterns