Cargando…

Diabetic Foot Wounds: Which Patients are More Prone to Tetanus?

BACKGROUND: Patients who have diabetes and chronic wounds are more prone to tetanus than the other populations. The prevalence of diabetes among patients diagnosed with tetanus was 15%, nearly three times the average expected prevalence of diabetes in the United States. In this study, we aimed to ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuscu, Ferit, Kurtaran, Behice, Ulu, Aslihan, Evran, Mehtap, Inal, Seza, Komur, Suheyla, Cetiner, Salih, Tasova, Yesim, Zeki Aksu, Hasan Salih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632236/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.127
_version_ 1783269658982350848
author Kuscu, Ferit
Kurtaran, Behice
Ulu, Aslihan
Evran, Mehtap
Inal, Seza
Komur, Suheyla
Cetiner, Salih
Tasova, Yesim
Zeki Aksu, Hasan Salih
author_facet Kuscu, Ferit
Kurtaran, Behice
Ulu, Aslihan
Evran, Mehtap
Inal, Seza
Komur, Suheyla
Cetiner, Salih
Tasova, Yesim
Zeki Aksu, Hasan Salih
author_sort Kuscu, Ferit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients who have diabetes and chronic wounds are more prone to tetanus than the other populations. The prevalence of diabetes among patients diagnosed with tetanus was 15%, nearly three times the average expected prevalence of diabetes in the United States. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the tetanus immunization status of the patients with diabetic foot wounds (DFW) and to determine the factors, which may predict to immunity against tetanus. METHODS: Patients who admitted to outpatient clinics with DFW were included between 1 January and 31 December 2016. Tetanus antibody levels were measured by a commercial Clostridium tetani 5S IgG ELISA kit. Antibody levels below 0.1 IU/ml were defined as “No reliable protection” and levels above 0.1 IU/ml were defined as “Reliable protection”. A questionnaire applied to all patients for detailed diabetes and vaccinating history about tetanus. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were enrolled to the study, 66 (72.5%) of them were male and 25 (%27.5) of them were female. Mean age was 62 ± 11 years. Sixty-five (71.4%) of the patients had no reliable protection while 26 (28.6%) of them had reliable protection. Tetanus IgG titers were decreasing by the age (Figure). Univariate analysis results between the immune and non-immune groups were demonstrated in Table: In the logistic regression analysis, only patients’ age was found statistically significant predictive factor for immunity against tetanus (OR: 1,114 95% CI: 1,047–1,185). CONCLUSION: We found that elderly patients with DFW have very low rate of immunization against tetanus. Therefore, tetanus vaccination should be given particularly to the elderly patients with DFW without any serological control. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56322362017-10-12 Diabetic Foot Wounds: Which Patients are More Prone to Tetanus? Kuscu, Ferit Kurtaran, Behice Ulu, Aslihan Evran, Mehtap Inal, Seza Komur, Suheyla Cetiner, Salih Tasova, Yesim Zeki Aksu, Hasan Salih Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Patients who have diabetes and chronic wounds are more prone to tetanus than the other populations. The prevalence of diabetes among patients diagnosed with tetanus was 15%, nearly three times the average expected prevalence of diabetes in the United States. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the tetanus immunization status of the patients with diabetic foot wounds (DFW) and to determine the factors, which may predict to immunity against tetanus. METHODS: Patients who admitted to outpatient clinics with DFW were included between 1 January and 31 December 2016. Tetanus antibody levels were measured by a commercial Clostridium tetani 5S IgG ELISA kit. Antibody levels below 0.1 IU/ml were defined as “No reliable protection” and levels above 0.1 IU/ml were defined as “Reliable protection”. A questionnaire applied to all patients for detailed diabetes and vaccinating history about tetanus. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were enrolled to the study, 66 (72.5%) of them were male and 25 (%27.5) of them were female. Mean age was 62 ± 11 years. Sixty-five (71.4%) of the patients had no reliable protection while 26 (28.6%) of them had reliable protection. Tetanus IgG titers were decreasing by the age (Figure). Univariate analysis results between the immune and non-immune groups were demonstrated in Table: In the logistic regression analysis, only patients’ age was found statistically significant predictive factor for immunity against tetanus (OR: 1,114 95% CI: 1,047–1,185). CONCLUSION: We found that elderly patients with DFW have very low rate of immunization against tetanus. Therefore, tetanus vaccination should be given particularly to the elderly patients with DFW without any serological control. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5632236/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.127 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kuscu, Ferit
Kurtaran, Behice
Ulu, Aslihan
Evran, Mehtap
Inal, Seza
Komur, Suheyla
Cetiner, Salih
Tasova, Yesim
Zeki Aksu, Hasan Salih
Diabetic Foot Wounds: Which Patients are More Prone to Tetanus?
title Diabetic Foot Wounds: Which Patients are More Prone to Tetanus?
title_full Diabetic Foot Wounds: Which Patients are More Prone to Tetanus?
title_fullStr Diabetic Foot Wounds: Which Patients are More Prone to Tetanus?
title_full_unstemmed Diabetic Foot Wounds: Which Patients are More Prone to Tetanus?
title_short Diabetic Foot Wounds: Which Patients are More Prone to Tetanus?
title_sort diabetic foot wounds: which patients are more prone to tetanus?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632236/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofx163.127
work_keys_str_mv AT kuscuferit diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus
AT kurtaranbehice diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus
AT uluaslihan diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus
AT evranmehtap diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus
AT inalseza diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus
AT komursuheyla diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus
AT cetinersalih diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus
AT tasovayesim diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus
AT zekiaksuhasansalih diabeticfootwoundswhichpatientsaremorepronetotetanus