Cargando…
The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research
INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) does not cure HIV infection due to the persistence of HIV reservoirs in long-lived memory CD4 T cells present in the blood, lymph nodes, intestinal tract, and other tissues. Interest grows in obtaining gut-tissue samples for HIV persistence studies, which p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mediscript Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057085 |
_version_ | 1783269724525690880 |
---|---|
author | Mehraj, Vikram Ghali, Peter Ramendra, Rayoun Costiniuk, Cecilia Lebouché, Bertrand Ponte, Rosalie Reinhard, Robert Sousa, Jose Chomont, Nicolas Cohen, Eric A Ancuta, Petronela Routy, Jean-Pierre |
author_facet | Mehraj, Vikram Ghali, Peter Ramendra, Rayoun Costiniuk, Cecilia Lebouché, Bertrand Ponte, Rosalie Reinhard, Robert Sousa, Jose Chomont, Nicolas Cohen, Eric A Ancuta, Petronela Routy, Jean-Pierre |
author_sort | Mehraj, Vikram |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) does not cure HIV infection due to the persistence of HIV reservoirs in long-lived memory CD4 T cells present in the blood, lymph nodes, intestinal tract, and other tissues. Interest grows in obtaining gut-tissue samples for HIV persistence studies, which poses an ethical challenge to provide study volunteers with adequate information on risks and benefits. Herein we assess the risks and benefits of undergoing gut biopsy procedures for HIV pathogenesis and reservoir studies. METHODS: A group discussion was organised with physicians and community representatives on performing either a flexible sigmoidoscopy or a colonoscopy. Consensus was reached on conducting colonoscopy in persons ≥50 years. Thirty HIV-infected, ART-treated and nine uninfected participants were recruited. Colonoscopy was performed to collect 30 gut mucosal biopsies. When present, polyps were removed and abnormal mucosal findings were biopsied for pathological analysis. Participants were interviewed on potential discomfort following colonoscopic examination. RESULTS: The HIV-infected and uninfected groups were comparable in terms of age and gender with more men who have sex with men (MSM) in the former group. Abnormal colonoscopic findings were observed in 43.6% of all the participants and did not differ by HIV status. In total, 24 polyps were removed with a higher mean number of polyps removed in HIV-infected versus uninfected participants (1.7 vs 1.0, P=0.013). The number of polyps marginally correlated with inverted CD4:CD8 ratio. Based on our findings, colonoscopic examination was safe to use for gut biopsy procedures where almost half of the participants had polyps removed. CONCLUSION: Participation in the study provided colon cancer screening as an ancillary benefit that participants could have received in standard medical care, thus mitigating burdens of invasive procedures. Dialogue between community representatives and clinical researchers can increase participation and advance HIV cure research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5632548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Mediscript Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56325482017-10-20 The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research Mehraj, Vikram Ghali, Peter Ramendra, Rayoun Costiniuk, Cecilia Lebouché, Bertrand Ponte, Rosalie Reinhard, Robert Sousa, Jose Chomont, Nicolas Cohen, Eric A Ancuta, Petronela Routy, Jean-Pierre J Virus Erad Original Research INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) does not cure HIV infection due to the persistence of HIV reservoirs in long-lived memory CD4 T cells present in the blood, lymph nodes, intestinal tract, and other tissues. Interest grows in obtaining gut-tissue samples for HIV persistence studies, which poses an ethical challenge to provide study volunteers with adequate information on risks and benefits. Herein we assess the risks and benefits of undergoing gut biopsy procedures for HIV pathogenesis and reservoir studies. METHODS: A group discussion was organised with physicians and community representatives on performing either a flexible sigmoidoscopy or a colonoscopy. Consensus was reached on conducting colonoscopy in persons ≥50 years. Thirty HIV-infected, ART-treated and nine uninfected participants were recruited. Colonoscopy was performed to collect 30 gut mucosal biopsies. When present, polyps were removed and abnormal mucosal findings were biopsied for pathological analysis. Participants were interviewed on potential discomfort following colonoscopic examination. RESULTS: The HIV-infected and uninfected groups were comparable in terms of age and gender with more men who have sex with men (MSM) in the former group. Abnormal colonoscopic findings were observed in 43.6% of all the participants and did not differ by HIV status. In total, 24 polyps were removed with a higher mean number of polyps removed in HIV-infected versus uninfected participants (1.7 vs 1.0, P=0.013). The number of polyps marginally correlated with inverted CD4:CD8 ratio. Based on our findings, colonoscopic examination was safe to use for gut biopsy procedures where almost half of the participants had polyps removed. CONCLUSION: Participation in the study provided colon cancer screening as an ancillary benefit that participants could have received in standard medical care, thus mitigating burdens of invasive procedures. Dialogue between community representatives and clinical researchers can increase participation and advance HIV cure research. Mediscript Ltd 2017-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5632548/ /pubmed/29057085 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Virus Eradication published by Mediscript Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article published under the terms of a Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mehraj, Vikram Ghali, Peter Ramendra, Rayoun Costiniuk, Cecilia Lebouché, Bertrand Ponte, Rosalie Reinhard, Robert Sousa, Jose Chomont, Nicolas Cohen, Eric A Ancuta, Petronela Routy, Jean-Pierre The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research |
title | The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research |
title_full | The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research |
title_short | The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research |
title_sort | evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in hiv cure research |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehrajvikram theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT ghalipeter theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT ramendrarayoun theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT costiniukcecilia theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT lebouchebertrand theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT ponterosalie theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT reinhardrobert theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT sousajose theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT chomontnicolas theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT cohenerica theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT ancutapetronela theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT routyjeanpierre theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT mehrajvikram evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT ghalipeter evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT ramendrarayoun evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT costiniukcecilia evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT lebouchebertrand evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT ponterosalie evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT reinhardrobert evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT sousajose evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT chomontnicolas evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT cohenerica evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT ancutapetronela evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch AT routyjeanpierre evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch |