Cargando…

The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research

INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) does not cure HIV infection due to the persistence of HIV reservoirs in long-lived memory CD4 T cells present in the blood, lymph nodes, intestinal tract, and other tissues. Interest grows in obtaining gut-tissue samples for HIV persistence studies, which p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehraj, Vikram, Ghali, Peter, Ramendra, Rayoun, Costiniuk, Cecilia, Lebouché, Bertrand, Ponte, Rosalie, Reinhard, Robert, Sousa, Jose, Chomont, Nicolas, Cohen, Eric A, Ancuta, Petronela, Routy, Jean-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mediscript Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057085
_version_ 1783269724525690880
author Mehraj, Vikram
Ghali, Peter
Ramendra, Rayoun
Costiniuk, Cecilia
Lebouché, Bertrand
Ponte, Rosalie
Reinhard, Robert
Sousa, Jose
Chomont, Nicolas
Cohen, Eric A
Ancuta, Petronela
Routy, Jean-Pierre
author_facet Mehraj, Vikram
Ghali, Peter
Ramendra, Rayoun
Costiniuk, Cecilia
Lebouché, Bertrand
Ponte, Rosalie
Reinhard, Robert
Sousa, Jose
Chomont, Nicolas
Cohen, Eric A
Ancuta, Petronela
Routy, Jean-Pierre
author_sort Mehraj, Vikram
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) does not cure HIV infection due to the persistence of HIV reservoirs in long-lived memory CD4 T cells present in the blood, lymph nodes, intestinal tract, and other tissues. Interest grows in obtaining gut-tissue samples for HIV persistence studies, which poses an ethical challenge to provide study volunteers with adequate information on risks and benefits. Herein we assess the risks and benefits of undergoing gut biopsy procedures for HIV pathogenesis and reservoir studies. METHODS: A group discussion was organised with physicians and community representatives on performing either a flexible sigmoidoscopy or a colonoscopy. Consensus was reached on conducting colonoscopy in persons ≥50 years. Thirty HIV-infected, ART-treated and nine uninfected participants were recruited. Colonoscopy was performed to collect 30 gut mucosal biopsies. When present, polyps were removed and abnormal mucosal findings were biopsied for pathological analysis. Participants were interviewed on potential discomfort following colonoscopic examination. RESULTS: The HIV-infected and uninfected groups were comparable in terms of age and gender with more men who have sex with men (MSM) in the former group. Abnormal colonoscopic findings were observed in 43.6% of all the participants and did not differ by HIV status. In total, 24 polyps were removed with a higher mean number of polyps removed in HIV-infected versus uninfected participants (1.7 vs 1.0, P=0.013). The number of polyps marginally correlated with inverted CD4:CD8 ratio. Based on our findings, colonoscopic examination was safe to use for gut biopsy procedures where almost half of the participants had polyps removed. CONCLUSION: Participation in the study provided colon cancer screening as an ancillary benefit that participants could have received in standard medical care, thus mitigating burdens of invasive procedures. Dialogue between community representatives and clinical researchers can increase participation and advance HIV cure research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mediscript Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56325482017-10-20 The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research Mehraj, Vikram Ghali, Peter Ramendra, Rayoun Costiniuk, Cecilia Lebouché, Bertrand Ponte, Rosalie Reinhard, Robert Sousa, Jose Chomont, Nicolas Cohen, Eric A Ancuta, Petronela Routy, Jean-Pierre J Virus Erad Original Research INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) does not cure HIV infection due to the persistence of HIV reservoirs in long-lived memory CD4 T cells present in the blood, lymph nodes, intestinal tract, and other tissues. Interest grows in obtaining gut-tissue samples for HIV persistence studies, which poses an ethical challenge to provide study volunteers with adequate information on risks and benefits. Herein we assess the risks and benefits of undergoing gut biopsy procedures for HIV pathogenesis and reservoir studies. METHODS: A group discussion was organised with physicians and community representatives on performing either a flexible sigmoidoscopy or a colonoscopy. Consensus was reached on conducting colonoscopy in persons ≥50 years. Thirty HIV-infected, ART-treated and nine uninfected participants were recruited. Colonoscopy was performed to collect 30 gut mucosal biopsies. When present, polyps were removed and abnormal mucosal findings were biopsied for pathological analysis. Participants were interviewed on potential discomfort following colonoscopic examination. RESULTS: The HIV-infected and uninfected groups were comparable in terms of age and gender with more men who have sex with men (MSM) in the former group. Abnormal colonoscopic findings were observed in 43.6% of all the participants and did not differ by HIV status. In total, 24 polyps were removed with a higher mean number of polyps removed in HIV-infected versus uninfected participants (1.7 vs 1.0, P=0.013). The number of polyps marginally correlated with inverted CD4:CD8 ratio. Based on our findings, colonoscopic examination was safe to use for gut biopsy procedures where almost half of the participants had polyps removed. CONCLUSION: Participation in the study provided colon cancer screening as an ancillary benefit that participants could have received in standard medical care, thus mitigating burdens of invasive procedures. Dialogue between community representatives and clinical researchers can increase participation and advance HIV cure research. Mediscript Ltd 2017-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5632548/ /pubmed/29057085 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Virus Eradication published by Mediscript Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article published under the terms of a Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mehraj, Vikram
Ghali, Peter
Ramendra, Rayoun
Costiniuk, Cecilia
Lebouché, Bertrand
Ponte, Rosalie
Reinhard, Robert
Sousa, Jose
Chomont, Nicolas
Cohen, Eric A
Ancuta, Petronela
Routy, Jean-Pierre
The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research
title The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research
title_full The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research
title_fullStr The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research
title_short The evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in HIV cure research
title_sort evaluation of risk-benefit ratio for gut tissue sampling in hiv cure research
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057085
work_keys_str_mv AT mehrajvikram theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT ghalipeter theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT ramendrarayoun theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT costiniukcecilia theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT lebouchebertrand theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT ponterosalie theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT reinhardrobert theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT sousajose theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT chomontnicolas theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT cohenerica theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT ancutapetronela theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT routyjeanpierre theevaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT mehrajvikram evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT ghalipeter evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT ramendrarayoun evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT costiniukcecilia evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT lebouchebertrand evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT ponterosalie evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT reinhardrobert evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT sousajose evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT chomontnicolas evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT cohenerica evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT ancutapetronela evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch
AT routyjeanpierre evaluationofriskbenefitratioforguttissuesamplinginhivcureresearch