Cargando…

Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial design has received substantial attention in recent years. Although various extensions to the original design have been proposed, no guidance is available on the design of stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with interim analyses. In an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grayling, Michael J, Wason, James MS, Mander, Adrian P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28653550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774517716937
_version_ 1783269727559221248
author Grayling, Michael J
Wason, James MS
Mander, Adrian P
author_facet Grayling, Michael J
Wason, James MS
Mander, Adrian P
author_sort Grayling, Michael J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial design has received substantial attention in recent years. Although various extensions to the original design have been proposed, no guidance is available on the design of stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with interim analyses. In an individually randomised trial setting, group sequential methods can provide notable efficiency gains and ethical benefits. We address this by discussing how established group sequential methodology can be adapted for stepped-wedge designs. METHODS: Utilising the error spending approach to group sequential trial design, we detail the assumptions required for the determination of stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with interim analyses. We consider early stopping for efficacy, futility, or efficacy and futility. We describe first how this can be done for any specified linear mixed model for data analysis. We then focus on one particular commonly utilised model and, using a recently completed stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial, compare the performance of several designs with interim analyses to the classical stepped-wedge design. Finally, the performance of a quantile substitution procedure for dealing with the case of unknown variance is explored. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the incorporation of early stopping in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial designs could reduce the expected sample size under the null and alternative hypotheses by up to 31% and 22%, respectively, with no cost to the trial’s type-I and type-II error rates. The use of restricted error maximum likelihood estimation was found to be more important than quantile substitution for controlling the type-I error rate. CONCLUSION: The addition of interim analyses into stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials could help guard against time-consuming trials conducted on poor performing treatments and also help expedite the implementation of efficacious treatments. In future, trialists should consider incorporating early stopping of some kind into stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials according to the needs of the particular trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56325632017-10-08 Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials Grayling, Michael J Wason, James MS Mander, Adrian P Clin Trials Articles BACKGROUND/AIMS: The stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial design has received substantial attention in recent years. Although various extensions to the original design have been proposed, no guidance is available on the design of stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with interim analyses. In an individually randomised trial setting, group sequential methods can provide notable efficiency gains and ethical benefits. We address this by discussing how established group sequential methodology can be adapted for stepped-wedge designs. METHODS: Utilising the error spending approach to group sequential trial design, we detail the assumptions required for the determination of stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with interim analyses. We consider early stopping for efficacy, futility, or efficacy and futility. We describe first how this can be done for any specified linear mixed model for data analysis. We then focus on one particular commonly utilised model and, using a recently completed stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial, compare the performance of several designs with interim analyses to the classical stepped-wedge design. Finally, the performance of a quantile substitution procedure for dealing with the case of unknown variance is explored. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the incorporation of early stopping in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial designs could reduce the expected sample size under the null and alternative hypotheses by up to 31% and 22%, respectively, with no cost to the trial’s type-I and type-II error rates. The use of restricted error maximum likelihood estimation was found to be more important than quantile substitution for controlling the type-I error rate. CONCLUSION: The addition of interim analyses into stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials could help guard against time-consuming trials conducted on poor performing treatments and also help expedite the implementation of efficacious treatments. In future, trialists should consider incorporating early stopping of some kind into stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials according to the needs of the particular trial. SAGE Publications 2017-06-27 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5632563/ /pubmed/28653550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774517716937 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Grayling, Michael J
Wason, James MS
Mander, Adrian P
Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
title Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
title_full Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
title_fullStr Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
title_full_unstemmed Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
title_short Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
title_sort group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28653550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774517716937
work_keys_str_mv AT graylingmichaelj groupsequentialdesignsforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrials
AT wasonjamesms groupsequentialdesignsforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrials
AT manderadrianp groupsequentialdesignsforsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedtrials