Cargando…

Susceptibility of In Vitro Melanoma Skin Cancer to Photoactivated Hypericin versus Aluminium(III) Phthalocyanine Chloride Tetrasulphonate

The sensitivity of human melanoma cells to photoactivated Hypericin (Hyp) compared to aluminium(III) phthalocyanine chloride tetrasulphonate (AlPcS(4)Cl) is reported in this study. Melanoma cells (A375 cell line) were treated with various concentrations of Hyp or AlPcS(4)Cl alone, for 1, 4, and 24 h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ndhundhuma, I. M., Abrahamse, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5407012
_version_ 1783269788330491904
author Ndhundhuma, I. M.
Abrahamse, H.
author_facet Ndhundhuma, I. M.
Abrahamse, H.
author_sort Ndhundhuma, I. M.
collection PubMed
description The sensitivity of human melanoma cells to photoactivated Hypericin (Hyp) compared to aluminium(III) phthalocyanine chloride tetrasulphonate (AlPcS(4)Cl) is reported in this study. Melanoma cells (A375 cell line) were treated with various concentrations of Hyp or AlPcS(4)Cl alone, for 1, 4, and 24 hrs; varying doses of laser irradiation alone (594 or 682 nm); or optimal concentrations of PSs combined with laser irradiation. Changes in cell morphology, viability, membrane integrity, and proliferation after treatment of cells were determined using inverted microscopy, Trypan blue cell exclusion, Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) membrane integrity, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) cell proliferation assay, respectively. More than 60% of cell survival was observed when cells were treated with 2.5 μM of Hyp or AlPcS(4)Cl alone at all incubation times or with 5 J/cm(2) of 594 or 682 nm laser alone. Combination of PSs and respective lasers leads to a statistically significant incubation time-dependent decrease in survival of cells. Flow cytometry using the FITC Annexin V/PI apoptosis kit demonstrated that cell death induced after Hyp-PDT is via early and late apoptosis whereas early apoptosis was the main mechanism observed with AlPcS(4)Cl-PDT. Hyp-PDT compared to AlPcS(4)Cl-PDT is indicated to be a more effective cancer cell death inducer in melanoma cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56328922017-11-16 Susceptibility of In Vitro Melanoma Skin Cancer to Photoactivated Hypericin versus Aluminium(III) Phthalocyanine Chloride Tetrasulphonate Ndhundhuma, I. M. Abrahamse, H. Biomed Res Int Research Article The sensitivity of human melanoma cells to photoactivated Hypericin (Hyp) compared to aluminium(III) phthalocyanine chloride tetrasulphonate (AlPcS(4)Cl) is reported in this study. Melanoma cells (A375 cell line) were treated with various concentrations of Hyp or AlPcS(4)Cl alone, for 1, 4, and 24 hrs; varying doses of laser irradiation alone (594 or 682 nm); or optimal concentrations of PSs combined with laser irradiation. Changes in cell morphology, viability, membrane integrity, and proliferation after treatment of cells were determined using inverted microscopy, Trypan blue cell exclusion, Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) membrane integrity, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) cell proliferation assay, respectively. More than 60% of cell survival was observed when cells were treated with 2.5 μM of Hyp or AlPcS(4)Cl alone at all incubation times or with 5 J/cm(2) of 594 or 682 nm laser alone. Combination of PSs and respective lasers leads to a statistically significant incubation time-dependent decrease in survival of cells. Flow cytometry using the FITC Annexin V/PI apoptosis kit demonstrated that cell death induced after Hyp-PDT is via early and late apoptosis whereas early apoptosis was the main mechanism observed with AlPcS(4)Cl-PDT. Hyp-PDT compared to AlPcS(4)Cl-PDT is indicated to be a more effective cancer cell death inducer in melanoma cells. Hindawi 2017 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5632892/ /pubmed/29147654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5407012 Text en Copyright © 2017 I. M. Ndhundhuma and H. Abrahamse. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ndhundhuma, I. M.
Abrahamse, H.
Susceptibility of In Vitro Melanoma Skin Cancer to Photoactivated Hypericin versus Aluminium(III) Phthalocyanine Chloride Tetrasulphonate
title Susceptibility of In Vitro Melanoma Skin Cancer to Photoactivated Hypericin versus Aluminium(III) Phthalocyanine Chloride Tetrasulphonate
title_full Susceptibility of In Vitro Melanoma Skin Cancer to Photoactivated Hypericin versus Aluminium(III) Phthalocyanine Chloride Tetrasulphonate
title_fullStr Susceptibility of In Vitro Melanoma Skin Cancer to Photoactivated Hypericin versus Aluminium(III) Phthalocyanine Chloride Tetrasulphonate
title_full_unstemmed Susceptibility of In Vitro Melanoma Skin Cancer to Photoactivated Hypericin versus Aluminium(III) Phthalocyanine Chloride Tetrasulphonate
title_short Susceptibility of In Vitro Melanoma Skin Cancer to Photoactivated Hypericin versus Aluminium(III) Phthalocyanine Chloride Tetrasulphonate
title_sort susceptibility of in vitro melanoma skin cancer to photoactivated hypericin versus aluminium(iii) phthalocyanine chloride tetrasulphonate
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29147654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/5407012
work_keys_str_mv AT ndhundhumaim susceptibilityofinvitromelanomaskincancertophotoactivatedhypericinversusaluminiumiiiphthalocyaninechloridetetrasulphonate
AT abrahamseh susceptibilityofinvitromelanomaskincancertophotoactivatedhypericinversusaluminiumiiiphthalocyaninechloridetetrasulphonate