Cargando…

Missing the Benefit of Metformin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Problem of Contrast?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether metformin's cancer-related benefits reported in patients with solid tumors (ST) are also present in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. METHODS: Baseline demographic and clinical history for all diabetes mellitus patients newly diagnosed with AML or cancer of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ceacareanu, Alice C., Nimako, George K., Wintrob, Zachary A. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026839
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_17_37
_version_ 1783269797205639168
author Ceacareanu, Alice C.
Nimako, George K.
Wintrob, Zachary A. P.
author_facet Ceacareanu, Alice C.
Nimako, George K.
Wintrob, Zachary A. P.
author_sort Ceacareanu, Alice C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether metformin's cancer-related benefits reported in patients with solid tumors (ST) are also present in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. METHODS: Baseline demographic and clinical history for all diabetes mellitus patients newly diagnosed with AML or cancer of the breast, ovary, prostate, gastrointestinal tract, lung, or kidney at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, NY (January 2003–December 2010, n = 924) was collected. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression (hazard ratio [HR]). FINDINGS: Baseline metformin use provided significant OS and DFS benefit in ST but not in AML (KM: P(ST-OS)= 0.003; P(ST-DFS)= 0.002; P(AML-OS)= 0.961; P(AML-DFS)= 0.943). AML median survival was slightly better with metformin use, but users derived no relapse benefit. In ST, metformin nonusers had shorter median survival, 57.7 versus 86 months, and poorer outcomes (HR(ST-OS)= 1.33; P(ST-OS)= 0.002; HR(ST-DFS)= 1.32; P(ST-DFS)= 0.002). These findings remained significant in age-adjusted models (HR(ST-OS)= 1.21; P(ST-OS)= 0.039; HR(ST-DFS)= 1.23; P(ST-DFS)= 0.02) but not fully adjusted models (HR(ST-OS)= 0.96; P(ST-OS)= 0.688; HR(ST-DFS)= 1.0; P(ST-DFS)= 0.94). Higher mortality was noted in AML patients taking insulin versus oral diabetes pharmacotherapy at baseline (HR(AML-OS)= 2.03; P(AML-OS)= 0.04). CONCLUSION: Lack of metformin benefit in AML could be due to advanced age at cancer diagnosis. Metformin substitution with insulin before computed tomography scans with contrast – a frequent AML assessment practice – may also explain the lack of subsequent benefit despite taking metformin at baseline. A temporary metformin substitution is recommended by the package insert due to a possible drug interaction with the contrast dye. Our data suggest that metformin substitution was permanent in many patients. Nonetheless, the observed benefit in other malignancies warrants further investigation of metformin use in AML.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5632934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56329342017-10-12 Missing the Benefit of Metformin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Problem of Contrast? Ceacareanu, Alice C. Nimako, George K. Wintrob, Zachary A. P. J Res Pharm Pract Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether metformin's cancer-related benefits reported in patients with solid tumors (ST) are also present in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. METHODS: Baseline demographic and clinical history for all diabetes mellitus patients newly diagnosed with AML or cancer of the breast, ovary, prostate, gastrointestinal tract, lung, or kidney at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, NY (January 2003–December 2010, n = 924) was collected. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression (hazard ratio [HR]). FINDINGS: Baseline metformin use provided significant OS and DFS benefit in ST but not in AML (KM: P(ST-OS)= 0.003; P(ST-DFS)= 0.002; P(AML-OS)= 0.961; P(AML-DFS)= 0.943). AML median survival was slightly better with metformin use, but users derived no relapse benefit. In ST, metformin nonusers had shorter median survival, 57.7 versus 86 months, and poorer outcomes (HR(ST-OS)= 1.33; P(ST-OS)= 0.002; HR(ST-DFS)= 1.32; P(ST-DFS)= 0.002). These findings remained significant in age-adjusted models (HR(ST-OS)= 1.21; P(ST-OS)= 0.039; HR(ST-DFS)= 1.23; P(ST-DFS)= 0.02) but not fully adjusted models (HR(ST-OS)= 0.96; P(ST-OS)= 0.688; HR(ST-DFS)= 1.0; P(ST-DFS)= 0.94). Higher mortality was noted in AML patients taking insulin versus oral diabetes pharmacotherapy at baseline (HR(AML-OS)= 2.03; P(AML-OS)= 0.04). CONCLUSION: Lack of metformin benefit in AML could be due to advanced age at cancer diagnosis. Metformin substitution with insulin before computed tomography scans with contrast – a frequent AML assessment practice – may also explain the lack of subsequent benefit despite taking metformin at baseline. A temporary metformin substitution is recommended by the package insert due to a possible drug interaction with the contrast dye. Our data suggest that metformin substitution was permanent in many patients. Nonetheless, the observed benefit in other malignancies warrants further investigation of metformin use in AML. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5632934/ /pubmed/29026839 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_17_37 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ceacareanu, Alice C.
Nimako, George K.
Wintrob, Zachary A. P.
Missing the Benefit of Metformin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Problem of Contrast?
title Missing the Benefit of Metformin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Problem of Contrast?
title_full Missing the Benefit of Metformin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Problem of Contrast?
title_fullStr Missing the Benefit of Metformin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Problem of Contrast?
title_full_unstemmed Missing the Benefit of Metformin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Problem of Contrast?
title_short Missing the Benefit of Metformin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Problem of Contrast?
title_sort missing the benefit of metformin in acute myeloid leukemia: a problem of contrast?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5632934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026839
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_17_37
work_keys_str_mv AT ceacareanualicec missingthebenefitofmetformininacutemyeloidleukemiaaproblemofcontrast
AT nimakogeorgek missingthebenefitofmetformininacutemyeloidleukemiaaproblemofcontrast
AT wintrobzacharyap missingthebenefitofmetformininacutemyeloidleukemiaaproblemofcontrast