Cargando…
Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?
Peer review is the gold standard for scientific communication, but its ability to guarantee the quality of published research remains difficult to verify. Recent modeling studies suggest that peer review is sensitive to reviewer misbehavior, and it has been claimed that referees who sabotage work th...
Autores principales: | D’Andrea, Rafael, O’Dwyer, James P. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5633172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29016678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186111 |
Ejemplares similares
-
From the Editor: Preprint or Not—The Role of Peer Review
por: Prucha, Thomas
Publicado: (2021) -
Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
por: Hamilton, Daniel G, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Artificial intelligence in peer review: How can evolutionary computation support journal editors?
por: Mrowinski, Maciej J., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers’ confidential comments to editors
por: O’Brien, Bridget C., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process
por: Giordan, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2016)