Cargando…

Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records

Earlier detection of colorectal cancer greatly improves prognosis, largely through surgical excision of neoplastic polyps. These include benign adenomas which can transform over time to malignant adenocarcinomas. This progression may be associated with changes in full blood count indices. An existin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birks, Jacqueline, Bankhead, Clare, Holt, Tim A., Fuller, Alice, Patnick, Julietta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5633543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28941187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1183
_version_ 1783269908892614656
author Birks, Jacqueline
Bankhead, Clare
Holt, Tim A.
Fuller, Alice
Patnick, Julietta
author_facet Birks, Jacqueline
Bankhead, Clare
Holt, Tim A.
Fuller, Alice
Patnick, Julietta
author_sort Birks, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description Earlier detection of colorectal cancer greatly improves prognosis, largely through surgical excision of neoplastic polyps. These include benign adenomas which can transform over time to malignant adenocarcinomas. This progression may be associated with changes in full blood count indices. An existing risk algorithm derived in Israel stratifies individuals according to colorectal cancer risk using full blood count data, but has not been validated in the UK. We undertook a retrospective analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients aged over 40 with full blood count data were risk‐stratified and followed up for a diagnosis of colorectal cancer over a range of time intervals. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the 18–24‐month interval. We also undertook a case–control analysis (matching for age, sex, and year of risk score), and a cohort study of patients undergoing full blood count testing during 2012, to estimate predictive values. We included 2,550,119 patients. The area under the curve for the 18–24‐month interval was 0.776 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.771, 0.781]. Performance improves as the time interval reduces. The area under the curve for the age‐matched case–control analysis was 0.583 [0.574, 0.591]. For the population risk‐scored in 2012, the positive predictive value at 99.5% specificity was 8.8% with negative predictive value 99.6%. The algorithm offers an additional means of identifying risk of colorectal cancer, and could support other approaches to early detection, including screening and active case finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5633543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56335432017-10-17 Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records Birks, Jacqueline Bankhead, Clare Holt, Tim A. Fuller, Alice Patnick, Julietta Cancer Med Cancer Prevention Earlier detection of colorectal cancer greatly improves prognosis, largely through surgical excision of neoplastic polyps. These include benign adenomas which can transform over time to malignant adenocarcinomas. This progression may be associated with changes in full blood count indices. An existing risk algorithm derived in Israel stratifies individuals according to colorectal cancer risk using full blood count data, but has not been validated in the UK. We undertook a retrospective analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients aged over 40 with full blood count data were risk‐stratified and followed up for a diagnosis of colorectal cancer over a range of time intervals. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the 18–24‐month interval. We also undertook a case–control analysis (matching for age, sex, and year of risk score), and a cohort study of patients undergoing full blood count testing during 2012, to estimate predictive values. We included 2,550,119 patients. The area under the curve for the 18–24‐month interval was 0.776 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.771, 0.781]. Performance improves as the time interval reduces. The area under the curve for the age‐matched case–control analysis was 0.583 [0.574, 0.591]. For the population risk‐scored in 2012, the positive predictive value at 99.5% specificity was 8.8% with negative predictive value 99.6%. The algorithm offers an additional means of identifying risk of colorectal cancer, and could support other approaches to early detection, including screening and active case finding. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5633543/ /pubmed/28941187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1183 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Birks, Jacqueline
Bankhead, Clare
Holt, Tim A.
Fuller, Alice
Patnick, Julietta
Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records
title Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records
title_full Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records
title_fullStr Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records
title_short Evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records
title_sort evaluation of a prediction model for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 2.5 million patient records
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5633543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28941187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1183
work_keys_str_mv AT birksjacqueline evaluationofapredictionmodelforcolorectalcancerretrospectiveanalysisof25millionpatientrecords
AT bankheadclare evaluationofapredictionmodelforcolorectalcancerretrospectiveanalysisof25millionpatientrecords
AT holttima evaluationofapredictionmodelforcolorectalcancerretrospectiveanalysisof25millionpatientrecords
AT fulleralice evaluationofapredictionmodelforcolorectalcancerretrospectiveanalysisof25millionpatientrecords
AT patnickjulietta evaluationofapredictionmodelforcolorectalcancerretrospectiveanalysisof25millionpatientrecords