Cargando…

Preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free DNA analysis using Droplet Digital PCR for future molecular cancer diagnostics

In current molecular cancer diagnostics, using blood samples of cancer patients for the detection of genetic alterations in plasma (cell‐free) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging practice. Since ctDNA levels in blood are low, highly sensitive Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) can be used for dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Ginkel, Joost H., van den Broek, Daan A., van Kuik, Joyce, Linders, Dorothé, de Weger, Roel, Willems, Stefan M., Huibers, Manon M. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5633557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28940814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1184
_version_ 1783269912156831744
author van Ginkel, Joost H.
van den Broek, Daan A.
van Kuik, Joyce
Linders, Dorothé
de Weger, Roel
Willems, Stefan M.
Huibers, Manon M. H.
author_facet van Ginkel, Joost H.
van den Broek, Daan A.
van Kuik, Joyce
Linders, Dorothé
de Weger, Roel
Willems, Stefan M.
Huibers, Manon M. H.
author_sort van Ginkel, Joost H.
collection PubMed
description In current molecular cancer diagnostics, using blood samples of cancer patients for the detection of genetic alterations in plasma (cell‐free) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging practice. Since ctDNA levels in blood are low, highly sensitive Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) can be used for detecting rare mutational targets. In order to perform ddPCR on blood samples, a standardized procedure for processing and analyzing blood samples is necessary to facilitate implementation into clinical practice. Therefore, we assessed the technical sample workup procedure for ddPCR on blood plasma samples. Blood samples from healthy individuals, as well as lung cancer patients were analyzed. We compared different methods and protocols for sample collection, storage, centrifugation, isolation, and quantification. Cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations of several wild‐type targets and BRAF and EGFR‐mutant ctDNA concentrations quantified by ddPCR were primary outcome measurements. Highest cfDNA concentrations were measured in blood collected in serum tubes. No significant differences in cfDNA concentrations were detected between various time points of up to 24 h until centrifugation. Highest cfDNA concentrations were detected after DNA isolation with the Quick cfDNA Serum & Plasma Kit, while plasma isolation using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit yielded the most consistent results. DdPCR results on cfDNA are highly dependent on multiple factors during preanalytical sample workup, which need to be addressed during the development of this diagnostic tool for cancer diagnostics in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5633557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56335572017-10-17 Preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free DNA analysis using Droplet Digital PCR for future molecular cancer diagnostics van Ginkel, Joost H. van den Broek, Daan A. van Kuik, Joyce Linders, Dorothé de Weger, Roel Willems, Stefan M. Huibers, Manon M. H. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research In current molecular cancer diagnostics, using blood samples of cancer patients for the detection of genetic alterations in plasma (cell‐free) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging practice. Since ctDNA levels in blood are low, highly sensitive Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) can be used for detecting rare mutational targets. In order to perform ddPCR on blood samples, a standardized procedure for processing and analyzing blood samples is necessary to facilitate implementation into clinical practice. Therefore, we assessed the technical sample workup procedure for ddPCR on blood plasma samples. Blood samples from healthy individuals, as well as lung cancer patients were analyzed. We compared different methods and protocols for sample collection, storage, centrifugation, isolation, and quantification. Cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations of several wild‐type targets and BRAF and EGFR‐mutant ctDNA concentrations quantified by ddPCR were primary outcome measurements. Highest cfDNA concentrations were measured in blood collected in serum tubes. No significant differences in cfDNA concentrations were detected between various time points of up to 24 h until centrifugation. Highest cfDNA concentrations were detected after DNA isolation with the Quick cfDNA Serum & Plasma Kit, while plasma isolation using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit yielded the most consistent results. DdPCR results on cfDNA are highly dependent on multiple factors during preanalytical sample workup, which need to be addressed during the development of this diagnostic tool for cancer diagnostics in the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5633557/ /pubmed/28940814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1184 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
van Ginkel, Joost H.
van den Broek, Daan A.
van Kuik, Joyce
Linders, Dorothé
de Weger, Roel
Willems, Stefan M.
Huibers, Manon M. H.
Preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free DNA analysis using Droplet Digital PCR for future molecular cancer diagnostics
title Preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free DNA analysis using Droplet Digital PCR for future molecular cancer diagnostics
title_full Preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free DNA analysis using Droplet Digital PCR for future molecular cancer diagnostics
title_fullStr Preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free DNA analysis using Droplet Digital PCR for future molecular cancer diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free DNA analysis using Droplet Digital PCR for future molecular cancer diagnostics
title_short Preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free DNA analysis using Droplet Digital PCR for future molecular cancer diagnostics
title_sort preanalytical blood sample workup for cell‐free dna analysis using droplet digital pcr for future molecular cancer diagnostics
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5633557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28940814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1184
work_keys_str_mv AT vanginkeljoosth preanalyticalbloodsampleworkupforcellfreednaanalysisusingdropletdigitalpcrforfuturemolecularcancerdiagnostics
AT vandenbroekdaana preanalyticalbloodsampleworkupforcellfreednaanalysisusingdropletdigitalpcrforfuturemolecularcancerdiagnostics
AT vankuikjoyce preanalyticalbloodsampleworkupforcellfreednaanalysisusingdropletdigitalpcrforfuturemolecularcancerdiagnostics
AT lindersdorothe preanalyticalbloodsampleworkupforcellfreednaanalysisusingdropletdigitalpcrforfuturemolecularcancerdiagnostics
AT dewegerroel preanalyticalbloodsampleworkupforcellfreednaanalysisusingdropletdigitalpcrforfuturemolecularcancerdiagnostics
AT willemsstefanm preanalyticalbloodsampleworkupforcellfreednaanalysisusingdropletdigitalpcrforfuturemolecularcancerdiagnostics
AT huibersmanonmh preanalyticalbloodsampleworkupforcellfreednaanalysisusingdropletdigitalpcrforfuturemolecularcancerdiagnostics