Cargando…

The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling

BACKGROUND: RT-qPCR is routinely used in expression profiling of toxicity pathway genes. However, genetic and molecular level studies used to determine, understand and clarify potential risks of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are still incomplete. Concerns regarding possible interference caused by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanabria, Natasha M., Gulumian, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5633869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0299-9
_version_ 1783269970138890240
author Sanabria, Natasha M.
Gulumian, Mary
author_facet Sanabria, Natasha M.
Gulumian, Mary
author_sort Sanabria, Natasha M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: RT-qPCR is routinely used in expression profiling of toxicity pathway genes. However, genetic and molecular level studies used to determine, understand and clarify potential risks of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are still incomplete. Concerns regarding possible interference caused by intracellular ENMs during analyses have been raised. The aim of this study was to verify a qPCR procedure for gene expression assays, which can be used in toxicity and exposure assessments. RESULTS: Amplification of ten reference genes was performed to test the expression stability. A preliminary study was performed on RNA from BEAS-2B cells that had been treated with AuNPs. Also, a reference total RNA standard from ten cell lines was spiked with various amounts of the same AuNP. This treatment mimics exposure assessment studies, where assay-interference may be caused by intracellular residual ENMs still being present in the biological samples (during and after isolation/purification procedures). Both types of RNA samples were reverse transcribed and then amplified by qPCR. The qPCR-related software and statistical programs used included BestKeeper, NormFinder, REST and qBase+. These results proved that using standard qPCR analysis and statistical programs should not be the only procedure applied to verify the assay for gene expression assessment related to ENMs. A comparison of SYBR Green to EVA Green was discussed, in addition to a comparison to the latest reports regarding the influence of ENM thermal conductivity, surface interactions with ENMs, effects of ENM size and charge, as well as, the limit of detection in a qPCR assay. CONCLUSIONS: AuNPs have the potential to interfere with the assay mechanism of RT-qPCR, thus, assay verification is required for AuNP-related gene expression studies used to evaluate toxicity. It is recommended to use HSP90 and YWHAZ as reference genes, i.e. these were the most stable in our study, irrespective of the source of the RNA, or, the point at which the AuNPs interacted with the assay. This report describes steps that can be utilised to generate a suitable method for gene expression studies associated with toxicity testing of various ENMs. For example, RNA standards that have been spiked with known amounts of ENMs should be run in conjunction with the unknown samples, in order to verify any RT-qPCR assay and determine the degree of error. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12951-017-0299-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5633869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56338692017-10-19 The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling Sanabria, Natasha M. Gulumian, Mary J Nanobiotechnology Research BACKGROUND: RT-qPCR is routinely used in expression profiling of toxicity pathway genes. However, genetic and molecular level studies used to determine, understand and clarify potential risks of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are still incomplete. Concerns regarding possible interference caused by intracellular ENMs during analyses have been raised. The aim of this study was to verify a qPCR procedure for gene expression assays, which can be used in toxicity and exposure assessments. RESULTS: Amplification of ten reference genes was performed to test the expression stability. A preliminary study was performed on RNA from BEAS-2B cells that had been treated with AuNPs. Also, a reference total RNA standard from ten cell lines was spiked with various amounts of the same AuNP. This treatment mimics exposure assessment studies, where assay-interference may be caused by intracellular residual ENMs still being present in the biological samples (during and after isolation/purification procedures). Both types of RNA samples were reverse transcribed and then amplified by qPCR. The qPCR-related software and statistical programs used included BestKeeper, NormFinder, REST and qBase+. These results proved that using standard qPCR analysis and statistical programs should not be the only procedure applied to verify the assay for gene expression assessment related to ENMs. A comparison of SYBR Green to EVA Green was discussed, in addition to a comparison to the latest reports regarding the influence of ENM thermal conductivity, surface interactions with ENMs, effects of ENM size and charge, as well as, the limit of detection in a qPCR assay. CONCLUSIONS: AuNPs have the potential to interfere with the assay mechanism of RT-qPCR, thus, assay verification is required for AuNP-related gene expression studies used to evaluate toxicity. It is recommended to use HSP90 and YWHAZ as reference genes, i.e. these were the most stable in our study, irrespective of the source of the RNA, or, the point at which the AuNPs interacted with the assay. This report describes steps that can be utilised to generate a suitable method for gene expression studies associated with toxicity testing of various ENMs. For example, RNA standards that have been spiked with known amounts of ENMs should be run in conjunction with the unknown samples, in order to verify any RT-qPCR assay and determine the degree of error. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12951-017-0299-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5633869/ /pubmed/29017502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0299-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sanabria, Natasha M.
Gulumian, Mary
The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling
title The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling
title_full The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling
title_fullStr The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling
title_full_unstemmed The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling
title_short The presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the RT-qPCR assay used for gene expression profiling
title_sort presence of residual gold nanoparticles in samples interferes with the rt-qpcr assay used for gene expression profiling
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5633869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0299-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sanabrianatasham thepresenceofresidualgoldnanoparticlesinsamplesinterfereswiththertqpcrassayusedforgeneexpressionprofiling
AT gulumianmary thepresenceofresidualgoldnanoparticlesinsamplesinterfereswiththertqpcrassayusedforgeneexpressionprofiling
AT sanabrianatasham presenceofresidualgoldnanoparticlesinsamplesinterfereswiththertqpcrassayusedforgeneexpressionprofiling
AT gulumianmary presenceofresidualgoldnanoparticlesinsamplesinterfereswiththertqpcrassayusedforgeneexpressionprofiling