Cargando…

Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods From Insect Larvae

Isolating RNA from insects is becoming increasingly important in molecular entomology. Four methods including three commercial kits RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), SV Total RNA isolation system (Promega), TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and a cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based method were compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridgeway, J. A., Timm, A. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25527580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu130
_version_ 1783270002923667456
author Ridgeway, J. A.
Timm, A. E.
author_facet Ridgeway, J. A.
Timm, A. E.
author_sort Ridgeway, J. A.
collection PubMed
description Isolating RNA from insects is becoming increasingly important in molecular entomology. Four methods including three commercial kits RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), SV Total RNA isolation system (Promega), TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and a cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based method were compared regarding their ability to isolate RNA from whole-body larvae of Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick), Thanatophilus micans (F.), Plutella xylostella (L.), and Tenebrio molitor (L.). A difference was observed among the four methods regarding RNA quality but not quantity. However, RNA quality and quantity obtained was not dependent on the insect species. The CTAB-based method produced low-quality RNA and the Trizol reagent produced partially degraded RNA, whereas the RNeasy Mini Kit and SV Total RNA isolation system produced RNA of consistently high quality. However, after reverse transcription to cDNA, RNA produced using all four extraction methods could be used to successfully amplify a 708 bp fragment of the cytochrome oxidase I gene. Of the four methods, the SV Total RNA isolation system showed the least amount of DNA contamination with the highest RNA integrity number and is thus recommended for stringent applications where high-quality RNA is required. This is the first comparison of RNA isolation methods among different insect species and the first to compare RNA isolation methods in insects in the last 20 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5634029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56340292018-04-05 Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods From Insect Larvae Ridgeway, J. A. Timm, A. E. J Insect Sci Research Isolating RNA from insects is becoming increasingly important in molecular entomology. Four methods including three commercial kits RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), SV Total RNA isolation system (Promega), TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and a cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based method were compared regarding their ability to isolate RNA from whole-body larvae of Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick), Thanatophilus micans (F.), Plutella xylostella (L.), and Tenebrio molitor (L.). A difference was observed among the four methods regarding RNA quality but not quantity. However, RNA quality and quantity obtained was not dependent on the insect species. The CTAB-based method produced low-quality RNA and the Trizol reagent produced partially degraded RNA, whereas the RNeasy Mini Kit and SV Total RNA isolation system produced RNA of consistently high quality. However, after reverse transcription to cDNA, RNA produced using all four extraction methods could be used to successfully amplify a 708 bp fragment of the cytochrome oxidase I gene. Of the four methods, the SV Total RNA isolation system showed the least amount of DNA contamination with the highest RNA integrity number and is thus recommended for stringent applications where high-quality RNA is required. This is the first comparison of RNA isolation methods among different insect species and the first to compare RNA isolation methods in insects in the last 20 years. Oxford University Press 2014-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5634029/ /pubmed/25527580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu130 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Entomological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research
Ridgeway, J. A.
Timm, A. E.
Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods From Insect Larvae
title Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods From Insect Larvae
title_full Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods From Insect Larvae
title_fullStr Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods From Insect Larvae
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods From Insect Larvae
title_short Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods From Insect Larvae
title_sort comparison of rna isolation methods from insect larvae
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25527580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu130
work_keys_str_mv AT ridgewayja comparisonofrnaisolationmethodsfrominsectlarvae
AT timmae comparisonofrnaisolationmethodsfrominsectlarvae