Cargando…
Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis
BACKGROUND: Circulating endometrial cells (CECs) have been reported to be present in the peripheral blood of women with endometriosis (EM), providing clear and specific evidence of the presence of ectopic lesions. In this study, we established a method with a high detection rate of CECs, assessed th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.215325 |
_version_ | 1783270016320274432 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ying Zhu, Hong-Lan Tang, Zhe-Wen Neoh, Kuang Hong Ouyang, Dong-Fang Cui, Heng Cheng, Hong-Yan Ma, Rui-Qiong Ye, Xue Han, Ray P. S. Chang, Xiao-Hong |
author_facet | Chen, Ying Zhu, Hong-Lan Tang, Zhe-Wen Neoh, Kuang Hong Ouyang, Dong-Fang Cui, Heng Cheng, Hong-Yan Ma, Rui-Qiong Ye, Xue Han, Ray P. S. Chang, Xiao-Hong |
author_sort | Chen, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Circulating endometrial cells (CECs) have been reported to be present in the peripheral blood of women with endometriosis (EM), providing clear and specific evidence of the presence of ectopic lesions. In this study, we established a method with a high detection rate of CECs, assessed the diagnostic value of CECs for EM and compared with serum CA125, and proposed a hypothesis for the pathogenesis of EM from the new perspective of CECs. METHODS: The participants were enrolled prospectively from October 2015 to July 2016. The peripheral blood samples were collected from 59 participants, and the blood cells were isolated for immunofluorescence staining via microfluidic chips. The cells that were positive for vimentin/cytokeratin and estrogen/progesterone receptor and negative for CD45 were identified as CECs. The serum CA125 level was tested with electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. RESULTS: The detection rate of CECs reached 89.5% (17/19) in the EM group, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (15.0% [6/40], P < 0.001) and was independent of menstrual cycle phases. Furthermore, a positive CEC assay detected 4/5 cases of Stage I–II EM. In contrast, a positive CA125 test had limited value in detecting EM (13/19, 68.4%) and detected only one case of Stage I–II EM. CONCLUSION: CECs are promising biomarkers for EM with great potential for a noninvasive diagnostic assay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5634086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56340862017-10-11 Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis Chen, Ying Zhu, Hong-Lan Tang, Zhe-Wen Neoh, Kuang Hong Ouyang, Dong-Fang Cui, Heng Cheng, Hong-Yan Ma, Rui-Qiong Ye, Xue Han, Ray P. S. Chang, Xiao-Hong Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Circulating endometrial cells (CECs) have been reported to be present in the peripheral blood of women with endometriosis (EM), providing clear and specific evidence of the presence of ectopic lesions. In this study, we established a method with a high detection rate of CECs, assessed the diagnostic value of CECs for EM and compared with serum CA125, and proposed a hypothesis for the pathogenesis of EM from the new perspective of CECs. METHODS: The participants were enrolled prospectively from October 2015 to July 2016. The peripheral blood samples were collected from 59 participants, and the blood cells were isolated for immunofluorescence staining via microfluidic chips. The cells that were positive for vimentin/cytokeratin and estrogen/progesterone receptor and negative for CD45 were identified as CECs. The serum CA125 level was tested with electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. RESULTS: The detection rate of CECs reached 89.5% (17/19) in the EM group, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (15.0% [6/40], P < 0.001) and was independent of menstrual cycle phases. Furthermore, a positive CEC assay detected 4/5 cases of Stage I–II EM. In contrast, a positive CA125 test had limited value in detecting EM (13/19, 68.4%) and detected only one case of Stage I–II EM. CONCLUSION: CECs are promising biomarkers for EM with great potential for a noninvasive diagnostic assay. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5634086/ /pubmed/28937041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.215325 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chen, Ying Zhu, Hong-Lan Tang, Zhe-Wen Neoh, Kuang Hong Ouyang, Dong-Fang Cui, Heng Cheng, Hong-Yan Ma, Rui-Qiong Ye, Xue Han, Ray P. S. Chang, Xiao-Hong Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis |
title | Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis |
title_full | Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis |
title_short | Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis |
title_sort | evaluation of circulating endometrial cells as a biomarker for endometriosis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.215325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenying evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT zhuhonglan evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT tangzhewen evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT neohkuanghong evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT ouyangdongfang evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT cuiheng evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT chenghongyan evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT maruiqiong evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT yexue evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT hanrayps evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis AT changxiaohong evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis |