Cargando…

Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis

BACKGROUND: Circulating endometrial cells (CECs) have been reported to be present in the peripheral blood of women with endometriosis (EM), providing clear and specific evidence of the presence of ectopic lesions. In this study, we established a method with a high detection rate of CECs, assessed th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ying, Zhu, Hong-Lan, Tang, Zhe-Wen, Neoh, Kuang Hong, Ouyang, Dong-Fang, Cui, Heng, Cheng, Hong-Yan, Ma, Rui-Qiong, Ye, Xue, Han, Ray P. S., Chang, Xiao-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937041
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.215325
_version_ 1783270016320274432
author Chen, Ying
Zhu, Hong-Lan
Tang, Zhe-Wen
Neoh, Kuang Hong
Ouyang, Dong-Fang
Cui, Heng
Cheng, Hong-Yan
Ma, Rui-Qiong
Ye, Xue
Han, Ray P. S.
Chang, Xiao-Hong
author_facet Chen, Ying
Zhu, Hong-Lan
Tang, Zhe-Wen
Neoh, Kuang Hong
Ouyang, Dong-Fang
Cui, Heng
Cheng, Hong-Yan
Ma, Rui-Qiong
Ye, Xue
Han, Ray P. S.
Chang, Xiao-Hong
author_sort Chen, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Circulating endometrial cells (CECs) have been reported to be present in the peripheral blood of women with endometriosis (EM), providing clear and specific evidence of the presence of ectopic lesions. In this study, we established a method with a high detection rate of CECs, assessed the diagnostic value of CECs for EM and compared with serum CA125, and proposed a hypothesis for the pathogenesis of EM from the new perspective of CECs. METHODS: The participants were enrolled prospectively from October 2015 to July 2016. The peripheral blood samples were collected from 59 participants, and the blood cells were isolated for immunofluorescence staining via microfluidic chips. The cells that were positive for vimentin/cytokeratin and estrogen/progesterone receptor and negative for CD45 were identified as CECs. The serum CA125 level was tested with electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. RESULTS: The detection rate of CECs reached 89.5% (17/19) in the EM group, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (15.0% [6/40], P < 0.001) and was independent of menstrual cycle phases. Furthermore, a positive CEC assay detected 4/5 cases of Stage I–II EM. In contrast, a positive CA125 test had limited value in detecting EM (13/19, 68.4%) and detected only one case of Stage I–II EM. CONCLUSION: CECs are promising biomarkers for EM with great potential for a noninvasive diagnostic assay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5634086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56340862017-10-11 Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis Chen, Ying Zhu, Hong-Lan Tang, Zhe-Wen Neoh, Kuang Hong Ouyang, Dong-Fang Cui, Heng Cheng, Hong-Yan Ma, Rui-Qiong Ye, Xue Han, Ray P. S. Chang, Xiao-Hong Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Circulating endometrial cells (CECs) have been reported to be present in the peripheral blood of women with endometriosis (EM), providing clear and specific evidence of the presence of ectopic lesions. In this study, we established a method with a high detection rate of CECs, assessed the diagnostic value of CECs for EM and compared with serum CA125, and proposed a hypothesis for the pathogenesis of EM from the new perspective of CECs. METHODS: The participants were enrolled prospectively from October 2015 to July 2016. The peripheral blood samples were collected from 59 participants, and the blood cells were isolated for immunofluorescence staining via microfluidic chips. The cells that were positive for vimentin/cytokeratin and estrogen/progesterone receptor and negative for CD45 were identified as CECs. The serum CA125 level was tested with electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. RESULTS: The detection rate of CECs reached 89.5% (17/19) in the EM group, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (15.0% [6/40], P < 0.001) and was independent of menstrual cycle phases. Furthermore, a positive CEC assay detected 4/5 cases of Stage I–II EM. In contrast, a positive CA125 test had limited value in detecting EM (13/19, 68.4%) and detected only one case of Stage I–II EM. CONCLUSION: CECs are promising biomarkers for EM with great potential for a noninvasive diagnostic assay. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5634086/ /pubmed/28937041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.215325 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Ying
Zhu, Hong-Lan
Tang, Zhe-Wen
Neoh, Kuang Hong
Ouyang, Dong-Fang
Cui, Heng
Cheng, Hong-Yan
Ma, Rui-Qiong
Ye, Xue
Han, Ray P. S.
Chang, Xiao-Hong
Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis
title Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis
title_full Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis
title_short Evaluation of Circulating Endometrial Cells as a Biomarker for Endometriosis
title_sort evaluation of circulating endometrial cells as a biomarker for endometriosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28937041
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.215325
work_keys_str_mv AT chenying evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT zhuhonglan evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT tangzhewen evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT neohkuanghong evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT ouyangdongfang evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT cuiheng evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT chenghongyan evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT maruiqiong evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT yexue evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT hanrayps evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis
AT changxiaohong evaluationofcirculatingendometrialcellsasabiomarkerforendometriosis