Cargando…
Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction
BACKGROUND: Various combinations of creatine kinase‐MB, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin I or T (cTnI/cTnT) have been used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. The current recommendation is to use the 99th percentile of cTnI/cTnT as the sole marker for diagnosis of acute myoc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28939707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005852 |
_version_ | 1783270051318595584 |
---|---|
author | Hachey, Brian J. Kontos, Michael C. Newby, L. Kristin Christenson, Robert H. Peacock, W. Frank Brewer, Katherine C. McCord, James |
author_facet | Hachey, Brian J. Kontos, Michael C. Newby, L. Kristin Christenson, Robert H. Peacock, W. Frank Brewer, Katherine C. McCord, James |
author_sort | Hachey, Brian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various combinations of creatine kinase‐MB, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin I or T (cTnI/cTnT) have been used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. The current recommendation is to use the 99th percentile of cTnI/cTnT as the sole marker for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed cardiac marker protocols collected from 824 US hospitals undergoing Chest Pain Center Accreditation through the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care from 2009 to 2014. Data were obtained by a self‐reported survey that addressed cardiac marker(s), sampling time periods, and cut points used for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. The combination of cTnI or cTnT with creatine kinase‐MB was the most commonly used biomarker strategy. Use of cTnI or cTnT as the sole marker increased over time (14–37%; P<0.0001), as did use of the 99th percentile cut point for cTnI/cTnT (30–60%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation in cardiac marker testing strategies used in US hospitals for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Although increasing, 24% of hospitals used a cTn alone strategy, and only 49% used cTn at the recommended 99th percentile cut point. This has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5634258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56342582017-10-18 Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction Hachey, Brian J. Kontos, Michael C. Newby, L. Kristin Christenson, Robert H. Peacock, W. Frank Brewer, Katherine C. McCord, James J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Various combinations of creatine kinase‐MB, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin I or T (cTnI/cTnT) have been used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. The current recommendation is to use the 99th percentile of cTnI/cTnT as the sole marker for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed cardiac marker protocols collected from 824 US hospitals undergoing Chest Pain Center Accreditation through the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care from 2009 to 2014. Data were obtained by a self‐reported survey that addressed cardiac marker(s), sampling time periods, and cut points used for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. The combination of cTnI or cTnT with creatine kinase‐MB was the most commonly used biomarker strategy. Use of cTnI or cTnT as the sole marker increased over time (14–37%; P<0.0001), as did use of the 99th percentile cut point for cTnI/cTnT (30–60%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation in cardiac marker testing strategies used in US hospitals for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Although increasing, 24% of hospitals used a cTn alone strategy, and only 49% used cTn at the recommended 99th percentile cut point. This has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5634258/ /pubmed/28939707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005852 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hachey, Brian J. Kontos, Michael C. Newby, L. Kristin Christenson, Robert H. Peacock, W. Frank Brewer, Katherine C. McCord, James Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction |
title | Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction |
title_full | Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction |
title_fullStr | Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction |
title_short | Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction |
title_sort | trends in use of biomarker protocols for the evaluation of possible myocardial infarction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28939707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hacheybrianj trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction AT kontosmichaelc trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction AT newbylkristin trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction AT christensonroberth trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction AT peacockwfrank trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction AT brewerkatherinec trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction AT mccordjames trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction |