Cargando…

Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: Various combinations of creatine kinase‐MB, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin I or T (cTnI/cTnT) have been used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. The current recommendation is to use the 99th percentile of cTnI/cTnT as the sole marker for diagnosis of acute myoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hachey, Brian J., Kontos, Michael C., Newby, L. Kristin, Christenson, Robert H., Peacock, W. Frank, Brewer, Katherine C., McCord, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28939707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005852
_version_ 1783270051318595584
author Hachey, Brian J.
Kontos, Michael C.
Newby, L. Kristin
Christenson, Robert H.
Peacock, W. Frank
Brewer, Katherine C.
McCord, James
author_facet Hachey, Brian J.
Kontos, Michael C.
Newby, L. Kristin
Christenson, Robert H.
Peacock, W. Frank
Brewer, Katherine C.
McCord, James
author_sort Hachey, Brian J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various combinations of creatine kinase‐MB, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin I or T (cTnI/cTnT) have been used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. The current recommendation is to use the 99th percentile of cTnI/cTnT as the sole marker for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed cardiac marker protocols collected from 824 US hospitals undergoing Chest Pain Center Accreditation through the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care from 2009 to 2014. Data were obtained by a self‐reported survey that addressed cardiac marker(s), sampling time periods, and cut points used for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. The combination of cTnI or cTnT with creatine kinase‐MB was the most commonly used biomarker strategy. Use of cTnI or cTnT as the sole marker increased over time (14–37%; P<0.0001), as did use of the 99th percentile cut point for cTnI/cTnT (30–60%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation in cardiac marker testing strategies used in US hospitals for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Although increasing, 24% of hospitals used a cTn alone strategy, and only 49% used cTn at the recommended 99th percentile cut point. This has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5634258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56342582017-10-18 Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction Hachey, Brian J. Kontos, Michael C. Newby, L. Kristin Christenson, Robert H. Peacock, W. Frank Brewer, Katherine C. McCord, James J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Various combinations of creatine kinase‐MB, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin I or T (cTnI/cTnT) have been used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. The current recommendation is to use the 99th percentile of cTnI/cTnT as the sole marker for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed cardiac marker protocols collected from 824 US hospitals undergoing Chest Pain Center Accreditation through the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care from 2009 to 2014. Data were obtained by a self‐reported survey that addressed cardiac marker(s), sampling time periods, and cut points used for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. The combination of cTnI or cTnT with creatine kinase‐MB was the most commonly used biomarker strategy. Use of cTnI or cTnT as the sole marker increased over time (14–37%; P<0.0001), as did use of the 99th percentile cut point for cTnI/cTnT (30–60%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation in cardiac marker testing strategies used in US hospitals for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Although increasing, 24% of hospitals used a cTn alone strategy, and only 49% used cTn at the recommended 99th percentile cut point. This has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5634258/ /pubmed/28939707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005852 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hachey, Brian J.
Kontos, Michael C.
Newby, L. Kristin
Christenson, Robert H.
Peacock, W. Frank
Brewer, Katherine C.
McCord, James
Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction
title Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction
title_full Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction
title_short Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction
title_sort trends in use of biomarker protocols for the evaluation of possible myocardial infarction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28939707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005852
work_keys_str_mv AT hacheybrianj trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction
AT kontosmichaelc trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction
AT newbylkristin trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction
AT christensonroberth trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction
AT peacockwfrank trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction
AT brewerkatherinec trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction
AT mccordjames trendsinuseofbiomarkerprotocolsfortheevaluationofpossiblemyocardialinfarction