Cargando…

Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: INST 08‐20

LESSONS LEARNED. There continues to be a lack of systemic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); sorafenib and, very recently, regorafenib are the only approved options. There exists a potential to combine sorafenib with chemotherapeutic agents shown to be active in HCC, such as capeci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patt, Yehuda, Rojas‐Hernandez, Cristhiam, Fekrazad, Houman Mohammad, Bansal, Pranshu, Lee, Fa Chyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AlphaMed Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28687627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0168
_version_ 1783270158807072768
author Patt, Yehuda
Rojas‐Hernandez, Cristhiam
Fekrazad, Houman Mohammad
Bansal, Pranshu
Lee, Fa Chyi
author_facet Patt, Yehuda
Rojas‐Hernandez, Cristhiam
Fekrazad, Houman Mohammad
Bansal, Pranshu
Lee, Fa Chyi
author_sort Patt, Yehuda
collection PubMed
description LESSONS LEARNED. There continues to be a lack of systemic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); sorafenib and, very recently, regorafenib are the only approved options. There exists a potential to combine sorafenib with chemotherapeutic agents shown to be active in HCC, such as capecitabine, safely. Good tumor response was observed, with objective improvement in a few patients seldom seen by single agent sorafenib; however, because of the limited number of patients, meaningful conclusions on survival cannot be drawn. BACKGROUND. Sorafenib is the currently approved first‐line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Capecitabine has antitumor activity in hepatobiliary cancers. The combination of the two, if tolerated, could possibly improve antitumor response, and survival. METHODS. Patients with advanced HCC ineligible for locoregional therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2, Child‐Pugh class A or B‐7 cirrhosis, hemoglobin ≥8.5 g/dL, platelets ≥50,000/μL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,500 cells/μL, and serum creatinine of ≤2.0 mg/dL were recruited. All subjects received a combination of sorafenib and capecitabine, on a 14‐day 7‐days on 7‐days off schedule. The primary end point was safety and secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease control rate. RESULTS. A total of 15 out of 47 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 64 years (56–79) and 77% were male. With a median follow‐up of 12 months, median OS was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5–23.4). Disease control rate was 77% (complete response 8%, partial response 8%, and stable disease 61%). Common adverse events were as follows: (a) thrombocytopenia (64%); (b) anemia (14%); (c) hypophosphatemia (21%); (d) hypomagnesemia (14%); (e) hyperbilirubinemia (21%); (f) increased aspartate transaminase (AST) (14%); (g) hand‐foot syndrome (21%); and (h) deep vein thrombosis (21%). CONCLUSION. At tolerable doses, the combination of sorafenib and capecitabine seems an active and safe palliative treatment for HCC in class A and B‐7 patients with cirrhosis. The small sample size does not allow comparison with single‐agent sorafenib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5634773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AlphaMed Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56347732017-10-12 Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: INST 08‐20 Patt, Yehuda Rojas‐Hernandez, Cristhiam Fekrazad, Houman Mohammad Bansal, Pranshu Lee, Fa Chyi Oncologist Clinical Trial Results LESSONS LEARNED. There continues to be a lack of systemic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); sorafenib and, very recently, regorafenib are the only approved options. There exists a potential to combine sorafenib with chemotherapeutic agents shown to be active in HCC, such as capecitabine, safely. Good tumor response was observed, with objective improvement in a few patients seldom seen by single agent sorafenib; however, because of the limited number of patients, meaningful conclusions on survival cannot be drawn. BACKGROUND. Sorafenib is the currently approved first‐line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Capecitabine has antitumor activity in hepatobiliary cancers. The combination of the two, if tolerated, could possibly improve antitumor response, and survival. METHODS. Patients with advanced HCC ineligible for locoregional therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2, Child‐Pugh class A or B‐7 cirrhosis, hemoglobin ≥8.5 g/dL, platelets ≥50,000/μL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,500 cells/μL, and serum creatinine of ≤2.0 mg/dL were recruited. All subjects received a combination of sorafenib and capecitabine, on a 14‐day 7‐days on 7‐days off schedule. The primary end point was safety and secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease control rate. RESULTS. A total of 15 out of 47 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 64 years (56–79) and 77% were male. With a median follow‐up of 12 months, median OS was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5–23.4). Disease control rate was 77% (complete response 8%, partial response 8%, and stable disease 61%). Common adverse events were as follows: (a) thrombocytopenia (64%); (b) anemia (14%); (c) hypophosphatemia (21%); (d) hypomagnesemia (14%); (e) hyperbilirubinemia (21%); (f) increased aspartate transaminase (AST) (14%); (g) hand‐foot syndrome (21%); and (h) deep vein thrombosis (21%). CONCLUSION. At tolerable doses, the combination of sorafenib and capecitabine seems an active and safe palliative treatment for HCC in class A and B‐7 patients with cirrhosis. The small sample size does not allow comparison with single‐agent sorafenib. AlphaMed Press 2017-07-07 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5634773/ /pubmed/28687627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0168 Text en ©AlphaMedPress; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Results
Patt, Yehuda
Rojas‐Hernandez, Cristhiam
Fekrazad, Houman Mohammad
Bansal, Pranshu
Lee, Fa Chyi
Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: INST 08‐20
title Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: INST 08‐20
title_full Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: INST 08‐20
title_fullStr Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: INST 08‐20
title_full_unstemmed Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: INST 08‐20
title_short Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Capecitabine in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: INST 08‐20
title_sort phase ii trial of sorafenib in combination with capecitabine in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: inst 08‐20
topic Clinical Trial Results
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28687627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0168
work_keys_str_mv AT pattyehuda phaseiitrialofsorafenibincombinationwithcapecitabineinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomainst0820
AT rojashernandezcristhiam phaseiitrialofsorafenibincombinationwithcapecitabineinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomainst0820
AT fekrazadhoumanmohammad phaseiitrialofsorafenibincombinationwithcapecitabineinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomainst0820
AT bansalpranshu phaseiitrialofsorafenibincombinationwithcapecitabineinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomainst0820
AT leefachyi phaseiitrialofsorafenibincombinationwithcapecitabineinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomainst0820