Cargando…

Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common, compressive nerve-entrapment disorder with symptoms of numbness, paresthesia, and pain. Carpal tunnel release surgery is the only known long-term effective treatment. However, surgery is invasive and up to 30% of patients report recurrence or per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meems, Margreet, Spek, Viola, Kop, Willem J., Meems, Berend-Jan, Visser, Leo H., Pop, Victor J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2208-9
_version_ 1783270180713922560
author Meems, Margreet
Spek, Viola
Kop, Willem J.
Meems, Berend-Jan
Visser, Leo H.
Pop, Victor J. M.
author_facet Meems, Margreet
Spek, Viola
Kop, Willem J.
Meems, Berend-Jan
Visser, Leo H.
Pop, Victor J. M.
author_sort Meems, Margreet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common, compressive nerve-entrapment disorder with symptoms of numbness, paresthesia, and pain. Carpal tunnel release surgery is the only known long-term effective treatment. However, surgery is invasive and up to 30% of patients report recurrence or persistence of symptoms or suffer from post-surgical complications. A promising non-surgical treatment for CTS is mechanical wrist traction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following mechanical traction in patients with CTS compared to care as usual. METHODS: Adult patients (N = 181, mean age 58.1 (13.0) years, 67% women) with electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS were recruited from an outpatient neurology clinic in the Netherlands between October 2013 and April 2015. After baseline assessments, patients were randomized to either the intervention group (12 treatments with mechanical traction, twice a week for a period of 6 weeks) or “care as usual”. The main clinical outcome measure was surgery during 6 months’ follow-up. In addition, symptom severity was measured using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) at baseline, 3, and 6 months’ follow-up. Baseline characteristics and severity of CTS symptoms at follow-up were compared between the intervention and care-as-usual groups using a t test and χ (2) tests. Time to event (surgery) between the groups was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: The intervention group had fewer surgeries (28%) compared to the care-as-usual group (43%) during follow-up (χ(2) (1) = 4.40, p = .036). Analyses of the survival curves revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups over time (log-rank test χ (2) (1) = 6.94, p = .008). At 6 months’ follow-up, symptom severity and functional status scores had significantly decreased from baseline in both groups (p < .001) and the improvements did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical traction is associated with fewer surgical interventions compared to care as usual in CTS patients. Reductions in patient-reported symptoms at 6 months’ follow-up was similar in both groups. The long-term effects of mechanical traction require further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NL44692.008.13. Registered on 19 September 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5634882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56348822017-10-19 Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial Meems, Margreet Spek, Viola Kop, Willem J. Meems, Berend-Jan Visser, Leo H. Pop, Victor J. M. Trials Research BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common, compressive nerve-entrapment disorder with symptoms of numbness, paresthesia, and pain. Carpal tunnel release surgery is the only known long-term effective treatment. However, surgery is invasive and up to 30% of patients report recurrence or persistence of symptoms or suffer from post-surgical complications. A promising non-surgical treatment for CTS is mechanical wrist traction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following mechanical traction in patients with CTS compared to care as usual. METHODS: Adult patients (N = 181, mean age 58.1 (13.0) years, 67% women) with electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS were recruited from an outpatient neurology clinic in the Netherlands between October 2013 and April 2015. After baseline assessments, patients were randomized to either the intervention group (12 treatments with mechanical traction, twice a week for a period of 6 weeks) or “care as usual”. The main clinical outcome measure was surgery during 6 months’ follow-up. In addition, symptom severity was measured using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) at baseline, 3, and 6 months’ follow-up. Baseline characteristics and severity of CTS symptoms at follow-up were compared between the intervention and care-as-usual groups using a t test and χ (2) tests. Time to event (surgery) between the groups was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: The intervention group had fewer surgeries (28%) compared to the care-as-usual group (43%) during follow-up (χ(2) (1) = 4.40, p = .036). Analyses of the survival curves revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups over time (log-rank test χ (2) (1) = 6.94, p = .008). At 6 months’ follow-up, symptom severity and functional status scores had significantly decreased from baseline in both groups (p < .001) and the improvements did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical traction is associated with fewer surgical interventions compared to care as usual in CTS patients. Reductions in patient-reported symptoms at 6 months’ follow-up was similar in both groups. The long-term effects of mechanical traction require further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NL44692.008.13. Registered on 19 September 2013. BioMed Central 2017-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5634882/ /pubmed/29017511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2208-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Meems, Margreet
Spek, Viola
Kop, Willem J.
Meems, Berend-Jan
Visser, Leo H.
Pop, Victor J. M.
Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2208-9
work_keys_str_mv AT meemsmargreet mechanicalwristtractionasanoninvasivetreatmentforcarpaltunnelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT spekviola mechanicalwristtractionasanoninvasivetreatmentforcarpaltunnelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kopwillemj mechanicalwristtractionasanoninvasivetreatmentforcarpaltunnelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meemsberendjan mechanicalwristtractionasanoninvasivetreatmentforcarpaltunnelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT visserleoh mechanicalwristtractionasanoninvasivetreatmentforcarpaltunnelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT popvictorjm mechanicalwristtractionasanoninvasivetreatmentforcarpaltunnelsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial