Cargando…
Differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology
One of the roles of a forensic anthropologist is to assist medico-legal investigations in the identification of human skeletal remains. In some instances, only small fragments of bone may be present. In this study, a non-destructive novel technique is presented to distinguish between human and non-h...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1662-y |
_version_ | 1783270209523548160 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Vail Beckett, Sophie Márquez-Grant, Nicholas |
author_facet | Johnson, Vail Beckett, Sophie Márquez-Grant, Nicholas |
author_sort | Johnson, Vail |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the roles of a forensic anthropologist is to assist medico-legal investigations in the identification of human skeletal remains. In some instances, only small fragments of bone may be present. In this study, a non-destructive novel technique is presented to distinguish between human and non-human long bones. This technique is based on the macroscopic and computed tomography (CT) analysis of nutrient foramina. The nutrient foramen of long bone diaphyses transmits the nutrient artery which provides much of the oxygen and nutrients to the bone. The nutrient foramen and its canal were analysed in six femora and humeri of human, sheep (Ovies aries) and pig (Sus scrofa) species. The location, position and direction of the nutrient foramina were measured macroscopically. The length of the canal, angle of the canal, circumference and area of the entrance of the foramen were measured from CT images. Macroscopic analysis revealed the femora nutrient foramina are more proximal, whereas humeri foramina are more distal. The human bones and sheep humerus conform to the perceived directionality, but the pig bones and sheep femur do not. Amongst the parameters measured in the CT analysis, the angle of the canal had a discriminatory power. This study shows the potential of this technique to be used independently or complementary to other methods in distinguishing between human and non-human bone in forensic anthropology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5635070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56350702017-10-23 Differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology Johnson, Vail Beckett, Sophie Márquez-Grant, Nicholas Int J Legal Med Original Article One of the roles of a forensic anthropologist is to assist medico-legal investigations in the identification of human skeletal remains. In some instances, only small fragments of bone may be present. In this study, a non-destructive novel technique is presented to distinguish between human and non-human long bones. This technique is based on the macroscopic and computed tomography (CT) analysis of nutrient foramina. The nutrient foramen of long bone diaphyses transmits the nutrient artery which provides much of the oxygen and nutrients to the bone. The nutrient foramen and its canal were analysed in six femora and humeri of human, sheep (Ovies aries) and pig (Sus scrofa) species. The location, position and direction of the nutrient foramina were measured macroscopically. The length of the canal, angle of the canal, circumference and area of the entrance of the foramen were measured from CT images. Macroscopic analysis revealed the femora nutrient foramina are more proximal, whereas humeri foramina are more distal. The human bones and sheep humerus conform to the perceived directionality, but the pig bones and sheep femur do not. Amongst the parameters measured in the CT analysis, the angle of the canal had a discriminatory power. This study shows the potential of this technique to be used independently or complementary to other methods in distinguishing between human and non-human bone in forensic anthropology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-08-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5635070/ /pubmed/28828524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1662-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Johnson, Vail Beckett, Sophie Márquez-Grant, Nicholas Differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology |
title | Differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology |
title_full | Differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology |
title_fullStr | Differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology |
title_full_unstemmed | Differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology |
title_short | Differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology |
title_sort | differentiating human versus non-human bone by exploring the nutrient foramen: implications for forensic anthropology |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1662-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonvail differentiatinghumanversusnonhumanbonebyexploringthenutrientforamenimplicationsforforensicanthropology AT beckettsophie differentiatinghumanversusnonhumanbonebyexploringthenutrientforamenimplicationsforforensicanthropology AT marquezgrantnicholas differentiatinghumanversusnonhumanbonebyexploringthenutrientforamenimplicationsforforensicanthropology |