Cargando…

Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether subchondral bone structure from plain radiographs is different between subjects with and without articular cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions (BMLs). METHODS: Radiography-based bone structure was assessed from 80 subjects with different stages of knee osteoart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirvasniemi, Jukka, Thevenot, Jérôme, Guermazi, Ali, Podlipská, Jana, Roemer, Frank W., Nieminen, Miika T., Saarakkala, Simo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4826-8
_version_ 1783270212359946240
author Hirvasniemi, Jukka
Thevenot, Jérôme
Guermazi, Ali
Podlipská, Jana
Roemer, Frank W.
Nieminen, Miika T.
Saarakkala, Simo
author_facet Hirvasniemi, Jukka
Thevenot, Jérôme
Guermazi, Ali
Podlipská, Jana
Roemer, Frank W.
Nieminen, Miika T.
Saarakkala, Simo
author_sort Hirvasniemi, Jukka
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether subchondral bone structure from plain radiographs is different between subjects with and without articular cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions (BMLs). METHODS: Radiography-based bone structure was assessed from 80 subjects with different stages of knee osteoarthritis using entropy of Laplacian-based image (E(Lap)) and local binary patterns (E(LBP)), homogeneity index of local angles (HI(Angles,mean)), and horizontal (FD(Hor)) and vertical fractal dimensions (FD(Ver)). Medial tibial articular cartilage damage and BMLs were scored using the magnetic resonance imaging osteoarthritis knee score. Level of statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. RESULTS: Subjects with medial tibial cartilage damage had significantly higher FD(Ver) and E(LBP) as well as lower E(Lap) and HI(Angles,mean) in the medial tibial subchondral bone region than subjects without damage. FD(Hor), FD(Ver), and E(LBP) were significantly higher, whereas E(Lap) and HI(Angles,mean) were lower in the medial trabecular bone region. Subjects with medial tibial BMLs had significantly higher FD(Ver) and E(LBP) as well as lower E(Lap) and HI(Angles,mean) in medial tibial subchondral bone. FD(Hor), FD(Ver), and E(LBP) were higher, whereas E(Lap) and HI(Angles,mean) were lower in medial trabecular bone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of bone structural analysis from radiographs when examining subjects with osteoarthritis or at risk of having it. KEY POINTS: • Knee osteoarthritis causes changes in articular cartilage and subchondral bone • Magnetic resonance imaging is a comprehensive imaging modality for knee osteoarthritis • Radiography-based bone structure analysis can provide additional information of osteoarthritic subjects
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5635082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56350822017-10-23 Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study Hirvasniemi, Jukka Thevenot, Jérôme Guermazi, Ali Podlipská, Jana Roemer, Frank W. Nieminen, Miika T. Saarakkala, Simo Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether subchondral bone structure from plain radiographs is different between subjects with and without articular cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions (BMLs). METHODS: Radiography-based bone structure was assessed from 80 subjects with different stages of knee osteoarthritis using entropy of Laplacian-based image (E(Lap)) and local binary patterns (E(LBP)), homogeneity index of local angles (HI(Angles,mean)), and horizontal (FD(Hor)) and vertical fractal dimensions (FD(Ver)). Medial tibial articular cartilage damage and BMLs were scored using the magnetic resonance imaging osteoarthritis knee score. Level of statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. RESULTS: Subjects with medial tibial cartilage damage had significantly higher FD(Ver) and E(LBP) as well as lower E(Lap) and HI(Angles,mean) in the medial tibial subchondral bone region than subjects without damage. FD(Hor), FD(Ver), and E(LBP) were significantly higher, whereas E(Lap) and HI(Angles,mean) were lower in the medial trabecular bone region. Subjects with medial tibial BMLs had significantly higher FD(Ver) and E(LBP) as well as lower E(Lap) and HI(Angles,mean) in medial tibial subchondral bone. FD(Hor), FD(Ver), and E(LBP) were higher, whereas E(Lap) and HI(Angles,mean) were lower in medial trabecular bone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of bone structural analysis from radiographs when examining subjects with osteoarthritis or at risk of having it. KEY POINTS: • Knee osteoarthritis causes changes in articular cartilage and subchondral bone • Magnetic resonance imaging is a comprehensive imaging modality for knee osteoarthritis • Radiography-based bone structure analysis can provide additional information of osteoarthritic subjects Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-04-24 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5635082/ /pubmed/28439649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4826-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal
Hirvasniemi, Jukka
Thevenot, Jérôme
Guermazi, Ali
Podlipská, Jana
Roemer, Frank W.
Nieminen, Miika T.
Saarakkala, Simo
Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study
title Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study
title_full Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study
title_fullStr Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study
title_short Differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the Oulu Knee Osteoarthritis study
title_sort differences in tibial subchondral bone structure evaluated using plain radiographs between knees with and without cartilage damage or bone marrow lesions - the oulu knee osteoarthritis study
topic Musculoskeletal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4826-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hirvasniemijukka differencesintibialsubchondralbonestructureevaluatedusingplainradiographsbetweenkneeswithandwithoutcartilagedamageorbonemarrowlesionstheoulukneeosteoarthritisstudy
AT thevenotjerome differencesintibialsubchondralbonestructureevaluatedusingplainradiographsbetweenkneeswithandwithoutcartilagedamageorbonemarrowlesionstheoulukneeosteoarthritisstudy
AT guermaziali differencesintibialsubchondralbonestructureevaluatedusingplainradiographsbetweenkneeswithandwithoutcartilagedamageorbonemarrowlesionstheoulukneeosteoarthritisstudy
AT podlipskajana differencesintibialsubchondralbonestructureevaluatedusingplainradiographsbetweenkneeswithandwithoutcartilagedamageorbonemarrowlesionstheoulukneeosteoarthritisstudy
AT roemerfrankw differencesintibialsubchondralbonestructureevaluatedusingplainradiographsbetweenkneeswithandwithoutcartilagedamageorbonemarrowlesionstheoulukneeosteoarthritisstudy
AT nieminenmiikat differencesintibialsubchondralbonestructureevaluatedusingplainradiographsbetweenkneeswithandwithoutcartilagedamageorbonemarrowlesionstheoulukneeosteoarthritisstudy
AT saarakkalasimo differencesintibialsubchondralbonestructureevaluatedusingplainradiographsbetweenkneeswithandwithoutcartilagedamageorbonemarrowlesionstheoulukneeosteoarthritisstudy