Cargando…

The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors

In Europe, employers of all private and public enterprises have a legal obligation to protect their employers by all the different types of workplace hazards to the safety and health of workers. The most important methods developed for the work-related stress risk assessment are based on the Cox...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chirico, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Society for Occupational Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819083
_version_ 1783270228536328192
author Chirico, Francesco
author_facet Chirico, Francesco
author_sort Chirico, Francesco
collection PubMed
description In Europe, employers of all private and public enterprises have a legal obligation to protect their employers by all the different types of workplace hazards to the safety and health of workers. The most important methods developed for the work-related stress risk assessment are based on the Cox's research commissioned by European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) and are the Management Standard HSE for work-related stress in United Kingdom, the START method in Germany, the Screening, Observation, Analysis, Expertise (SOBANE) in Belgium, and the National Institute for Prevention and Safety at Work (INAIL-ISPESL) model in Italy, the latter based on the British Management Standard. Unfortunately, the definition of "work-related stress" elaborated by EU-OSHA was criticized, because it is not completely equal to the broader "psychosocial risk," which includes new and emerging psychosocial risk factors, such as the combined exposure to physical and psychosocial risks, job insecurity, work intensification and high demands at work, high emotional load related to burnout, work-life balance problems, and violence and harassment at work. All these new emerging psychosocial hazards could require different and additional methodologies to save workers' health and safety. For this reason, the concept that stakeholders and policy makers should keep in mind in order to develop better national regulations and strategies is that work-related stress risk and psychosocial risk factors are not the same.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5635152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Japan Society for Occupational Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56351522017-10-13 The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors Chirico, Francesco J Occup Health Opinion/Recommendation In Europe, employers of all private and public enterprises have a legal obligation to protect their employers by all the different types of workplace hazards to the safety and health of workers. The most important methods developed for the work-related stress risk assessment are based on the Cox's research commissioned by European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) and are the Management Standard HSE for work-related stress in United Kingdom, the START method in Germany, the Screening, Observation, Analysis, Expertise (SOBANE) in Belgium, and the National Institute for Prevention and Safety at Work (INAIL-ISPESL) model in Italy, the latter based on the British Management Standard. Unfortunately, the definition of "work-related stress" elaborated by EU-OSHA was criticized, because it is not completely equal to the broader "psychosocial risk," which includes new and emerging psychosocial risk factors, such as the combined exposure to physical and psychosocial risks, job insecurity, work intensification and high demands at work, high emotional load related to burnout, work-life balance problems, and violence and harassment at work. All these new emerging psychosocial hazards could require different and additional methodologies to save workers' health and safety. For this reason, the concept that stakeholders and policy makers should keep in mind in order to develop better national regulations and strategies is that work-related stress risk and psychosocial risk factors are not the same. Japan Society for Occupational Health 2017-08-17 2017-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5635152/ /pubmed/28819083 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Journal of Occupational Health is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Opinion/Recommendation
Chirico, Francesco
The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors
title The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors
title_full The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors
title_fullStr The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors
title_full_unstemmed The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors
title_short The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors
title_sort forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors
topic Opinion/Recommendation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819083
work_keys_str_mv AT chiricofrancesco theforgottenrealmofthenewandemergingpsychosocialriskfactors
AT chiricofrancesco forgottenrealmofthenewandemergingpsychosocialriskfactors