Cargando…

Are Evolution and the Intracellular Innate Immune System Key Determinants in HIV Transmission?

HIV-1 is the single most important sexually transmitted disease in humans from a global health perspective. Among human lentiviruses, HIV-1 M group has uniquely achieved pandemic levels of human-to-human transmission. The requirement to transmit between hosts likely provides the strongest selective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sumner, Rebecca P., Thorne, Lucy G., Fink, Doug L., Khan, Hataf, Milne, Richard S., Towers, Greg J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056936
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01246
_version_ 1783270263849222144
author Sumner, Rebecca P.
Thorne, Lucy G.
Fink, Doug L.
Khan, Hataf
Milne, Richard S.
Towers, Greg J.
author_facet Sumner, Rebecca P.
Thorne, Lucy G.
Fink, Doug L.
Khan, Hataf
Milne, Richard S.
Towers, Greg J.
author_sort Sumner, Rebecca P.
collection PubMed
description HIV-1 is the single most important sexually transmitted disease in humans from a global health perspective. Among human lentiviruses, HIV-1 M group has uniquely achieved pandemic levels of human-to-human transmission. The requirement to transmit between hosts likely provides the strongest selective forces on a virus, as without transmission, there can be no new infections within a host population. Our perspective is that evolution of all of the virus–host interactions, which are inherited and perpetuated from host-to-host, must be consistent with transmission. For example, CXCR4 use, which often evolves late in infection, does not favor transmission and is therefore lost when a virus transmits to a new host. Thus, transmission inevitably influences all aspects of virus biology, including interactions with the innate immune system, and dictates the biological niche in which the virus exists in the host. A viable viral niche typically does not select features that disfavor transmission. The innate immune response represents a significant selective pressure during the transmission process. In fact, all viruses must antagonize and/or evade the mechanisms of the host innate and adaptive immune systems that they encounter. We believe that viewing host–virus interactions from a transmission perspective helps us understand the mechanistic details of antiviral immunity and viral escape. This is particularly true for the innate immune system, which typically acts from the very earliest stages of the host–virus interaction, and must be bypassed to achieve successful infection. With this in mind, here we review the innate sensing of HIV, the consequent downstream signaling cascades and the viral restriction that results. The centrality of these mechanisms to host defense is illustrated by the array of countermeasures that HIV deploys to escape them, despite the coding constraint of a 10 kb genome. We consider evasion strategies in detail, in particular the role of the HIV capsid and the viral accessory proteins highlighting important unanswered questions and discussing future perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5635324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56353242017-10-20 Are Evolution and the Intracellular Innate Immune System Key Determinants in HIV Transmission? Sumner, Rebecca P. Thorne, Lucy G. Fink, Doug L. Khan, Hataf Milne, Richard S. Towers, Greg J. Front Immunol Immunology HIV-1 is the single most important sexually transmitted disease in humans from a global health perspective. Among human lentiviruses, HIV-1 M group has uniquely achieved pandemic levels of human-to-human transmission. The requirement to transmit between hosts likely provides the strongest selective forces on a virus, as without transmission, there can be no new infections within a host population. Our perspective is that evolution of all of the virus–host interactions, which are inherited and perpetuated from host-to-host, must be consistent with transmission. For example, CXCR4 use, which often evolves late in infection, does not favor transmission and is therefore lost when a virus transmits to a new host. Thus, transmission inevitably influences all aspects of virus biology, including interactions with the innate immune system, and dictates the biological niche in which the virus exists in the host. A viable viral niche typically does not select features that disfavor transmission. The innate immune response represents a significant selective pressure during the transmission process. In fact, all viruses must antagonize and/or evade the mechanisms of the host innate and adaptive immune systems that they encounter. We believe that viewing host–virus interactions from a transmission perspective helps us understand the mechanistic details of antiviral immunity and viral escape. This is particularly true for the innate immune system, which typically acts from the very earliest stages of the host–virus interaction, and must be bypassed to achieve successful infection. With this in mind, here we review the innate sensing of HIV, the consequent downstream signaling cascades and the viral restriction that results. The centrality of these mechanisms to host defense is illustrated by the array of countermeasures that HIV deploys to escape them, despite the coding constraint of a 10 kb genome. We consider evasion strategies in detail, in particular the role of the HIV capsid and the viral accessory proteins highlighting important unanswered questions and discussing future perspectives. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5635324/ /pubmed/29056936 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01246 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sumner, Thorne, Fink, Khan, Milne and Towers. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Sumner, Rebecca P.
Thorne, Lucy G.
Fink, Doug L.
Khan, Hataf
Milne, Richard S.
Towers, Greg J.
Are Evolution and the Intracellular Innate Immune System Key Determinants in HIV Transmission?
title Are Evolution and the Intracellular Innate Immune System Key Determinants in HIV Transmission?
title_full Are Evolution and the Intracellular Innate Immune System Key Determinants in HIV Transmission?
title_fullStr Are Evolution and the Intracellular Innate Immune System Key Determinants in HIV Transmission?
title_full_unstemmed Are Evolution and the Intracellular Innate Immune System Key Determinants in HIV Transmission?
title_short Are Evolution and the Intracellular Innate Immune System Key Determinants in HIV Transmission?
title_sort are evolution and the intracellular innate immune system key determinants in hiv transmission?
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056936
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01246
work_keys_str_mv AT sumnerrebeccap areevolutionandtheintracellularinnateimmunesystemkeydeterminantsinhivtransmission
AT thornelucyg areevolutionandtheintracellularinnateimmunesystemkeydeterminantsinhivtransmission
AT finkdougl areevolutionandtheintracellularinnateimmunesystemkeydeterminantsinhivtransmission
AT khanhataf areevolutionandtheintracellularinnateimmunesystemkeydeterminantsinhivtransmission
AT milnerichards areevolutionandtheintracellularinnateimmunesystemkeydeterminantsinhivtransmission
AT towersgregj areevolutionandtheintracellularinnateimmunesystemkeydeterminantsinhivtransmission