Cargando…

Assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets

BACKGROUND: Measuring the physical condition of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) under field conditions is of great importance for malaria control programmes to guide decisions on how frequently to replace LLINs. Current guidelines by the World Health Organization Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanden Eng, Jodi L., Mathanga, Don P., Landman, Keren, Mwandama, Dyson, Minta, Anna A., Shah, Monica, Sutcliffe, James, Chisaka, Joseph, Lindblade, Kim A., Steinhardt, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2049-8
_version_ 1783270300753854464
author Vanden Eng, Jodi L.
Mathanga, Don P.
Landman, Keren
Mwandama, Dyson
Minta, Anna A.
Shah, Monica
Sutcliffe, James
Chisaka, Joseph
Lindblade, Kim A.
Steinhardt, Laura
author_facet Vanden Eng, Jodi L.
Mathanga, Don P.
Landman, Keren
Mwandama, Dyson
Minta, Anna A.
Shah, Monica
Sutcliffe, James
Chisaka, Joseph
Lindblade, Kim A.
Steinhardt, Laura
author_sort Vanden Eng, Jodi L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Measuring the physical condition of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) under field conditions is of great importance for malaria control programmes to guide decisions on how frequently to replace LLINs. Current guidelines by the World Health Organization Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES) propose a proportionate hole index (pHI) for assessing LLIN condition by counting the number of holes the size of a thumb, fist, head, and larger than a head. However, this method does not account for irregular hole shapes or exact hole sizes which could result in inaccurate decisions about when to replace LLINs. METHODS: LLINs were collected during a 2013 health facility-based malaria case control study in Machinga District, Malawi. To evaluate the accuracy of the pHI, the physical condition of 277 LLINs was estimated by the WHOPES method and then compared with two more thorough measurement methods: image analysis of digital photographs of each LLIN side; and for 10 nets, ruler measurements of the length, width, and location of each hole. Total hole counts and areas per net were estimated by each method, and detailed results of hole shapes and composite pictures of hole locations were generated using image analysis. RESULTS: The WHOPES method and image analysis resulted in similar estimates of total hole counts, each with a median of 10 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 4–24 and 4–23, respectively; p = 0.004); however, estimated hole areas were significantly larger using the WHOPES method (median 162 cm(2), IQR 28–793) than image analysis (median 13 cm(2), IQR 3–101; p < 0.0001). The WHOPES method classified fewer LLINs in ‘good condition’ compared to image analysis (42% vs 74%). The ruler method detected significantly more holes than image analysis did (p = 0.002) in 10 LLINs; however, total hole area was not significantly different (p = 0.16). Most holes were not circular but roughly 2–5 times longer in one direction. The lower quarter of LLIN sides was found to have the most holes. CONCLUSIONS: The WHOPES method overestimated total hole area, likely because holes are elongated rather than circular, suggesting further adjustments to the pHI formula may be warranted when considering LLIN replacement strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-2049-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5635507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56355072017-10-18 Assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets Vanden Eng, Jodi L. Mathanga, Don P. Landman, Keren Mwandama, Dyson Minta, Anna A. Shah, Monica Sutcliffe, James Chisaka, Joseph Lindblade, Kim A. Steinhardt, Laura Malar J Methodology BACKGROUND: Measuring the physical condition of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) under field conditions is of great importance for malaria control programmes to guide decisions on how frequently to replace LLINs. Current guidelines by the World Health Organization Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES) propose a proportionate hole index (pHI) for assessing LLIN condition by counting the number of holes the size of a thumb, fist, head, and larger than a head. However, this method does not account for irregular hole shapes or exact hole sizes which could result in inaccurate decisions about when to replace LLINs. METHODS: LLINs were collected during a 2013 health facility-based malaria case control study in Machinga District, Malawi. To evaluate the accuracy of the pHI, the physical condition of 277 LLINs was estimated by the WHOPES method and then compared with two more thorough measurement methods: image analysis of digital photographs of each LLIN side; and for 10 nets, ruler measurements of the length, width, and location of each hole. Total hole counts and areas per net were estimated by each method, and detailed results of hole shapes and composite pictures of hole locations were generated using image analysis. RESULTS: The WHOPES method and image analysis resulted in similar estimates of total hole counts, each with a median of 10 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 4–24 and 4–23, respectively; p = 0.004); however, estimated hole areas were significantly larger using the WHOPES method (median 162 cm(2), IQR 28–793) than image analysis (median 13 cm(2), IQR 3–101; p < 0.0001). The WHOPES method classified fewer LLINs in ‘good condition’ compared to image analysis (42% vs 74%). The ruler method detected significantly more holes than image analysis did (p = 0.002) in 10 LLINs; however, total hole area was not significantly different (p = 0.16). Most holes were not circular but roughly 2–5 times longer in one direction. The lower quarter of LLIN sides was found to have the most holes. CONCLUSIONS: The WHOPES method overestimated total hole area, likely because holes are elongated rather than circular, suggesting further adjustments to the pHI formula may be warranted when considering LLIN replacement strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-2049-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5635507/ /pubmed/29017537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2049-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Vanden Eng, Jodi L.
Mathanga, Don P.
Landman, Keren
Mwandama, Dyson
Minta, Anna A.
Shah, Monica
Sutcliffe, James
Chisaka, Joseph
Lindblade, Kim A.
Steinhardt, Laura
Assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets
title Assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets
title_full Assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets
title_fullStr Assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets
title_full_unstemmed Assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets
title_short Assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets
title_sort assessing bed net damage: comparisons of three measurement methods for estimating the size, shape, and distribution of holes on bed nets
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2049-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenengjodil assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT mathangadonp assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT landmankeren assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT mwandamadyson assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT mintaannaa assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT shahmonica assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT sutcliffejames assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT chisakajoseph assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT lindbladekima assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets
AT steinhardtlaura assessingbednetdamagecomparisonsofthreemeasurementmethodsforestimatingthesizeshapeanddistributionofholesonbednets