Cargando…

Use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among Indian patients

INTRODUCTION: Although the use of a stopwatch is recommended to record intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) for premature ejaculation, there is no Indian literature which assesses the reliability of this method among our patients. Hence, we assessed the accuracy of stopwatch-measured IELT an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhat, Gajanan Shripad, Shastry, Anuradha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29021654
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_56_17
_version_ 1783270335495274496
author Bhat, Gajanan Shripad
Shastry, Anuradha
author_facet Bhat, Gajanan Shripad
Shastry, Anuradha
author_sort Bhat, Gajanan Shripad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although the use of a stopwatch is recommended to record intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) for premature ejaculation, there is no Indian literature which assesses the reliability of this method among our patients. Hence, we assessed the accuracy of stopwatch-measured IELT and compared it with other methods such as number of thrusts and self-assessed IELT in an Indian context. METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2015, couples with premature ejaculation (PE) confirmed with the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool were enrolled in this study. They were asked to report self-assessed IELT for the first 2 weeks, number of thrusts before ejaculation following vaginal penetration for the next 2 weeks, and stopwatch-clocked IELT for the last 2 weeks. At each 2-week interval, the couples answered erectile/ejaculatory performance anxiety index questionnaire (EPAI). The data were analyzed at the end of 6 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 42 couples with an average married life of 5.53 years were included in the study. Average stopwatch-clocked IELT was almost 1 min more than the self-reported IELT, which was statistically significant. The average number of thrusts reported was 6.31. Anxiety on the EPAI scale was maximum while using stopwatch to measure IELT. CONCLUSION: Use of stopwatch to clock the IELT does not appear to represent true IELT in Indian patients. Self-assessed IELT correlated more accurately with symptoms of PE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5635671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56356712017-10-11 Use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among Indian patients Bhat, Gajanan Shripad Shastry, Anuradha Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Although the use of a stopwatch is recommended to record intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) for premature ejaculation, there is no Indian literature which assesses the reliability of this method among our patients. Hence, we assessed the accuracy of stopwatch-measured IELT and compared it with other methods such as number of thrusts and self-assessed IELT in an Indian context. METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2015, couples with premature ejaculation (PE) confirmed with the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool were enrolled in this study. They were asked to report self-assessed IELT for the first 2 weeks, number of thrusts before ejaculation following vaginal penetration for the next 2 weeks, and stopwatch-clocked IELT for the last 2 weeks. At each 2-week interval, the couples answered erectile/ejaculatory performance anxiety index questionnaire (EPAI). The data were analyzed at the end of 6 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 42 couples with an average married life of 5.53 years were included in the study. Average stopwatch-clocked IELT was almost 1 min more than the self-reported IELT, which was statistically significant. The average number of thrusts reported was 6.31. Anxiety on the EPAI scale was maximum while using stopwatch to measure IELT. CONCLUSION: Use of stopwatch to clock the IELT does not appear to represent true IELT in Indian patients. Self-assessed IELT correlated more accurately with symptoms of PE. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5635671/ /pubmed/29021654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_56_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bhat, Gajanan Shripad
Shastry, Anuradha
Use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among Indian patients
title Use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among Indian patients
title_full Use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among Indian patients
title_fullStr Use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among Indian patients
title_full_unstemmed Use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among Indian patients
title_short Use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among Indian patients
title_sort use of a stopwatch to measure ejaculatory latency may not be accurate among indian patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29021654
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_56_17
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatgajananshripad useofastopwatchtomeasureejaculatorylatencymaynotbeaccurateamongindianpatients
AT shastryanuradha useofastopwatchtomeasureejaculatorylatencymaynotbeaccurateamongindianpatients