Cargando…

EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness

A set of images can be considered as meaningfully different for an observer if they can be distinguished phenomenally from one another. Each phenomenal difference must be supported by some neurophysiological differences. Differentiation analysis aims to quantify neurophysiological differentiation ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mensen, Armand, Marshall, William, Tononi, Giulio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01748
_version_ 1783270343270465536
author Mensen, Armand
Marshall, William
Tononi, Giulio
author_facet Mensen, Armand
Marshall, William
Tononi, Giulio
author_sort Mensen, Armand
collection PubMed
description A set of images can be considered as meaningfully different for an observer if they can be distinguished phenomenally from one another. Each phenomenal difference must be supported by some neurophysiological differences. Differentiation analysis aims to quantify neurophysiological differentiation evoked by a given set of stimuli to assess its meaningfulness to the individual observer. As a proof of concept using high-density EEG, we show increased neurophysiological differentiation for a set of natural, meaningfully different images in contrast to another set of artificially generated, meaninglessly different images in nine participants. Stimulus-evoked neurophysiological differentiation (over 257 channels, 800 ms) was systematically greater for meaningful vs. meaningless stimulus categories both at the group level and for individual subjects. Spatial breakdown showed a central-posterior peak of differentiation, consistent with the visual nature of the stimulus sets. Temporal breakdown revealed an early peak of differentiation around 110 ms, prominent in the central-posterior region; and a later, longer-lasting peak at 300–500 ms that was spatially more distributed. The early peak of differentiation was not accompanied by changes in mean ERP amplitude, whereas the later peak was associated with a higher amplitude ERP for meaningful images. An ERP component similar to visual-awareness-negativity occurred during the nadir of differentiation across all image types. Control stimulus sets and further analysis indicate that changes in neurophysiological differentiation between meaningful and meaningless stimulus sets could not be accounted for by spatial properties of the stimuli or by stimulus novelty and predictability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5635725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56357252017-10-20 EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness Mensen, Armand Marshall, William Tononi, Giulio Front Psychol Psychology A set of images can be considered as meaningfully different for an observer if they can be distinguished phenomenally from one another. Each phenomenal difference must be supported by some neurophysiological differences. Differentiation analysis aims to quantify neurophysiological differentiation evoked by a given set of stimuli to assess its meaningfulness to the individual observer. As a proof of concept using high-density EEG, we show increased neurophysiological differentiation for a set of natural, meaningfully different images in contrast to another set of artificially generated, meaninglessly different images in nine participants. Stimulus-evoked neurophysiological differentiation (over 257 channels, 800 ms) was systematically greater for meaningful vs. meaningless stimulus categories both at the group level and for individual subjects. Spatial breakdown showed a central-posterior peak of differentiation, consistent with the visual nature of the stimulus sets. Temporal breakdown revealed an early peak of differentiation around 110 ms, prominent in the central-posterior region; and a later, longer-lasting peak at 300–500 ms that was spatially more distributed. The early peak of differentiation was not accompanied by changes in mean ERP amplitude, whereas the later peak was associated with a higher amplitude ERP for meaningful images. An ERP component similar to visual-awareness-negativity occurred during the nadir of differentiation across all image types. Control stimulus sets and further analysis indicate that changes in neurophysiological differentiation between meaningful and meaningless stimulus sets could not be accounted for by spatial properties of the stimuli or by stimulus novelty and predictability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5635725/ /pubmed/29056921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01748 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mensen, Marshall and Tononi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mensen, Armand
Marshall, William
Tononi, Giulio
EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness
title EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness
title_full EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness
title_fullStr EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness
title_full_unstemmed EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness
title_short EEG Differentiation Analysis and Stimulus Set Meaningfulness
title_sort eeg differentiation analysis and stimulus set meaningfulness
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29056921
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01748
work_keys_str_mv AT mensenarmand eegdifferentiationanalysisandstimulussetmeaningfulness
AT marshallwilliam eegdifferentiationanalysisandstimulussetmeaningfulness
AT tononigiulio eegdifferentiationanalysisandstimulussetmeaningfulness