Cargando…

Whole-Body 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI Versus 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Study in 28 Patients

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of simultaneous whole-body (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI compared with (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for detection of distant metastatic disease in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: Patients with histolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berzaczy, Dominik, Giraudo, Chiara, Haug, Alexander R., Raderer, Markus, Senn, Daniela, Karanikas, Georgios, Weber, Michael, Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28682844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001753
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of simultaneous whole-body (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI compared with (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for detection of distant metastatic disease in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS: Patients with histologically proven, well-differentiated NET (G1 or G2) were included in this prospective, institutional review board–approved study. Patients underwent (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and subsequent (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI after a single tracer injection on the same day for staging or restaging purposes. Images were evaluated for the presence of NET lesions by 2 rater teams, each consisting of a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist, in an observer-blinded fashion. Overall agreement, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, relative to a composite reference standard (consensus review including follow-up data), were calculated. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and June 2016, 28 patients were enrolled. Overall agreement and accuracy between the 2 rater teams were 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.5%–95.9%) and 97% (95% CI, 94.4%–99.6%) for PET/MRI and 92.3% (95% CI, 88.3%–96.3%) and 94.6% (95% CI, 91.2%–98.1%) for PET/CT, respectively (P = 1.00). Overall, PET/MRI reached 89.8% sensitivity (95% CI, 77.8%–96.6%) and 100% specificity (95% CI, 97%–100%); PET/CT showed 81.6% sensitivity (95% CI, 68%–91.2%) and 100% specificity (95% CI, 97%–100%) for the detection of metastatic disease in NETs. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI appears to be comparable to (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for lesion detection in patients with well-differentiated NETs.