Cargando…

A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city?

INTRODUCTION: An alarmingly high proportion of the Australian adult population does not meet national physical activity guidelines (57%). This is concerning because physical inactivity is a risk factor for several chronic diseases. In recent years, an increasing emphasis has been placed on the poten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapata-Diomedi, Belen, Knibbs, Luke D., Ware, Robert S., Heesch, Kristiann C., Tainio, Marko, Woodcock, James, Veerman, J. Lennert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29020093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184799
_version_ 1783270382093991936
author Zapata-Diomedi, Belen
Knibbs, Luke D.
Ware, Robert S.
Heesch, Kristiann C.
Tainio, Marko
Woodcock, James
Veerman, J. Lennert
author_facet Zapata-Diomedi, Belen
Knibbs, Luke D.
Ware, Robert S.
Heesch, Kristiann C.
Tainio, Marko
Woodcock, James
Veerman, J. Lennert
author_sort Zapata-Diomedi, Belen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: An alarmingly high proportion of the Australian adult population does not meet national physical activity guidelines (57%). This is concerning because physical inactivity is a risk factor for several chronic diseases. In recent years, an increasing emphasis has been placed on the potential for transport and urban planning to contribute to increased physical activity via greater uptake of active transport (walking, cycling and public transport). In this study, we aimed to estimate the potential health gains and savings in health care costs of an Australian city achieving its stated travel targets for the use of active transport. METHODS: Additional active transport time was estimated for the hypothetical scenario of Brisbane (1.1 million population 2013) in Australia achieving specified travel targets. A multi-state life table model was used to estimate the number of health-adjusted life years, life-years, changes in the burden of diseases and injuries, and the health care costs associated with changes in physical activity, fine particle (<2.5 μm; PM(2.5)) exposure, and road trauma attributable to a shift from motorised travel to active transport. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test alternative modelling assumptions. RESULTS: Over the life course of the Brisbane adult population in 2013 (860,000 persons), 33,000 health-adjusted life years could be gained if the travel targets were achieved by 2026. This was mainly due to lower risks of physical inactivity-related diseases, with life course reductions in prevalence and mortality risk in the range of 1.5%-6.0%. Prevalence and mortality of respiratory diseases increased slightly (≥0.27%) due to increased exposure of larger numbers of cyclists and pedestrians to fine particles. The burden of road trauma increased by 30% for mortality and 7% for years lived with disability. We calculated substantial net savings ($AU183 million, 2013 values) in health care costs. CONCLUSION: In cities, such as Brisbane, where over 80% of trips are made by private cars, shifts towards walking, cycling and public transport would cause substantial net health benefits and savings in health care costs. However, for such shifts to occur, investments are needed to ensure safe and convenient travel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5636090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56360902017-10-30 A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city? Zapata-Diomedi, Belen Knibbs, Luke D. Ware, Robert S. Heesch, Kristiann C. Tainio, Marko Woodcock, James Veerman, J. Lennert PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: An alarmingly high proportion of the Australian adult population does not meet national physical activity guidelines (57%). This is concerning because physical inactivity is a risk factor for several chronic diseases. In recent years, an increasing emphasis has been placed on the potential for transport and urban planning to contribute to increased physical activity via greater uptake of active transport (walking, cycling and public transport). In this study, we aimed to estimate the potential health gains and savings in health care costs of an Australian city achieving its stated travel targets for the use of active transport. METHODS: Additional active transport time was estimated for the hypothetical scenario of Brisbane (1.1 million population 2013) in Australia achieving specified travel targets. A multi-state life table model was used to estimate the number of health-adjusted life years, life-years, changes in the burden of diseases and injuries, and the health care costs associated with changes in physical activity, fine particle (<2.5 μm; PM(2.5)) exposure, and road trauma attributable to a shift from motorised travel to active transport. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test alternative modelling assumptions. RESULTS: Over the life course of the Brisbane adult population in 2013 (860,000 persons), 33,000 health-adjusted life years could be gained if the travel targets were achieved by 2026. This was mainly due to lower risks of physical inactivity-related diseases, with life course reductions in prevalence and mortality risk in the range of 1.5%-6.0%. Prevalence and mortality of respiratory diseases increased slightly (≥0.27%) due to increased exposure of larger numbers of cyclists and pedestrians to fine particles. The burden of road trauma increased by 30% for mortality and 7% for years lived with disability. We calculated substantial net savings ($AU183 million, 2013 values) in health care costs. CONCLUSION: In cities, such as Brisbane, where over 80% of trips are made by private cars, shifts towards walking, cycling and public transport would cause substantial net health benefits and savings in health care costs. However, for such shifts to occur, investments are needed to ensure safe and convenient travel. Public Library of Science 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5636090/ /pubmed/29020093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184799 Text en © 2017 Zapata-Diomedi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zapata-Diomedi, Belen
Knibbs, Luke D.
Ware, Robert S.
Heesch, Kristiann C.
Tainio, Marko
Woodcock, James
Veerman, J. Lennert
A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city?
title A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city?
title_full A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city?
title_fullStr A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city?
title_full_unstemmed A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city?
title_short A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city?
title_sort shift from motorised travel to active transport: what are the potential health gains for an australian city?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29020093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184799
work_keys_str_mv AT zapatadiomedibelen ashiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT knibbsluked ashiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT wareroberts ashiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT heeschkristiannc ashiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT tainiomarko ashiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT woodcockjames ashiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT veermanjlennert ashiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT zapatadiomedibelen shiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT knibbsluked shiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT wareroberts shiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT heeschkristiannc shiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT tainiomarko shiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT woodcockjames shiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity
AT veermanjlennert shiftfrommotorisedtraveltoactivetransportwhatarethepotentialhealthgainsforanaustraliancity