Abstract: Does “Breast in a Day” Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction Compare Favorably to Traditional Two-Stage Technique?: Assessing Complications and Rates of Revision

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Emilie C., Kang, Vicky, Cesarz, Alison, Madrigrano, Andrea, Kopkash, Katherine A, Antony, Anuja K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
PSTM 2017 Abstract Supplement
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636317/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000526197.96239.4e
_version_ 1783270418408275968
author Robinson, Emilie C.
Kang, Vicky
Cesarz, Alison
Madrigrano, Andrea
Kopkash, Katherine A
Antony, Anuja K.
author_facet Robinson, Emilie C.
Kang, Vicky
Cesarz, Alison
Madrigrano, Andrea
Kopkash, Katherine A
Antony, Anuja K.
author_sort Robinson, Emilie C.
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5636317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56363172017-10-17 Abstract: Does “Breast in a Day” Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction Compare Favorably to Traditional Two-Stage Technique?: Assessing Complications and Rates of Revision Robinson, Emilie C. Kang, Vicky Cesarz, Alison Madrigrano, Andrea Kopkash, Katherine A Antony, Anuja K. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open PSTM 2017 Abstract Supplement Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5636317/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000526197.96239.4e Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle PSTM 2017 Abstract Supplement
Robinson, Emilie C.
Kang, Vicky
Cesarz, Alison
Madrigrano, Andrea
Kopkash, Katherine A
Antony, Anuja K.
Abstract: Does “Breast in a Day” Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction Compare Favorably to Traditional Two-Stage Technique?: Assessing Complications and Rates of Revision
title Abstract: Does “Breast in a Day” Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction Compare Favorably to Traditional Two-Stage Technique?: Assessing Complications and Rates of Revision
title_full Abstract: Does “Breast in a Day” Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction Compare Favorably to Traditional Two-Stage Technique?: Assessing Complications and Rates of Revision
title_fullStr Abstract: Does “Breast in a Day” Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction Compare Favorably to Traditional Two-Stage Technique?: Assessing Complications and Rates of Revision
title_full_unstemmed Abstract: Does “Breast in a Day” Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction Compare Favorably to Traditional Two-Stage Technique?: Assessing Complications and Rates of Revision
title_short Abstract: Does “Breast in a Day” Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction Compare Favorably to Traditional Two-Stage Technique?: Assessing Complications and Rates of Revision
title_sort abstract: does “breast in a day” direct to implant breast reconstruction compare favorably to traditional two-stage technique?: assessing complications and rates of revision
topic PSTM 2017 Abstract Supplement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636317/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000526197.96239.4e
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonemiliec abstractdoesbreastinadaydirecttoimplantbreastreconstructioncomparefavorablytotraditionaltwostagetechniqueassessingcomplicationsandratesofrevision
AT kangvicky abstractdoesbreastinadaydirecttoimplantbreastreconstructioncomparefavorablytotraditionaltwostagetechniqueassessingcomplicationsandratesofrevision
AT cesarzalison abstractdoesbreastinadaydirecttoimplantbreastreconstructioncomparefavorablytotraditionaltwostagetechniqueassessingcomplicationsandratesofrevision
AT madrigranoandrea abstractdoesbreastinadaydirecttoimplantbreastreconstructioncomparefavorablytotraditionaltwostagetechniqueassessingcomplicationsandratesofrevision
AT kopkashkatherinea abstractdoesbreastinadaydirecttoimplantbreastreconstructioncomparefavorablytotraditionaltwostagetechniqueassessingcomplicationsandratesofrevision
AT antonyanujak abstractdoesbreastinadaydirecttoimplantbreastreconstructioncomparefavorablytotraditionaltwostagetechniqueassessingcomplicationsandratesofrevision

Ejemplares similares