Cargando…

Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization as a Treatment Modality for Urinary Retention: Perceptions of Urologists

PURPOSE: Clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) is now considered the gold standard for the management of urinary retention. In the literature, several articles on patients’ perspectives on CISC and adherence to this technique have been published. No studies have yet explored the points of v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weynants, Laurens, Hervé, François, Decalf, Veerle, Kumps, Candy, Pieters, Ronny, de Troyer, Bart, Everaert, Karel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Continence Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28954460
http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1734824.412
_version_ 1783270546400608256
author Weynants, Laurens
Hervé, François
Decalf, Veerle
Kumps, Candy
Pieters, Ronny
de Troyer, Bart
Everaert, Karel
author_facet Weynants, Laurens
Hervé, François
Decalf, Veerle
Kumps, Candy
Pieters, Ronny
de Troyer, Bart
Everaert, Karel
author_sort Weynants, Laurens
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) is now considered the gold standard for the management of urinary retention. In the literature, several articles on patients’ perspectives on CISC and adherence to this technique have been published. No studies have yet explored the points of view of professional caregivers, such as nurses and doctors. The aim of this study was to explore the opinions of urologists about CISC and to evaluate the need for dedicated nurses specialized in CISC through a self-administered questionnaire. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed to explore the opinions of professional caregivers about self-catheterization and to evaluate the need to provide nurses with specialized education in CISC. Questionnaires were sent to 244 urologists through email. We received 101 completed questionnaires. The response rate was 41.4%. RESULTS: Hand function, the presence or absence of tremor, and visual acuity were rated as the most important determinants for proposing CISC to a patient. Twenty-five percent of the urologists reported that financial remuneration would give them a greater incentive to propose CISC. The lack of dedicated nurses was reported by half of the urologists as a factor preventing them from proposing CISC. A meaningful number of urologists thought that patients perceive CISC as invasive and unpleasant. Although most urologists would choose CISC as a treatment option for themselves, almost 1 urologist out of 5 would prefer a permanent catheter. CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire gave valuable insights into urologists’ perceptions of CISC, and could serve as the basis for a subsequent broader international study. Further research should also focus on the opinions of nurses and other caregivers involved in incontinence management. Apart from financial remuneration, it is also clear that ensuring sufficient expertise and time for high-quality CISC care is important. This could be a potential role for dedicated nurses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5636956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Continence Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56369562017-10-12 Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization as a Treatment Modality for Urinary Retention: Perceptions of Urologists Weynants, Laurens Hervé, François Decalf, Veerle Kumps, Candy Pieters, Ronny de Troyer, Bart Everaert, Karel Int Neurourol J Original Article PURPOSE: Clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) is now considered the gold standard for the management of urinary retention. In the literature, several articles on patients’ perspectives on CISC and adherence to this technique have been published. No studies have yet explored the points of view of professional caregivers, such as nurses and doctors. The aim of this study was to explore the opinions of urologists about CISC and to evaluate the need for dedicated nurses specialized in CISC through a self-administered questionnaire. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed to explore the opinions of professional caregivers about self-catheterization and to evaluate the need to provide nurses with specialized education in CISC. Questionnaires were sent to 244 urologists through email. We received 101 completed questionnaires. The response rate was 41.4%. RESULTS: Hand function, the presence or absence of tremor, and visual acuity were rated as the most important determinants for proposing CISC to a patient. Twenty-five percent of the urologists reported that financial remuneration would give them a greater incentive to propose CISC. The lack of dedicated nurses was reported by half of the urologists as a factor preventing them from proposing CISC. A meaningful number of urologists thought that patients perceive CISC as invasive and unpleasant. Although most urologists would choose CISC as a treatment option for themselves, almost 1 urologist out of 5 would prefer a permanent catheter. CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire gave valuable insights into urologists’ perceptions of CISC, and could serve as the basis for a subsequent broader international study. Further research should also focus on the opinions of nurses and other caregivers involved in incontinence management. Apart from financial remuneration, it is also clear that ensuring sufficient expertise and time for high-quality CISC care is important. This could be a potential role for dedicated nurses. Korean Continence Society 2017-09 2017-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5636956/ /pubmed/28954460 http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1734824.412 Text en Copyright © 2017 Korean Continence Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Weynants, Laurens
Hervé, François
Decalf, Veerle
Kumps, Candy
Pieters, Ronny
de Troyer, Bart
Everaert, Karel
Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization as a Treatment Modality for Urinary Retention: Perceptions of Urologists
title Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization as a Treatment Modality for Urinary Retention: Perceptions of Urologists
title_full Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization as a Treatment Modality for Urinary Retention: Perceptions of Urologists
title_fullStr Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization as a Treatment Modality for Urinary Retention: Perceptions of Urologists
title_full_unstemmed Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization as a Treatment Modality for Urinary Retention: Perceptions of Urologists
title_short Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization as a Treatment Modality for Urinary Retention: Perceptions of Urologists
title_sort clean intermittent self-catheterization as a treatment modality for urinary retention: perceptions of urologists
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5636956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28954460
http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1734824.412
work_keys_str_mv AT weynantslaurens cleanintermittentselfcatheterizationasatreatmentmodalityforurinaryretentionperceptionsofurologists
AT hervefrancois cleanintermittentselfcatheterizationasatreatmentmodalityforurinaryretentionperceptionsofurologists
AT decalfveerle cleanintermittentselfcatheterizationasatreatmentmodalityforurinaryretentionperceptionsofurologists
AT kumpscandy cleanintermittentselfcatheterizationasatreatmentmodalityforurinaryretentionperceptionsofurologists
AT pietersronny cleanintermittentselfcatheterizationasatreatmentmodalityforurinaryretentionperceptionsofurologists
AT detroyerbart cleanintermittentselfcatheterizationasatreatmentmodalityforurinaryretentionperceptionsofurologists
AT everaertkarel cleanintermittentselfcatheterizationasatreatmentmodalityforurinaryretentionperceptionsofurologists