Cargando…

A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms

BACKGROUND: According to targeted treatment (TT), the whole flock is dewormed based on knowledge of the risk, or parameters that quantify the mean level of infection, whereas according to targeted selective treatment (TST), only individual animals within the grazing group are treated, based on paras...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kupcinskas, Tomas, Stadaliene, Inga, Paulauskas, Algimantas, Trusevicius, Pavelas, Petkevicius, Saulius, Höglund, Johan, Sarkunas, Mindaugas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29020990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0336-6
_version_ 1783270608446947328
author Kupcinskas, Tomas
Stadaliene, Inga
Paulauskas, Algimantas
Trusevicius, Pavelas
Petkevicius, Saulius
Höglund, Johan
Sarkunas, Mindaugas
author_facet Kupcinskas, Tomas
Stadaliene, Inga
Paulauskas, Algimantas
Trusevicius, Pavelas
Petkevicius, Saulius
Höglund, Johan
Sarkunas, Mindaugas
author_sort Kupcinskas, Tomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: According to targeted treatment (TT), the whole flock is dewormed based on knowledge of the risk, or parameters that quantify the mean level of infection, whereas according to targeted selective treatment (TST), only individual animals within the grazing group are treated, based on parasitological, production and/or morbidity parameters. The aim of this study was to compare two different treatment protocols on sheep farms in Lithuania. The study was conducted from 15 April to 31 October 2014 on three sheep farms. On the TT (the whole flock) and T(S)T (with FECs ≥ 300, respectively) farms all adult animals were treated orally with fenbendazole irrespective of EPG counts before the grazing season. The second treatment was applied with injectable ivermectin on both farms. However, on the TT farm all sheep were also treated on 2nd August regardless of their EPG counts, while on the T(S)T farm only those animals with an EPG ≥ 300 were treated on 1 July using a threshold of ≥ 300 EPG. No treatments were administered on the control farm (n = 1) during the study. RESULTS: Spring treatment of ewes significantly reduced nematode faecal egg counts (FEC) both on the TT and T(S)T farms, with the benefit of lowering pasture contamination with infective L(3) stage larvae at the start of grazing season, while it remained significantly higher on the control farm. The positive effect of the spring treatment of ewes was reflected by increased body weight gains (BWG) in lambs in the first half of the grazing season. Following the second treatment, the weight gains in lambs on the T(S)T farm were higher compared to lambs on the TT farm, while BWG in the control lambs started to decrease. The difference was also substantiated by the body condition scores (BCS) and dag scores (DS) of lambs, which were highest on the T(S)T farm compared with those on the control and TT farms. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that both treatment strategies were useful in reducing clinical effects (BCS and DS) of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism and increasing the performance in lambs. Furthermore, on the T(S)T farm some of animals were left in refugia, helping to slow down the development of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5637350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56373502017-10-18 A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms Kupcinskas, Tomas Stadaliene, Inga Paulauskas, Algimantas Trusevicius, Pavelas Petkevicius, Saulius Höglund, Johan Sarkunas, Mindaugas Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: According to targeted treatment (TT), the whole flock is dewormed based on knowledge of the risk, or parameters that quantify the mean level of infection, whereas according to targeted selective treatment (TST), only individual animals within the grazing group are treated, based on parasitological, production and/or morbidity parameters. The aim of this study was to compare two different treatment protocols on sheep farms in Lithuania. The study was conducted from 15 April to 31 October 2014 on three sheep farms. On the TT (the whole flock) and T(S)T (with FECs ≥ 300, respectively) farms all adult animals were treated orally with fenbendazole irrespective of EPG counts before the grazing season. The second treatment was applied with injectable ivermectin on both farms. However, on the TT farm all sheep were also treated on 2nd August regardless of their EPG counts, while on the T(S)T farm only those animals with an EPG ≥ 300 were treated on 1 July using a threshold of ≥ 300 EPG. No treatments were administered on the control farm (n = 1) during the study. RESULTS: Spring treatment of ewes significantly reduced nematode faecal egg counts (FEC) both on the TT and T(S)T farms, with the benefit of lowering pasture contamination with infective L(3) stage larvae at the start of grazing season, while it remained significantly higher on the control farm. The positive effect of the spring treatment of ewes was reflected by increased body weight gains (BWG) in lambs in the first half of the grazing season. Following the second treatment, the weight gains in lambs on the T(S)T farm were higher compared to lambs on the TT farm, while BWG in the control lambs started to decrease. The difference was also substantiated by the body condition scores (BCS) and dag scores (DS) of lambs, which were highest on the T(S)T farm compared with those on the control and TT farms. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that both treatment strategies were useful in reducing clinical effects (BCS and DS) of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism and increasing the performance in lambs. Furthermore, on the T(S)T farm some of animals were left in refugia, helping to slow down the development of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in future. BioMed Central 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5637350/ /pubmed/29020990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0336-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kupcinskas, Tomas
Stadaliene, Inga
Paulauskas, Algimantas
Trusevicius, Pavelas
Petkevicius, Saulius
Höglund, Johan
Sarkunas, Mindaugas
A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms
title A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms
title_full A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms
title_fullStr A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms
title_short A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms
title_sort comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two lithuanian sheep farms
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29020990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0336-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kupcinskastomas acomparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT stadalieneinga acomparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT paulauskasalgimantas acomparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT truseviciuspavelas acomparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT petkeviciussaulius acomparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT hoglundjohan acomparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT sarkunasmindaugas acomparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT kupcinskastomas comparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT stadalieneinga comparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT paulauskasalgimantas comparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT truseviciuspavelas comparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT petkeviciussaulius comparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT hoglundjohan comparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms
AT sarkunasmindaugas comparisonoftwodifferentanthelmintictreatmentregimensagainstnaturalgastrointestinalnematodeinfectionsontwolithuaniansheepfarms