Cargando…
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Various randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis have compared i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (LMA-S™) in adult patients and found that both the devices provided equivalent oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). However, no randomized controlled trial has compared air...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033717 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_149_17 |
_version_ | 1783270616002985984 |
---|---|
author | Damodaran, Srinath Sethi, Sameer Malhotra, Surender Kumar Samra, Tanvir Maitra, Souvik Saini, Vikas |
author_facet | Damodaran, Srinath Sethi, Sameer Malhotra, Surender Kumar Samra, Tanvir Maitra, Souvik Saini, Vikas |
author_sort | Damodaran, Srinath |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVE: Various randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis have compared i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (LMA-S™) in adult patients and found that both the devices provided equivalent oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). However, no randomized controlled trial has compared air-Q™ with i-gel™ and LMA-S™ in adult patient. Hence, we designed this study to compare air-Q™ with LMA-S™ and i-gel™ in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II of both sexes, between 18 and 60 years, were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary care center. Randomization of patients was done in three equal groups according to the insertion of supraglottic airway device by a computer-generated random number sequence: group air-Q™ (n = 25), group i-gel™ (n = 25), and group LMA-S™ (n = 25). Primary outcome of this study was OLP. We also recorded time for successful placement of device, ease of device insertion, number of attempts to insert device, and ease of gastric tube insertion along with postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation OLP of air-Q™, i-gel™, and LMA-S™ was 26.13 ± 4.957 cm, 23.75 ± 5.439 cm, and 24.80 ± 4.78 cm H(2)O (P = 0.279). The first insertion success rate for air-Q™, i-gel™, and LMA-S™ was 80%, 76%, and 92%, respectively (P = 0.353). The insertion time of air-Q™, i-gel™, and LMA-S™ was 20.6 ± 4.4, 14.8 ± 5.4, and 15.2 ± 4.7 s, respectively (P = 0.000). Time taken for air-Q™ insertion was significantly higher than time taken for i-gel™ (mean difference 5.8 s, P < 0.0001) and LMA-S™ (mean difference 5.4 s, P = 0.0001) insertion. Postoperative complications were similar with all three devices. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that air-Q™, i-gel™, and LMA-S™ were equally efficacious in terms of routine airway management in adult patients with normal airway anatomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5637413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56374132017-10-13 Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial Damodaran, Srinath Sethi, Sameer Malhotra, Surender Kumar Samra, Tanvir Maitra, Souvik Saini, Vikas Saudi J Anaesth Original Article STUDY OBJECTIVE: Various randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis have compared i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ (LMA-S™) in adult patients and found that both the devices provided equivalent oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). However, no randomized controlled trial has compared air-Q™ with i-gel™ and LMA-S™ in adult patient. Hence, we designed this study to compare air-Q™ with LMA-S™ and i-gel™ in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II of both sexes, between 18 and 60 years, were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary care center. Randomization of patients was done in three equal groups according to the insertion of supraglottic airway device by a computer-generated random number sequence: group air-Q™ (n = 25), group i-gel™ (n = 25), and group LMA-S™ (n = 25). Primary outcome of this study was OLP. We also recorded time for successful placement of device, ease of device insertion, number of attempts to insert device, and ease of gastric tube insertion along with postoperative complications. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation OLP of air-Q™, i-gel™, and LMA-S™ was 26.13 ± 4.957 cm, 23.75 ± 5.439 cm, and 24.80 ± 4.78 cm H(2)O (P = 0.279). The first insertion success rate for air-Q™, i-gel™, and LMA-S™ was 80%, 76%, and 92%, respectively (P = 0.353). The insertion time of air-Q™, i-gel™, and LMA-S™ was 20.6 ± 4.4, 14.8 ± 5.4, and 15.2 ± 4.7 s, respectively (P = 0.000). Time taken for air-Q™ insertion was significantly higher than time taken for i-gel™ (mean difference 5.8 s, P < 0.0001) and LMA-S™ (mean difference 5.4 s, P = 0.0001) insertion. Postoperative complications were similar with all three devices. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that air-Q™, i-gel™, and LMA-S™ were equally efficacious in terms of routine airway management in adult patients with normal airway anatomy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5637413/ /pubmed/29033717 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_149_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Damodaran, Srinath Sethi, Sameer Malhotra, Surender Kumar Samra, Tanvir Maitra, Souvik Saini, Vikas Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033717 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_149_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damodaransrinath comparisonoforopharyngealleakpressureofairqigelandlaryngealmaskairwaysupremeinadultpatientsduringgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sethisameer comparisonoforopharyngealleakpressureofairqigelandlaryngealmaskairwaysupremeinadultpatientsduringgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT malhotrasurenderkumar comparisonoforopharyngealleakpressureofairqigelandlaryngealmaskairwaysupremeinadultpatientsduringgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT samratanvir comparisonoforopharyngealleakpressureofairqigelandlaryngealmaskairwaysupremeinadultpatientsduringgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maitrasouvik comparisonoforopharyngealleakpressureofairqigelandlaryngealmaskairwaysupremeinadultpatientsduringgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sainivikas comparisonoforopharyngealleakpressureofairqigelandlaryngealmaskairwaysupremeinadultpatientsduringgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial |