Cargando…

Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (MoHCW) adopted the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme as a tool for laboratory quality systems strengthening. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the financial costs of SLMTA implementation using two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shumba, Edwin, Nzombe, Phoebe, Mbinda, Absolom, Simbi, Raiva, Mangwanya, Douglas, Kilmarx, Peter H., Luman, Elizabeth T., Zimuto, Sibongile N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS OpenJournals 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043197
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v3i2.248
_version_ 1783270653956194304
author Shumba, Edwin
Nzombe, Phoebe
Mbinda, Absolom
Simbi, Raiva
Mangwanya, Douglas
Kilmarx, Peter H.
Luman, Elizabeth T.
Zimuto, Sibongile N.
author_facet Shumba, Edwin
Nzombe, Phoebe
Mbinda, Absolom
Simbi, Raiva
Mangwanya, Douglas
Kilmarx, Peter H.
Luman, Elizabeth T.
Zimuto, Sibongile N.
author_sort Shumba, Edwin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (MoHCW) adopted the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme as a tool for laboratory quality systems strengthening. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the financial costs of SLMTA implementation using two models (external facilitators; and internal local or MoHCW facilitators) from the perspective of the implementing partner and to estimate resources needed to scale up the programme nationally in all 10 provinces. METHODS: The average expenditure per laboratory was calculated based on accounting records; calculations included implementing partner expenses but excluded in-kind contributions and salaries of local facilitators and trainees. We also estimated theoretical financial costs, keeping all contextual variables constant across the two models. Resource needs for future national expansion were estimated based on a two-phase implementation plan, in which 12 laboratories in each of five provinces would implement SLMTA per phase; for the internal facilitator model, 20 facilitators would be trained at the beginning of each phase. RESULTS: The average expenditure to implement SLMTA in 11 laboratories using external facilitators was approximately US$5800 per laboratory; expenditure in 19 laboratories using internal facilitators was approximately $6000 per laboratory. The theoretical financial cost of implementing a 12-laboratory SLMTA cohort keeping all contextual variables constant would be approximately $58 000 using external facilitators; or $15 000 using internal facilitators, plus $86 000 to train 20 facilitators. The financial cost for subsequent SLMTA cohorts using the previously-trained internal facilitators would be approximately $15 000, yielding a break-even point of 2 cohorts, at $116 000 for either model. Estimated resources required for national implementation in 120 laboratories would therefore be $580 000 using external facilitators ($58 000 per province) and $322 000 using internal facilitators ($86 000 for facilitator training in each of two phases plus $15 000 for SLMTA implementation in each province). CONCLUSION: Investing in training of internal facilitators will result in substantial savings over the scale-up of the programme. Our study provides information to assist policy makers to develop strategic plans for investing in laboratory strengthening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5637799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AOSIS OpenJournals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56377992017-10-17 Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators Shumba, Edwin Nzombe, Phoebe Mbinda, Absolom Simbi, Raiva Mangwanya, Douglas Kilmarx, Peter H. Luman, Elizabeth T. Zimuto, Sibongile N. Afr J Lab Med Original Research BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (MoHCW) adopted the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme as a tool for laboratory quality systems strengthening. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the financial costs of SLMTA implementation using two models (external facilitators; and internal local or MoHCW facilitators) from the perspective of the implementing partner and to estimate resources needed to scale up the programme nationally in all 10 provinces. METHODS: The average expenditure per laboratory was calculated based on accounting records; calculations included implementing partner expenses but excluded in-kind contributions and salaries of local facilitators and trainees. We also estimated theoretical financial costs, keeping all contextual variables constant across the two models. Resource needs for future national expansion were estimated based on a two-phase implementation plan, in which 12 laboratories in each of five provinces would implement SLMTA per phase; for the internal facilitator model, 20 facilitators would be trained at the beginning of each phase. RESULTS: The average expenditure to implement SLMTA in 11 laboratories using external facilitators was approximately US$5800 per laboratory; expenditure in 19 laboratories using internal facilitators was approximately $6000 per laboratory. The theoretical financial cost of implementing a 12-laboratory SLMTA cohort keeping all contextual variables constant would be approximately $58 000 using external facilitators; or $15 000 using internal facilitators, plus $86 000 to train 20 facilitators. The financial cost for subsequent SLMTA cohorts using the previously-trained internal facilitators would be approximately $15 000, yielding a break-even point of 2 cohorts, at $116 000 for either model. Estimated resources required for national implementation in 120 laboratories would therefore be $580 000 using external facilitators ($58 000 per province) and $322 000 using internal facilitators ($86 000 for facilitator training in each of two phases plus $15 000 for SLMTA implementation in each province). CONCLUSION: Investing in training of internal facilitators will result in substantial savings over the scale-up of the programme. Our study provides information to assist policy makers to develop strategic plans for investing in laboratory strengthening. AOSIS OpenJournals 2014-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5637799/ /pubmed/29043197 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v3i2.248 Text en © 2014. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shumba, Edwin
Nzombe, Phoebe
Mbinda, Absolom
Simbi, Raiva
Mangwanya, Douglas
Kilmarx, Peter H.
Luman, Elizabeth T.
Zimuto, Sibongile N.
Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators
title Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators
title_full Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators
title_fullStr Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators
title_full_unstemmed Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators
title_short Weighing the costs: Implementing the SLMTA programme in Zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators
title_sort weighing the costs: implementing the slmta programme in zimbabwe using internal versus external facilitators
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043197
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v3i2.248
work_keys_str_mv AT shumbaedwin weighingthecostsimplementingtheslmtaprogrammeinzimbabweusinginternalversusexternalfacilitators
AT nzombephoebe weighingthecostsimplementingtheslmtaprogrammeinzimbabweusinginternalversusexternalfacilitators
AT mbindaabsolom weighingthecostsimplementingtheslmtaprogrammeinzimbabweusinginternalversusexternalfacilitators
AT simbiraiva weighingthecostsimplementingtheslmtaprogrammeinzimbabweusinginternalversusexternalfacilitators
AT mangwanyadouglas weighingthecostsimplementingtheslmtaprogrammeinzimbabweusinginternalversusexternalfacilitators
AT kilmarxpeterh weighingthecostsimplementingtheslmtaprogrammeinzimbabweusinginternalversusexternalfacilitators
AT lumanelizabetht weighingthecostsimplementingtheslmtaprogrammeinzimbabweusinginternalversusexternalfacilitators
AT zimutosibongilen weighingthecostsimplementingtheslmtaprogrammeinzimbabweusinginternalversusexternalfacilitators