Cargando…
Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
PURPOSE: To evaluate transrectal (TR) and transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 154 men underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy between July 2012 and October 2016. 79/154 patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2176471 |
_version_ | 1783270664218607616 |
---|---|
author | Tewes, Susanne Peters, Inga Tiemeyer, Ansgar Peperhove, Matti Hartung, Dagmar Pertschy, Stefanie Kuczyk, Markus A. Wacker, Frank Hueper, Katja |
author_facet | Tewes, Susanne Peters, Inga Tiemeyer, Ansgar Peperhove, Matti Hartung, Dagmar Pertschy, Stefanie Kuczyk, Markus A. Wacker, Frank Hueper, Katja |
author_sort | Tewes, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate transrectal (TR) and transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 154 men underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy between July 2012 and October 2016. 79/154 patients were biopsied with a TR approach and 75/154 with a TP approach. MRI was retrospectively analyzed according to PI-RADS version 2. PI-RADS scores were compared with histopathological results. Descriptive statistics, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated. Histopathological results of first, second, and third MRI targeted biopsy cores were compared to evaluate the impact of one verus multiple targeted cores. RESULTS: Detection rates of PCa were 39% for TR biopsy and 75% for TP biopsy. Sensitivity/specificity for tumor detection with PI-RADS ≥ 4 were 81/69% for TR biopsy and 86/84% for TP biopsy. In 31% for TR biopsy and 19% for TP biopsy, PCa was found in the second or third MRI targeted biopsy core only. CONCLUSION: MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy may be conducted with the TR as well as the TP approach with high accuracy, giving more flexibility for diagnosis and the option for focal treatment of PCa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5637860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56378602017-11-01 Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches Tewes, Susanne Peters, Inga Tiemeyer, Ansgar Peperhove, Matti Hartung, Dagmar Pertschy, Stefanie Kuczyk, Markus A. Wacker, Frank Hueper, Katja Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate transrectal (TR) and transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 154 men underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy between July 2012 and October 2016. 79/154 patients were biopsied with a TR approach and 75/154 with a TP approach. MRI was retrospectively analyzed according to PI-RADS version 2. PI-RADS scores were compared with histopathological results. Descriptive statistics, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated. Histopathological results of first, second, and third MRI targeted biopsy cores were compared to evaluate the impact of one verus multiple targeted cores. RESULTS: Detection rates of PCa were 39% for TR biopsy and 75% for TP biopsy. Sensitivity/specificity for tumor detection with PI-RADS ≥ 4 were 81/69% for TR biopsy and 86/84% for TP biopsy. In 31% for TR biopsy and 19% for TP biopsy, PCa was found in the second or third MRI targeted biopsy core only. CONCLUSION: MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy may be conducted with the TR as well as the TP approach with high accuracy, giving more flexibility for diagnosis and the option for focal treatment of PCa. Hindawi 2017 2017-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5637860/ /pubmed/29094042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2176471 Text en Copyright © 2017 Susanne Tewes et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tewes, Susanne Peters, Inga Tiemeyer, Ansgar Peperhove, Matti Hartung, Dagmar Pertschy, Stefanie Kuczyk, Markus A. Wacker, Frank Hueper, Katja Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches |
title | Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches |
title_full | Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches |
title_short | Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches |
title_sort | evaluation of mri/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy using transrectal and transperineal approaches |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2176471 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tewessusanne evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches AT petersinga evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches AT tiemeyeransgar evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches AT peperhovematti evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches AT hartungdagmar evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches AT pertschystefanie evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches AT kuczykmarkusa evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches AT wackerfrank evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches AT hueperkatja evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches |