Cargando…

Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches

PURPOSE: To evaluate transrectal (TR) and transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 154 men underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy between July 2012 and October 2016. 79/154 patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tewes, Susanne, Peters, Inga, Tiemeyer, Ansgar, Peperhove, Matti, Hartung, Dagmar, Pertschy, Stefanie, Kuczyk, Markus A., Wacker, Frank, Hueper, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2176471
_version_ 1783270664218607616
author Tewes, Susanne
Peters, Inga
Tiemeyer, Ansgar
Peperhove, Matti
Hartung, Dagmar
Pertschy, Stefanie
Kuczyk, Markus A.
Wacker, Frank
Hueper, Katja
author_facet Tewes, Susanne
Peters, Inga
Tiemeyer, Ansgar
Peperhove, Matti
Hartung, Dagmar
Pertschy, Stefanie
Kuczyk, Markus A.
Wacker, Frank
Hueper, Katja
author_sort Tewes, Susanne
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate transrectal (TR) and transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 154 men underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy between July 2012 and October 2016. 79/154 patients were biopsied with a TR approach and 75/154 with a TP approach. MRI was retrospectively analyzed according to PI-RADS version 2. PI-RADS scores were compared with histopathological results. Descriptive statistics, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated. Histopathological results of first, second, and third MRI targeted biopsy cores were compared to evaluate the impact of one verus multiple targeted cores. RESULTS: Detection rates of PCa were 39% for TR biopsy and 75% for TP biopsy. Sensitivity/specificity for tumor detection with PI-RADS ≥ 4 were 81/69% for TR biopsy and 86/84% for TP biopsy. In 31% for TR biopsy and 19% for TP biopsy, PCa was found in the second or third MRI targeted biopsy core only. CONCLUSION: MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy may be conducted with the TR as well as the TP approach with high accuracy, giving more flexibility for diagnosis and the option for focal treatment of PCa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5637860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56378602017-11-01 Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches Tewes, Susanne Peters, Inga Tiemeyer, Ansgar Peperhove, Matti Hartung, Dagmar Pertschy, Stefanie Kuczyk, Markus A. Wacker, Frank Hueper, Katja Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate transrectal (TR) and transperineal (TP) approaches for MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 154 men underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy between July 2012 and October 2016. 79/154 patients were biopsied with a TR approach and 75/154 with a TP approach. MRI was retrospectively analyzed according to PI-RADS version 2. PI-RADS scores were compared with histopathological results. Descriptive statistics, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated. Histopathological results of first, second, and third MRI targeted biopsy cores were compared to evaluate the impact of one verus multiple targeted cores. RESULTS: Detection rates of PCa were 39% for TR biopsy and 75% for TP biopsy. Sensitivity/specificity for tumor detection with PI-RADS ≥ 4 were 81/69% for TR biopsy and 86/84% for TP biopsy. In 31% for TR biopsy and 19% for TP biopsy, PCa was found in the second or third MRI targeted biopsy core only. CONCLUSION: MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy may be conducted with the TR as well as the TP approach with high accuracy, giving more flexibility for diagnosis and the option for focal treatment of PCa. Hindawi 2017 2017-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5637860/ /pubmed/29094042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2176471 Text en Copyright © 2017 Susanne Tewes et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tewes, Susanne
Peters, Inga
Tiemeyer, Ansgar
Peperhove, Matti
Hartung, Dagmar
Pertschy, Stefanie
Kuczyk, Markus A.
Wacker, Frank
Hueper, Katja
Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
title Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
title_full Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
title_fullStr Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
title_short Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
title_sort evaluation of mri/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy using transrectal and transperineal approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2176471
work_keys_str_mv AT tewessusanne evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches
AT petersinga evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches
AT tiemeyeransgar evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches
AT peperhovematti evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches
AT hartungdagmar evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches
AT pertschystefanie evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches
AT kuczykmarkusa evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches
AT wackerfrank evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches
AT hueperkatja evaluationofmriultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyusingtransrectalandtransperinealapproaches