Cargando…

Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disease for which a limited number of information sources for patients exist. The role of the Internet in the patient–physician relationship is increasing. More and more patients search for online health information, which should be of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: San Giorgi, Michel R.M., de Groot, Olivier S.D., Dikkers, Frederik G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.26521
_version_ 1783270689092927488
author San Giorgi, Michel R.M.
de Groot, Olivier S.D.
Dikkers, Frederik G.
author_facet San Giorgi, Michel R.M.
de Groot, Olivier S.D.
Dikkers, Frederik G.
author_sort San Giorgi, Michel R.M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disease for which a limited number of information sources for patients exist. The role of the Internet in the patient–physician relationship is increasing. More and more patients search for online health information, which should be of good quality and easy readable. The study aim was to investigate the quality and readability of English online health information about RRP. STUDY DESIGN: Quality and readability assessment of online information. METHODS: Relevant information was collected using three different search engines and seven different search terms. Quality was assessed with the DISCERN instrument. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and average grade level (AGL) were determined to measure readability of the English websites. RESULTS: Fifty‐one English websites were included. The mean DISCERN score of the websites is 28.1 ± 9.7 (poor quality); the mean FRES is 41.3 ± 14.9 (difficult to read); and the mean AGL is 12.6 ± 2.3. CONCLUSION: The quality and readability of English websites about RRP is alarmingly poor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 127:2293–2297, 2017
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5638064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56380642017-10-25 Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis San Giorgi, Michel R.M. de Groot, Olivier S.D. Dikkers, Frederik G. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Laryngology OBJECTIVE: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disease for which a limited number of information sources for patients exist. The role of the Internet in the patient–physician relationship is increasing. More and more patients search for online health information, which should be of good quality and easy readable. The study aim was to investigate the quality and readability of English online health information about RRP. STUDY DESIGN: Quality and readability assessment of online information. METHODS: Relevant information was collected using three different search engines and seven different search terms. Quality was assessed with the DISCERN instrument. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and average grade level (AGL) were determined to measure readability of the English websites. RESULTS: Fifty‐one English websites were included. The mean DISCERN score of the websites is 28.1 ± 9.7 (poor quality); the mean FRES is 41.3 ± 14.9 (difficult to read); and the mean AGL is 12.6 ± 2.3. CONCLUSION: The quality and readability of English websites about RRP is alarmingly poor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 127:2293–2297, 2017 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-24 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5638064/ /pubmed/28233911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.26521 Text en © 2017 The Authors The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, “The Triological Society” and American Laryngological Association (ALA) This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Laryngology
San Giorgi, Michel R.M.
de Groot, Olivier S.D.
Dikkers, Frederik G.
Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
title Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
title_full Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
title_fullStr Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
title_full_unstemmed Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
title_short Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
title_sort quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
topic Laryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.26521
work_keys_str_mv AT sangiorgimichelrm qualityandreadabilityassessmentofwebsitesrelatedtorecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosis
AT degrootoliviersd qualityandreadabilityassessmentofwebsitesrelatedtorecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosis
AT dikkersfrederikg qualityandreadabilityassessmentofwebsitesrelatedtorecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosis