Cargando…
Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
OBJECTIVE: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disease for which a limited number of information sources for patients exist. The role of the Internet in the patient–physician relationship is increasing. More and more patients search for online health information, which should be of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.26521 |
_version_ | 1783270689092927488 |
---|---|
author | San Giorgi, Michel R.M. de Groot, Olivier S.D. Dikkers, Frederik G. |
author_facet | San Giorgi, Michel R.M. de Groot, Olivier S.D. Dikkers, Frederik G. |
author_sort | San Giorgi, Michel R.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disease for which a limited number of information sources for patients exist. The role of the Internet in the patient–physician relationship is increasing. More and more patients search for online health information, which should be of good quality and easy readable. The study aim was to investigate the quality and readability of English online health information about RRP. STUDY DESIGN: Quality and readability assessment of online information. METHODS: Relevant information was collected using three different search engines and seven different search terms. Quality was assessed with the DISCERN instrument. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and average grade level (AGL) were determined to measure readability of the English websites. RESULTS: Fifty‐one English websites were included. The mean DISCERN score of the websites is 28.1 ± 9.7 (poor quality); the mean FRES is 41.3 ± 14.9 (difficult to read); and the mean AGL is 12.6 ± 2.3. CONCLUSION: The quality and readability of English websites about RRP is alarmingly poor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 127:2293–2297, 2017 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5638064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56380642017-10-25 Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis San Giorgi, Michel R.M. de Groot, Olivier S.D. Dikkers, Frederik G. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Laryngology OBJECTIVE: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disease for which a limited number of information sources for patients exist. The role of the Internet in the patient–physician relationship is increasing. More and more patients search for online health information, which should be of good quality and easy readable. The study aim was to investigate the quality and readability of English online health information about RRP. STUDY DESIGN: Quality and readability assessment of online information. METHODS: Relevant information was collected using three different search engines and seven different search terms. Quality was assessed with the DISCERN instrument. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and average grade level (AGL) were determined to measure readability of the English websites. RESULTS: Fifty‐one English websites were included. The mean DISCERN score of the websites is 28.1 ± 9.7 (poor quality); the mean FRES is 41.3 ± 14.9 (difficult to read); and the mean AGL is 12.6 ± 2.3. CONCLUSION: The quality and readability of English websites about RRP is alarmingly poor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 127:2293–2297, 2017 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-24 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5638064/ /pubmed/28233911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.26521 Text en © 2017 The Authors The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, “The Triological Society” and American Laryngological Association (ALA) This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Laryngology San Giorgi, Michel R.M. de Groot, Olivier S.D. Dikkers, Frederik G. Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis |
title | Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis |
title_full | Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis |
title_fullStr | Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis |
title_short | Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis |
title_sort | quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis |
topic | Laryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.26521 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sangiorgimichelrm qualityandreadabilityassessmentofwebsitesrelatedtorecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosis AT degrootoliviersd qualityandreadabilityassessmentofwebsitesrelatedtorecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosis AT dikkersfrederikg qualityandreadabilityassessmentofwebsitesrelatedtorecurrentrespiratorypapillomatosis |