Cargando…
Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is associated with increased periprocedural risks after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Patterns of anticoagulation management involving non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have not been characterized. HYPOTHE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28543401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22726 |
_version_ | 1783270696444493824 |
---|---|
author | Black‐Maier, Eric Kim, Sunghee Steinberg, Benjamin A. Fonarow, Gregg C. Freeman, James V. Kowey, Peter R. Ansell, Jack Gersh, Bernard J. Mahaffey, Kenneth W. Naccarelli, Gerald Hylek, Elaine M. Go, Alan S. Peterson, Eric D. Piccini, Jonathan P. |
author_facet | Black‐Maier, Eric Kim, Sunghee Steinberg, Benjamin A. Fonarow, Gregg C. Freeman, James V. Kowey, Peter R. Ansell, Jack Gersh, Bernard J. Mahaffey, Kenneth W. Naccarelli, Gerald Hylek, Elaine M. Go, Alan S. Peterson, Eric D. Piccini, Jonathan P. |
author_sort | Black‐Maier, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is associated with increased periprocedural risks after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Patterns of anticoagulation management involving non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have not been characterized. HYPOTHESIS: Anticoagulation strategies and outcomes differ by anticoagulant type in patients undergoing CIED implantation. METHODS: Using the nationwide Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, we assessed how atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing CIED implantation were cared for and their subsequent outcomes. Outcomes were compared by oral anticoagulant therapy (none, warfarin, or NOAC) as well as by anticoagulation interruption status. RESULTS: Among 9129 AF patients, 416 (5%) underwent CIED implantation during a median follow‐up of 30 months (interquartile range, 24–36). Of these, 60 (14%) had implantation on a NOAC. Relative to warfarin therapy, those on a NOAC were younger (70.5 years [range, 65–77.5 years] vs 77 years [range, 70–82 years]), had less valvular heart disease (15.0% vs 31.3%), higher creatinine clearance (67.3 [range, 59.7–99.0] vs 65.8 [range, 50.0–91.6]), were more likely to have persistent AF (26.7% vs 22.9%), and use concomitant aspirin (51.7% vs 35.2%). OAC therapy was commonly interrupted for CIED in 64% (n = 183 of 284) of warfarin patients and 65% (n = 39 of 60) of NOAC patients. Many interrupted patients received intravenous bridging anticoagulation: 33/183 (18%) interrupted warfarin and 4/39 (10%) interrupted NOAC patients. Thirty‐day periprocedure bleeding and stroke adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Management of anticoagulation among AF patients undergoing CIED implantation is highly variable, with OAC being interrupted in more than half of both warfarin‐ and NOAC‐treated patients. Bleeding and stroke events were infrequent in both warfarin and NOAC‐treated patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5638096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56380962017-10-25 Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation Black‐Maier, Eric Kim, Sunghee Steinberg, Benjamin A. Fonarow, Gregg C. Freeman, James V. Kowey, Peter R. Ansell, Jack Gersh, Bernard J. Mahaffey, Kenneth W. Naccarelli, Gerald Hylek, Elaine M. Go, Alan S. Peterson, Eric D. Piccini, Jonathan P. Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is associated with increased periprocedural risks after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Patterns of anticoagulation management involving non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have not been characterized. HYPOTHESIS: Anticoagulation strategies and outcomes differ by anticoagulant type in patients undergoing CIED implantation. METHODS: Using the nationwide Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, we assessed how atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing CIED implantation were cared for and their subsequent outcomes. Outcomes were compared by oral anticoagulant therapy (none, warfarin, or NOAC) as well as by anticoagulation interruption status. RESULTS: Among 9129 AF patients, 416 (5%) underwent CIED implantation during a median follow‐up of 30 months (interquartile range, 24–36). Of these, 60 (14%) had implantation on a NOAC. Relative to warfarin therapy, those on a NOAC were younger (70.5 years [range, 65–77.5 years] vs 77 years [range, 70–82 years]), had less valvular heart disease (15.0% vs 31.3%), higher creatinine clearance (67.3 [range, 59.7–99.0] vs 65.8 [range, 50.0–91.6]), were more likely to have persistent AF (26.7% vs 22.9%), and use concomitant aspirin (51.7% vs 35.2%). OAC therapy was commonly interrupted for CIED in 64% (n = 183 of 284) of warfarin patients and 65% (n = 39 of 60) of NOAC patients. Many interrupted patients received intravenous bridging anticoagulation: 33/183 (18%) interrupted warfarin and 4/39 (10%) interrupted NOAC patients. Thirty‐day periprocedure bleeding and stroke adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Management of anticoagulation among AF patients undergoing CIED implantation is highly variable, with OAC being interrupted in more than half of both warfarin‐ and NOAC‐treated patients. Bleeding and stroke events were infrequent in both warfarin and NOAC‐treated patients. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5638096/ /pubmed/28543401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22726 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Black‐Maier, Eric Kim, Sunghee Steinberg, Benjamin A. Fonarow, Gregg C. Freeman, James V. Kowey, Peter R. Ansell, Jack Gersh, Bernard J. Mahaffey, Kenneth W. Naccarelli, Gerald Hylek, Elaine M. Go, Alan S. Peterson, Eric D. Piccini, Jonathan P. Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation |
title | Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation |
title_full | Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation |
title_fullStr | Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation |
title_short | Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation |
title_sort | oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28543401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blackmaiereric oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT kimsunghee oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT steinbergbenjamina oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT fonarowgreggc oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT freemanjamesv oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT koweypeterr oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT anselljack oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT gershbernardj oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT mahaffeykennethw oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT naccarelligerald oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT hylekelainem oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT goalans oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT petersonericd oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT piccinijonathanp oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation AT oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation |