Cargando…

Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is associated with increased periprocedural risks after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Patterns of anticoagulation management involving non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have not been characterized. HYPOTHE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Black‐Maier, Eric, Kim, Sunghee, Steinberg, Benjamin A., Fonarow, Gregg C., Freeman, James V., Kowey, Peter R., Ansell, Jack, Gersh, Bernard J., Mahaffey, Kenneth W., Naccarelli, Gerald, Hylek, Elaine M., Go, Alan S., Peterson, Eric D., Piccini, Jonathan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28543401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22726
_version_ 1783270696444493824
author Black‐Maier, Eric
Kim, Sunghee
Steinberg, Benjamin A.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Freeman, James V.
Kowey, Peter R.
Ansell, Jack
Gersh, Bernard J.
Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
Naccarelli, Gerald
Hylek, Elaine M.
Go, Alan S.
Peterson, Eric D.
Piccini, Jonathan P.
author_facet Black‐Maier, Eric
Kim, Sunghee
Steinberg, Benjamin A.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Freeman, James V.
Kowey, Peter R.
Ansell, Jack
Gersh, Bernard J.
Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
Naccarelli, Gerald
Hylek, Elaine M.
Go, Alan S.
Peterson, Eric D.
Piccini, Jonathan P.
author_sort Black‐Maier, Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is associated with increased periprocedural risks after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Patterns of anticoagulation management involving non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have not been characterized. HYPOTHESIS: Anticoagulation strategies and outcomes differ by anticoagulant type in patients undergoing CIED implantation. METHODS: Using the nationwide Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, we assessed how atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing CIED implantation were cared for and their subsequent outcomes. Outcomes were compared by oral anticoagulant therapy (none, warfarin, or NOAC) as well as by anticoagulation interruption status. RESULTS: Among 9129 AF patients, 416 (5%) underwent CIED implantation during a median follow‐up of 30 months (interquartile range, 24–36). Of these, 60 (14%) had implantation on a NOAC. Relative to warfarin therapy, those on a NOAC were younger (70.5 years [range, 65–77.5 years] vs 77 years [range, 70–82 years]), had less valvular heart disease (15.0% vs 31.3%), higher creatinine clearance (67.3 [range, 59.7–99.0] vs 65.8 [range, 50.0–91.6]), were more likely to have persistent AF (26.7% vs 22.9%), and use concomitant aspirin (51.7% vs 35.2%). OAC therapy was commonly interrupted for CIED in 64% (n = 183 of 284) of warfarin patients and 65% (n = 39 of 60) of NOAC patients. Many interrupted patients received intravenous bridging anticoagulation: 33/183 (18%) interrupted warfarin and 4/39 (10%) interrupted NOAC patients. Thirty‐day periprocedure bleeding and stroke adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Management of anticoagulation among AF patients undergoing CIED implantation is highly variable, with OAC being interrupted in more than half of both warfarin‐ and NOAC‐treated patients. Bleeding and stroke events were infrequent in both warfarin and NOAC‐treated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5638096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56380962017-10-25 Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation Black‐Maier, Eric Kim, Sunghee Steinberg, Benjamin A. Fonarow, Gregg C. Freeman, James V. Kowey, Peter R. Ansell, Jack Gersh, Bernard J. Mahaffey, Kenneth W. Naccarelli, Gerald Hylek, Elaine M. Go, Alan S. Peterson, Eric D. Piccini, Jonathan P. Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is associated with increased periprocedural risks after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Patterns of anticoagulation management involving non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have not been characterized. HYPOTHESIS: Anticoagulation strategies and outcomes differ by anticoagulant type in patients undergoing CIED implantation. METHODS: Using the nationwide Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, we assessed how atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing CIED implantation were cared for and their subsequent outcomes. Outcomes were compared by oral anticoagulant therapy (none, warfarin, or NOAC) as well as by anticoagulation interruption status. RESULTS: Among 9129 AF patients, 416 (5%) underwent CIED implantation during a median follow‐up of 30 months (interquartile range, 24–36). Of these, 60 (14%) had implantation on a NOAC. Relative to warfarin therapy, those on a NOAC were younger (70.5 years [range, 65–77.5 years] vs 77 years [range, 70–82 years]), had less valvular heart disease (15.0% vs 31.3%), higher creatinine clearance (67.3 [range, 59.7–99.0] vs 65.8 [range, 50.0–91.6]), were more likely to have persistent AF (26.7% vs 22.9%), and use concomitant aspirin (51.7% vs 35.2%). OAC therapy was commonly interrupted for CIED in 64% (n = 183 of 284) of warfarin patients and 65% (n = 39 of 60) of NOAC patients. Many interrupted patients received intravenous bridging anticoagulation: 33/183 (18%) interrupted warfarin and 4/39 (10%) interrupted NOAC patients. Thirty‐day periprocedure bleeding and stroke adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Management of anticoagulation among AF patients undergoing CIED implantation is highly variable, with OAC being interrupted in more than half of both warfarin‐ and NOAC‐treated patients. Bleeding and stroke events were infrequent in both warfarin and NOAC‐treated patients. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5638096/ /pubmed/28543401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22726 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Black‐Maier, Eric
Kim, Sunghee
Steinberg, Benjamin A.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Freeman, James V.
Kowey, Peter R.
Ansell, Jack
Gersh, Bernard J.
Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
Naccarelli, Gerald
Hylek, Elaine M.
Go, Alan S.
Peterson, Eric D.
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
title Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
title_full Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
title_fullStr Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
title_full_unstemmed Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
title_short Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
title_sort oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28543401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.22726
work_keys_str_mv AT blackmaiereric oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT kimsunghee oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT steinbergbenjamina oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT fonarowgreggc oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT freemanjamesv oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT koweypeterr oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT anselljack oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT gershbernardj oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT mahaffeykennethw oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT naccarelligerald oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT hylekelainem oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT goalans oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT petersonericd oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT piccinijonathanp oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation
AT oralanticoagulationmanagementinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcardiacimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantation