Cargando…
Room at the top
Five years after eLife published its first papers, we reflect on our consultative approach to peer review, the challenges of reproducibility, and the need to reform how published research is assessed.
Autor principal: | Schekman, Randy |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29021081 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31697 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Progress and promise
por: Schekman, Randy
Publicado: (2019) -
Reforming research assessment
por: Schekman, Randy, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
How early-career researchers are shaping eLife
por: Patterson, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A new twist on peer review
por: Patterson, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Launching eLife, Part 2
por: Schekman, Randy, et al.
Publicado: (2012)