Cargando…
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study
This study compared the efficacy of DA-9601 (Dong-A ST Co., Seoul, Korea) and its new formulation, DA-5204 (Dong-A ST Co.), for treating erosive gastritis. This phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomly assigned 434 patients with endoscopically proven gastric m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28960033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1807 |
_version_ | 1783270815821725696 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Yoon Jin Lee, Dong Ho Choi, Myung-Gyu Lee, Sung Joon Kim, Sung Kook Song, Geun Am Rhee, Poong-Lyul Jung, Hwoon-Yong Kang, Dae-Hwan Lee, Yong Chan Lee, Si Hyung Choi, Suck Chei Shim, Ki-Nam Seol, Sang-Yong Moon, Jeong Seop Shin, Yong Woon Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Soo Teik Cho, Jin Woong Choi, Eun Kwang Lee, Oh Young Jang, Jin Seok |
author_facet | Choi, Yoon Jin Lee, Dong Ho Choi, Myung-Gyu Lee, Sung Joon Kim, Sung Kook Song, Geun Am Rhee, Poong-Lyul Jung, Hwoon-Yong Kang, Dae-Hwan Lee, Yong Chan Lee, Si Hyung Choi, Suck Chei Shim, Ki-Nam Seol, Sang-Yong Moon, Jeong Seop Shin, Yong Woon Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Soo Teik Cho, Jin Woong Choi, Eun Kwang Lee, Oh Young Jang, Jin Seok |
author_sort | Choi, Yoon Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared the efficacy of DA-9601 (Dong-A ST Co., Seoul, Korea) and its new formulation, DA-5204 (Dong-A ST Co.), for treating erosive gastritis. This phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomly assigned 434 patients with endoscopically proven gastric mucosal erosions into two groups: DA-9601 3 times daily or DA-5,204 twice daily for 2 weeks. The final analysis included 421 patients (DA-5204, 209; DA-9601, 212). The primary endpoint (rate of effective gastric erosion healing) and secondary endpoints (cure rate of endoscopic erosion and gastrointestinal [GI] symptom relief) were assessed using endoscopy after the treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs), including GI symptoms, were also compared. At week 2, gastric healing rates with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 42.1% (88/209) and 42.5% (90/212), respectively. The difference between the groups was −0.4% (95% confidence interval, −9.8% to 9.1%), which was above the non-inferiority margin of −14%. The cure rate of gastric erosion in both groups was 37.3%. The improvement rates of GI symptoms with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 40.4% and 40.8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in both secondary endpoints. AEs were reported in 18 (8.4%) patients in the DA-5204 group and 19 (8.8%) in the DA-9601 group. Rates of AE were not different between the two groups. No serious AE or adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurred. These results demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-5204 compared to DA-9601. DA-5204 is as effective as DA-9601 in the treatment of erosive gastritis. Registered randomized clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02282670) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5639061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56390612017-11-01 Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study Choi, Yoon Jin Lee, Dong Ho Choi, Myung-Gyu Lee, Sung Joon Kim, Sung Kook Song, Geun Am Rhee, Poong-Lyul Jung, Hwoon-Yong Kang, Dae-Hwan Lee, Yong Chan Lee, Si Hyung Choi, Suck Chei Shim, Ki-Nam Seol, Sang-Yong Moon, Jeong Seop Shin, Yong Woon Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Soo Teik Cho, Jin Woong Choi, Eun Kwang Lee, Oh Young Jang, Jin Seok J Korean Med Sci Original Article This study compared the efficacy of DA-9601 (Dong-A ST Co., Seoul, Korea) and its new formulation, DA-5204 (Dong-A ST Co.), for treating erosive gastritis. This phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomly assigned 434 patients with endoscopically proven gastric mucosal erosions into two groups: DA-9601 3 times daily or DA-5,204 twice daily for 2 weeks. The final analysis included 421 patients (DA-5204, 209; DA-9601, 212). The primary endpoint (rate of effective gastric erosion healing) and secondary endpoints (cure rate of endoscopic erosion and gastrointestinal [GI] symptom relief) were assessed using endoscopy after the treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs), including GI symptoms, were also compared. At week 2, gastric healing rates with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 42.1% (88/209) and 42.5% (90/212), respectively. The difference between the groups was −0.4% (95% confidence interval, −9.8% to 9.1%), which was above the non-inferiority margin of −14%. The cure rate of gastric erosion in both groups was 37.3%. The improvement rates of GI symptoms with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 40.4% and 40.8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in both secondary endpoints. AEs were reported in 18 (8.4%) patients in the DA-5204 group and 19 (8.8%) in the DA-9601 group. Rates of AE were not different between the two groups. No serious AE or adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurred. These results demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-5204 compared to DA-9601. DA-5204 is as effective as DA-9601 in the treatment of erosive gastritis. Registered randomized clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02282670) The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2017-11 2017-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5639061/ /pubmed/28960033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1807 Text en © 2017 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Choi, Yoon Jin Lee, Dong Ho Choi, Myung-Gyu Lee, Sung Joon Kim, Sung Kook Song, Geun Am Rhee, Poong-Lyul Jung, Hwoon-Yong Kang, Dae-Hwan Lee, Yong Chan Lee, Si Hyung Choi, Suck Chei Shim, Ki-Nam Seol, Sang-Yong Moon, Jeong Seop Shin, Yong Woon Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Soo Teik Cho, Jin Woong Choi, Eun Kwang Lee, Oh Young Jang, Jin Seok Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study |
title | Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study |
title_full | Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study |
title_short | Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DA-9601 versus Its New Formulation, DA-5204, in Patients with Gastritis: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study |
title_sort | evaluation of the efficacy and safety of da-9601 versus its new formulation, da-5204, in patients with gastritis: phase iii, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28960033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choiyoonjin evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT leedongho evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT choimyunggyu evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT leesungjoon evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT kimsungkook evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT songgeunam evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT rheepoonglyul evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT junghwoonyong evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT kangdaehwan evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT leeyongchan evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT leesihyung evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT choisuckchei evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT shimkinam evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT seolsangyong evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT moonjeongseop evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT shinyongwoon evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT kimhyunsoo evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT leesooteik evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT chojinwoong evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT choieunkwang evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT leeohyoung evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy AT jangjinseok evaluationoftheefficacyandsafetyofda9601versusitsnewformulationda5204inpatientswithgastritisphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindnoninferioritystudy |