Cargando…
Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?
It was aimed to investigate the correlation between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and retention index (RI), which represents the quantitative evaluation of the uptake of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) used in positron emission tomog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033675 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.215485 |
_version_ | 1783270882597142528 |
---|---|
author | Köroğlu, Reyhan Köksal, İsmail Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk Gezer, Fatma Kekilli, Ersoy Ünal, Bülent |
author_facet | Köroğlu, Reyhan Köksal, İsmail Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk Gezer, Fatma Kekilli, Ersoy Ünal, Bülent |
author_sort | Köroğlu, Reyhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | It was aimed to investigate the correlation between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and retention index (RI), which represents the quantitative evaluation of the uptake of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) used in positron emission tomography (PET) and clinicopathologic as well as biologic prognostic factors. Forty-one women with breast cancer who were histopathologically diagnosed were included in this study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was applied to all patients before PET/computed tomography (CT). After FDG injection, PET/CT screening was applied within the 1(st) h (PET-1) and in the 2(nd) h (PET-2). SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVmax RI, and SUVmean RI of every image were calculated qualitatively and semiquantitatively. The correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative PET parameters and biologic as well as clinicopathologic prognosis factors was evaluated. Statistically, significant positive correlation was found between lymph nodes (LNs), which were evaluated by clinical picture, clinical stage as well as histopathologically and quantitative PET parameters (SUVmax1, SUVmax2,, RImax, SUVmean1, SUVmean2, RImean) (P < 0.05). While statistically significant correlation with RImax was detected only by LN (histopathological), correlations with RImean were detected by clinical picture, clinical stage, metabolic stage, and LN (histopathological). Statistically, significant correlation was found between RImax and estrogen receptor in patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 34) (P < 0.05). We detected correlations between biologic and clinicopathologic prognostic factors and SUVmax as well as SUVmean values in breast carcinoma. SUVmean values may provide important knowledge when the correlation between prognostic factors and PET parameters is investigated even if they are not used routinely. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5639443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56394432017-10-13 Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value? Köroğlu, Reyhan Köksal, İsmail Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk Gezer, Fatma Kekilli, Ersoy Ünal, Bülent World J Nucl Med Original Article It was aimed to investigate the correlation between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and retention index (RI), which represents the quantitative evaluation of the uptake of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) used in positron emission tomography (PET) and clinicopathologic as well as biologic prognostic factors. Forty-one women with breast cancer who were histopathologically diagnosed were included in this study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was applied to all patients before PET/computed tomography (CT). After FDG injection, PET/CT screening was applied within the 1(st) h (PET-1) and in the 2(nd) h (PET-2). SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVmax RI, and SUVmean RI of every image were calculated qualitatively and semiquantitatively. The correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative PET parameters and biologic as well as clinicopathologic prognosis factors was evaluated. Statistically, significant positive correlation was found between lymph nodes (LNs), which were evaluated by clinical picture, clinical stage as well as histopathologically and quantitative PET parameters (SUVmax1, SUVmax2,, RImax, SUVmean1, SUVmean2, RImean) (P < 0.05). While statistically significant correlation with RImax was detected only by LN (histopathological), correlations with RImean were detected by clinical picture, clinical stage, metabolic stage, and LN (histopathological). Statistically, significant correlation was found between RImax and estrogen receptor in patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 34) (P < 0.05). We detected correlations between biologic and clinicopathologic prognostic factors and SUVmax as well as SUVmean values in breast carcinoma. SUVmean values may provide important knowledge when the correlation between prognostic factors and PET parameters is investigated even if they are not used routinely. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5639443/ /pubmed/29033675 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.215485 Text en Copyright: © 2017 World Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Köroğlu, Reyhan Köksal, İsmail Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk Gezer, Fatma Kekilli, Ersoy Ünal, Bülent Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value? |
title | Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value? |
title_full | Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value? |
title_fullStr | Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value? |
title_full_unstemmed | Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value? |
title_short | Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value? |
title_sort | considering the relationship between quantitative parameters and prognostic factors in breast cancer: can mean standardized uptake value be an alternative to maximum standardized uptake value? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033675 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.215485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koroglureyhan consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue AT koksalismail consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue AT simsekfikriselcuk consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue AT gezerfatma consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue AT kekilliersoy consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue AT unalbulent consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue |