Cargando…

Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?

It was aimed to investigate the correlation between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and retention index (RI), which represents the quantitative evaluation of the uptake of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) used in positron emission tomog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köroğlu, Reyhan, Köksal, İsmail, Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk, Gezer, Fatma, Kekilli, Ersoy, Ünal, Bülent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033675
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.215485
_version_ 1783270882597142528
author Köroğlu, Reyhan
Köksal, İsmail
Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk
Gezer, Fatma
Kekilli, Ersoy
Ünal, Bülent
author_facet Köroğlu, Reyhan
Köksal, İsmail
Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk
Gezer, Fatma
Kekilli, Ersoy
Ünal, Bülent
author_sort Köroğlu, Reyhan
collection PubMed
description It was aimed to investigate the correlation between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and retention index (RI), which represents the quantitative evaluation of the uptake of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) used in positron emission tomography (PET) and clinicopathologic as well as biologic prognostic factors. Forty-one women with breast cancer who were histopathologically diagnosed were included in this study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was applied to all patients before PET/computed tomography (CT). After FDG injection, PET/CT screening was applied within the 1(st) h (PET-1) and in the 2(nd) h (PET-2). SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVmax RI, and SUVmean RI of every image were calculated qualitatively and semiquantitatively. The correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative PET parameters and biologic as well as clinicopathologic prognosis factors was evaluated. Statistically, significant positive correlation was found between lymph nodes (LNs), which were evaluated by clinical picture, clinical stage as well as histopathologically and quantitative PET parameters (SUVmax1, SUVmax2,, RImax, SUVmean1, SUVmean2, RImean) (P < 0.05). While statistically significant correlation with RImax was detected only by LN (histopathological), correlations with RImean were detected by clinical picture, clinical stage, metabolic stage, and LN (histopathological). Statistically, significant correlation was found between RImax and estrogen receptor in patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 34) (P < 0.05). We detected correlations between biologic and clinicopathologic prognostic factors and SUVmax as well as SUVmean values in breast carcinoma. SUVmean values may provide important knowledge when the correlation between prognostic factors and PET parameters is investigated even if they are not used routinely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5639443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56394432017-10-13 Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value? Köroğlu, Reyhan Köksal, İsmail Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk Gezer, Fatma Kekilli, Ersoy Ünal, Bülent World J Nucl Med Original Article It was aimed to investigate the correlation between maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and retention index (RI), which represents the quantitative evaluation of the uptake of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) used in positron emission tomography (PET) and clinicopathologic as well as biologic prognostic factors. Forty-one women with breast cancer who were histopathologically diagnosed were included in this study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was applied to all patients before PET/computed tomography (CT). After FDG injection, PET/CT screening was applied within the 1(st) h (PET-1) and in the 2(nd) h (PET-2). SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVmax RI, and SUVmean RI of every image were calculated qualitatively and semiquantitatively. The correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative PET parameters and biologic as well as clinicopathologic prognosis factors was evaluated. Statistically, significant positive correlation was found between lymph nodes (LNs), which were evaluated by clinical picture, clinical stage as well as histopathologically and quantitative PET parameters (SUVmax1, SUVmax2,, RImax, SUVmean1, SUVmean2, RImean) (P < 0.05). While statistically significant correlation with RImax was detected only by LN (histopathological), correlations with RImean were detected by clinical picture, clinical stage, metabolic stage, and LN (histopathological). Statistically, significant correlation was found between RImax and estrogen receptor in patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 34) (P < 0.05). We detected correlations between biologic and clinicopathologic prognostic factors and SUVmax as well as SUVmean values in breast carcinoma. SUVmean values may provide important knowledge when the correlation between prognostic factors and PET parameters is investigated even if they are not used routinely. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5639443/ /pubmed/29033675 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.215485 Text en Copyright: © 2017 World Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Köroğlu, Reyhan
Köksal, İsmail
Şimşek, Fikri Selçuk
Gezer, Fatma
Kekilli, Ersoy
Ünal, Bülent
Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?
title Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?
title_full Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?
title_fullStr Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?
title_full_unstemmed Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?
title_short Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?
title_sort considering the relationship between quantitative parameters and prognostic factors in breast cancer: can mean standardized uptake value be an alternative to maximum standardized uptake value?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033675
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.215485
work_keys_str_mv AT koroglureyhan consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue
AT koksalismail consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue
AT simsekfikriselcuk consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue
AT gezerfatma consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue
AT kekilliersoy consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue
AT unalbulent consideringtherelationshipbetweenquantitativeparametersandprognosticfactorsinbreastcancercanmeanstandardizeduptakevaluebeanalternativetomaximumstandardizeduptakevalue