Cargando…
Increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit?
A growing body of evidence suggests that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors appear to be a powerful option to improve the cardiovascular (CV) prognosis in high CV-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. Despite a significant reduction in major adverse CV events with SGLT2 inhibitor treatm...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29025400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0611-x |
_version_ | 1783270889785131008 |
---|---|
author | Tanaka, Atsushi Node, Koichi |
author_facet | Tanaka, Atsushi Node, Koichi |
author_sort | Tanaka, Atsushi |
collection | PubMed |
description | A growing body of evidence suggests that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors appear to be a powerful option to improve the cardiovascular (CV) prognosis in high CV-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. Despite a significant reduction in major adverse CV events with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment, however, an unexpected increased risk of amputation was observed in the CANVAS program and the subsequent pharmacovigilance analysis. Although the underlying mechanisms are currently unknown, because amputation has a large negative impact on patient clinical course, clinicians want to know the exact reason for the increased amputation in the canagliflozin treatment. We herein discuss a need to elucidate the actual reasons with more appropriate statistical consideration, taking into account individual clinical course potentially involved in the diabetes-related amputation. Decreases in the hardendpoints by canagliflozin might result in an alternate increase in the other diabetes-related complications, including amputation. In addition, if amputation occurred after stopping canagliflozin, the incidence might be caused by worsened glycemic control and a decrease in hematocrit, accompanied by a subsequent worsening of diabetic foot disease. More detailed approach considering individual clinical course potentially involved in the amputation, would help to further unravel the cause for suspected risk of amputation with canagliflozin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5639481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56394812017-10-18 Increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit? Tanaka, Atsushi Node, Koichi Cardiovasc Diabetol Commentary A growing body of evidence suggests that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors appear to be a powerful option to improve the cardiovascular (CV) prognosis in high CV-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. Despite a significant reduction in major adverse CV events with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment, however, an unexpected increased risk of amputation was observed in the CANVAS program and the subsequent pharmacovigilance analysis. Although the underlying mechanisms are currently unknown, because amputation has a large negative impact on patient clinical course, clinicians want to know the exact reason for the increased amputation in the canagliflozin treatment. We herein discuss a need to elucidate the actual reasons with more appropriate statistical consideration, taking into account individual clinical course potentially involved in the diabetes-related amputation. Decreases in the hardendpoints by canagliflozin might result in an alternate increase in the other diabetes-related complications, including amputation. In addition, if amputation occurred after stopping canagliflozin, the incidence might be caused by worsened glycemic control and a decrease in hematocrit, accompanied by a subsequent worsening of diabetic foot disease. More detailed approach considering individual clinical course potentially involved in the amputation, would help to further unravel the cause for suspected risk of amputation with canagliflozin. BioMed Central 2017-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5639481/ /pubmed/29025400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0611-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Tanaka, Atsushi Node, Koichi Increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit? |
title | Increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit? |
title_full | Increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit? |
title_fullStr | Increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit? |
title_full_unstemmed | Increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit? |
title_short | Increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit? |
title_sort | increased amputation risk with canagliflozin treatment: behind the large cardiovascular benefit? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29025400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0611-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanakaatsushi increasedamputationriskwithcanagliflozintreatmentbehindthelargecardiovascularbenefit AT nodekoichi increasedamputationriskwithcanagliflozintreatmentbehindthelargecardiovascularbenefit |