Cargando…

Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Although midwives make clinical decisions that have an impact on the health and well-being of mothers and babies, little is known about how they make those decisions. Wide variation in intrapartum decisions to refer women to obstetrician-led care suggests that midwives’ decisions are bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daemers, Darie O. A., van Limbeek, Evelien B. M., Wijnen, Hennie A. A., Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J., de Vries, Raymond G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1511-5
_version_ 1783270908547301376
author Daemers, Darie O. A.
van Limbeek, Evelien B. M.
Wijnen, Hennie A. A.
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J.
de Vries, Raymond G.
author_facet Daemers, Darie O. A.
van Limbeek, Evelien B. M.
Wijnen, Hennie A. A.
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J.
de Vries, Raymond G.
author_sort Daemers, Darie O. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although midwives make clinical decisions that have an impact on the health and well-being of mothers and babies, little is known about how they make those decisions. Wide variation in intrapartum decisions to refer women to obstetrician-led care suggests that midwives’ decisions are based on more than the evidence based medicine (EBM) model – i.e. clinical evidence, midwife’s expertise, and woman’s values - alone. With this study we aimed to explore the factors that influence clinical decision-making of midwives who work independently. METHODS: We used a qualitative approach, conducting in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 11 Dutch primary care midwives. Data collection took place between May and September 2015. The interviews were semi-structured, using written vignettes to solicit midwives’ clinical decision-making processes (Think Aloud method). We performed thematic analysis on the transcripts. RESULTS: We identified five themes that influenced clinical decision-making: the pregnant woman as a whole person, sources of knowledge, the midwife as a whole person, the collaboration between maternity care professionals, and the organisation of care. Regarding the midwife, her decisions were shaped not only by her experience, intuition, and personal circumstances, but also by her attitudes about physiology, woman-centredness, shared decision-making, and collaboration with other professionals. The nature of the local collaboration between maternity care professionals and locally-developed protocols dominated midwives’ clinical decision-making. When midwives and obstetricians had different philosophies of care and different practice styles, their collaborative efforts were challenged. CONCLUSION: Midwives’ clinical decision-making is a more varied and complex process than the EBM framework suggests. If midwives are to succeed in their role as promoters and protectors of physiological pregnancy and birth, they need to understand how clinical decisions in a multidisciplinary context are actually made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5639579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56395792017-10-18 Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study Daemers, Darie O. A. van Limbeek, Evelien B. M. Wijnen, Hennie A. A. Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J. de Vries, Raymond G. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Although midwives make clinical decisions that have an impact on the health and well-being of mothers and babies, little is known about how they make those decisions. Wide variation in intrapartum decisions to refer women to obstetrician-led care suggests that midwives’ decisions are based on more than the evidence based medicine (EBM) model – i.e. clinical evidence, midwife’s expertise, and woman’s values - alone. With this study we aimed to explore the factors that influence clinical decision-making of midwives who work independently. METHODS: We used a qualitative approach, conducting in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 11 Dutch primary care midwives. Data collection took place between May and September 2015. The interviews were semi-structured, using written vignettes to solicit midwives’ clinical decision-making processes (Think Aloud method). We performed thematic analysis on the transcripts. RESULTS: We identified five themes that influenced clinical decision-making: the pregnant woman as a whole person, sources of knowledge, the midwife as a whole person, the collaboration between maternity care professionals, and the organisation of care. Regarding the midwife, her decisions were shaped not only by her experience, intuition, and personal circumstances, but also by her attitudes about physiology, woman-centredness, shared decision-making, and collaboration with other professionals. The nature of the local collaboration between maternity care professionals and locally-developed protocols dominated midwives’ clinical decision-making. When midwives and obstetricians had different philosophies of care and different practice styles, their collaborative efforts were challenged. CONCLUSION: Midwives’ clinical decision-making is a more varied and complex process than the EBM framework suggests. If midwives are to succeed in their role as promoters and protectors of physiological pregnancy and birth, they need to understand how clinical decisions in a multidisciplinary context are actually made. BioMed Central 2017-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5639579/ /pubmed/28985725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1511-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Daemers, Darie O. A.
van Limbeek, Evelien B. M.
Wijnen, Hennie A. A.
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J.
de Vries, Raymond G.
Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study
title Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study
title_full Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study
title_short Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study
title_sort factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1511-5
work_keys_str_mv AT daemersdarieoa factorsinfluencingtheclinicaldecisionmakingofmidwivesaqualitativestudy
AT vanlimbeekevelienbm factorsinfluencingtheclinicaldecisionmakingofmidwivesaqualitativestudy
AT wijnenhennieaa factorsinfluencingtheclinicaldecisionmakingofmidwivesaqualitativestudy
AT nieuwenhuijzemariannej factorsinfluencingtheclinicaldecisionmakingofmidwivesaqualitativestudy
AT devriesraymondg factorsinfluencingtheclinicaldecisionmakingofmidwivesaqualitativestudy