Cargando…

Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus

BACKGROUND: Keratoconus (KC) is usually a bilateral corneal ectatic disease. For significant asymmetric presentation (so called unilateral KC), the fellow eye has the mildest and earliest form of the disease, which is typically called forme fruste keratoconus. The aim of this study was to evaluate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Awad, Eman A., Abou Samra, Waleed A., Torky, Magda A., El-Kannishy, Amr M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0584-2
_version_ 1783270910976851968
author Awad, Eman A.
Abou Samra, Waleed A.
Torky, Magda A.
El-Kannishy, Amr M.
author_facet Awad, Eman A.
Abou Samra, Waleed A.
Torky, Magda A.
El-Kannishy, Amr M.
author_sort Awad, Eman A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Keratoconus (KC) is usually a bilateral corneal ectatic disease. For significant asymmetric presentation (so called unilateral KC), the fellow eye has the mildest and earliest form of the disease, which is typically called forme fruste keratoconus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of parameters derived from a Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam) as well as the changes in the quality of mesopic vision in the apparently normal fellow eye (forme fruste) to detect the earliest and most sensitive parameters. METHODS: Patients with clinical keratoconus in one eye and forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eye were compared to subjects with normal eyes. The patients were examined using a rotating Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam).The following parameters were evaluated: keratometry, minimum corneal thickness, pachymetry progression index (PPI), Ambrósio relational thickness (ART), posterior elevation, back difference elevation (BDE) and multimetric D index(D index). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC) to detect the sensitivity and specificity of each parameter. Mesopic vision evaluations were performed by contrast sensitivity and glare tests for each group. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients with clinical keratoconus in one eye and forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eye and 72normal subjects were evaluated. In the clinical keratoconus eyes, the mean K, back difference elevation (BDE), pachymetric progression index maximum(PPI max), and multimetric D were significantly higher compared to the normal subjects, whereas the corneal pachymetry and Ambrósio relational thickness maximum (ART max) were significantly lower. In the forme fruste eyes, the ROC analysis showed that the AUC values of the mean K, thinnest pachymetry, ARTmax, BDE, D index, and PPI max were 0.82, 0.61, 0.88, 0. 67, and 0.64, respectively. The contrast sensitivity and glare tests were significantly affected in the forme fruste cases. CONCLUSION: In forme fruste keratoconus eyes, the ART max is considered a highly sensitive objective parameter. Contrast sensitivity and glare is an important subjective test, which is affected in forme fruste patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5639589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56395892017-10-18 Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus Awad, Eman A. Abou Samra, Waleed A. Torky, Magda A. El-Kannishy, Amr M. BMC Ophthalmol Debate BACKGROUND: Keratoconus (KC) is usually a bilateral corneal ectatic disease. For significant asymmetric presentation (so called unilateral KC), the fellow eye has the mildest and earliest form of the disease, which is typically called forme fruste keratoconus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of parameters derived from a Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam) as well as the changes in the quality of mesopic vision in the apparently normal fellow eye (forme fruste) to detect the earliest and most sensitive parameters. METHODS: Patients with clinical keratoconus in one eye and forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eye were compared to subjects with normal eyes. The patients were examined using a rotating Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam).The following parameters were evaluated: keratometry, minimum corneal thickness, pachymetry progression index (PPI), Ambrósio relational thickness (ART), posterior elevation, back difference elevation (BDE) and multimetric D index(D index). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC) to detect the sensitivity and specificity of each parameter. Mesopic vision evaluations were performed by contrast sensitivity and glare tests for each group. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients with clinical keratoconus in one eye and forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eye and 72normal subjects were evaluated. In the clinical keratoconus eyes, the mean K, back difference elevation (BDE), pachymetric progression index maximum(PPI max), and multimetric D were significantly higher compared to the normal subjects, whereas the corneal pachymetry and Ambrósio relational thickness maximum (ART max) were significantly lower. In the forme fruste eyes, the ROC analysis showed that the AUC values of the mean K, thinnest pachymetry, ARTmax, BDE, D index, and PPI max were 0.82, 0.61, 0.88, 0. 67, and 0.64, respectively. The contrast sensitivity and glare tests were significantly affected in the forme fruste cases. CONCLUSION: In forme fruste keratoconus eyes, the ART max is considered a highly sensitive objective parameter. Contrast sensitivity and glare is an important subjective test, which is affected in forme fruste patients. BioMed Central 2017-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5639589/ /pubmed/28985735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0584-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Awad, Eman A.
Abou Samra, Waleed A.
Torky, Magda A.
El-Kannishy, Amr M.
Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus
title Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus
title_full Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus
title_fullStr Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus
title_short Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus
title_sort objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0584-2
work_keys_str_mv AT awademana objectiveandsubjectivediagnosticparametersinthefelloweyeofunilateralkeratoconus
AT abousamrawaleeda objectiveandsubjectivediagnosticparametersinthefelloweyeofunilateralkeratoconus
AT torkymagdaa objectiveandsubjectivediagnosticparametersinthefelloweyeofunilateralkeratoconus
AT elkannishyamrm objectiveandsubjectivediagnosticparametersinthefelloweyeofunilateralkeratoconus