Cargando…

How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: In a randomised controlled trial, we found that informing women about overdetection changed their breast screening decisions. We now present a mediation analysis exploring the psychological pathways through which study participants who received the intervention processed information abou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hersch, Jolyn, McGeechan, Kevin, Barratt, Alexandra, Jansen, Jesse, Irwig, Les, Jacklyn, Gemma, Houssami, Nehmat, Dhillon, Haryana, McCaffery, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28988168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016246
_version_ 1783270973026336768
author Hersch, Jolyn
McGeechan, Kevin
Barratt, Alexandra
Jansen, Jesse
Irwig, Les
Jacklyn, Gemma
Houssami, Nehmat
Dhillon, Haryana
McCaffery, Kirsten
author_facet Hersch, Jolyn
McGeechan, Kevin
Barratt, Alexandra
Jansen, Jesse
Irwig, Les
Jacklyn, Gemma
Houssami, Nehmat
Dhillon, Haryana
McCaffery, Kirsten
author_sort Hersch, Jolyn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In a randomised controlled trial, we found that informing women about overdetection changed their breast screening decisions. We now present a mediation analysis exploring the psychological pathways through which study participants who received the intervention processed information about overdetection and how this influenced their decision-making. We examined a series of potential mediators in the causal chain between exposure to overdetection information and women’s subsequently reported breast screening intentions. DESIGN: Serial multiple mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 811 women aged 48–50 years with no personal history of breast cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Two versions of a decision aid giving women information about breast cancer deaths averted and false positives from mammography screening, either with (intervention) or without (control) information on overdetection. MAIN OUTCOME: Intentions to undergo breast cancer screening in the next 2–3 years. MEDIATORS: Knowledge about overdetection, worry about breast cancer, attitudes towards breast screening and anticipated regret. RESULTS: The effect of information about overdetection on women’s breast screening intentions was mediated through multiple cognitive and affective processes. In particular, the information led to substantial improvements in women’s understanding of overdetection, and it influenced—both directly and indirectly via its effect on knowledge—their attitudes towards having screening. Mediation analysis showed that the mechanisms involving knowledge and attitudes were particularly important in determining women’s intentions about screening participation. CONCLUSIONS: Even in this emotive context, new information influenced women’s decision-making by changing their understanding of possible consequences of screening and their attitudes towards undergoing it. These findings emphasise the need to provide good-quality information on screening outcomes and to communicate this information effectively, so that women can make well-informed decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613001035718) on 17 September 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5640026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56400262017-10-19 How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial Hersch, Jolyn McGeechan, Kevin Barratt, Alexandra Jansen, Jesse Irwig, Les Jacklyn, Gemma Houssami, Nehmat Dhillon, Haryana McCaffery, Kirsten BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVES: In a randomised controlled trial, we found that informing women about overdetection changed their breast screening decisions. We now present a mediation analysis exploring the psychological pathways through which study participants who received the intervention processed information about overdetection and how this influenced their decision-making. We examined a series of potential mediators in the causal chain between exposure to overdetection information and women’s subsequently reported breast screening intentions. DESIGN: Serial multiple mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 811 women aged 48–50 years with no personal history of breast cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Two versions of a decision aid giving women information about breast cancer deaths averted and false positives from mammography screening, either with (intervention) or without (control) information on overdetection. MAIN OUTCOME: Intentions to undergo breast cancer screening in the next 2–3 years. MEDIATORS: Knowledge about overdetection, worry about breast cancer, attitudes towards breast screening and anticipated regret. RESULTS: The effect of information about overdetection on women’s breast screening intentions was mediated through multiple cognitive and affective processes. In particular, the information led to substantial improvements in women’s understanding of overdetection, and it influenced—both directly and indirectly via its effect on knowledge—their attitudes towards having screening. Mediation analysis showed that the mechanisms involving knowledge and attitudes were particularly important in determining women’s intentions about screening participation. CONCLUSIONS: Even in this emotive context, new information influenced women’s decision-making by changing their understanding of possible consequences of screening and their attitudes towards undergoing it. These findings emphasise the need to provide good-quality information on screening outcomes and to communicate this information effectively, so that women can make well-informed decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613001035718) on 17 September 2013. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5640026/ /pubmed/28988168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016246 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Communication
Hersch, Jolyn
McGeechan, Kevin
Barratt, Alexandra
Jansen, Jesse
Irwig, Les
Jacklyn, Gemma
Houssami, Nehmat
Dhillon, Haryana
McCaffery, Kirsten
How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial
title How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial
title_full How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial
title_short How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial
title_sort how information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28988168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016246
work_keys_str_mv AT herschjolyn howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgeechankevin howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT barrattalexandra howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jansenjesse howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT irwigles howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jacklyngemma howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT houssaminehmat howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dhillonharyana howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccafferykirsten howinformationaboutoverdetectionchangesbreastcancerscreeningdecisionsamediationanalysiswithinarandomisedcontrolledtrial