Cargando…
Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design
BACKGROUND: Adverse events (AEs) epidemiology is the first step to improve practice in the healthcare system. Usually, the preferred method used to estimate the magnitude of the problem is the retrospective cohort study design, with retrospective reviews of the medical records. However this data col...
Autores principales: | Aranaz Andrés, Jesus Maria, Limón Ramírez, Ramon, Aibar Remón, Carlos, Gea-Velázquez de Castro, Maria Teresa, Bolúmar, Francisco, Hernández-Aguado, Ildefonso, López Fresneña, Nieves, Díaz-Agero Pérez, Cristina, Terol García, Enrique, Michel, Philippe, Sousa, Paulo, Larizgoitia Jauregui, Itziar |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016546 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Higher incidence of adverse events in isolated patients compared with non-isolated patients: a cohort study
por: Jiménez-Pericás, Fátima, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
WHO Efforts to Promote Reporting of Adverse Events and Global Learning
por: Larizgoitia, Itziar, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Adverse events: an expensive and avoidable hospital problem
por: San Jose-Saras, Diego, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Risk Analysis for Patient Safety in Surgical Departments: Cross-Sectional Design Usefulness
por: Aranaz Ostáriz, Verónica, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
SOBRINA Spanish study—analysing the frequency, cost and adverse events associated with overuse in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cohort study
por: Mira, José Joaquín, et al.
Publicado: (2019)