Cargando…

The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a new questionnaire for measuring patient experiences with general practitioners (PEQ-GP) following a national survey. SETTING: Postal survey among patients on any of 500 GPs patient lists in Norway. GPs were stratified by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmboe, Olaf, Iversen, Hilde Hestad, Danielsen, Kirsten, Bjertnaes, Oyvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016644
_version_ 1783270991578791936
author Holmboe, Olaf
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Danielsen, Kirsten
Bjertnaes, Oyvind
author_facet Holmboe, Olaf
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Danielsen, Kirsten
Bjertnaes, Oyvind
author_sort Holmboe, Olaf
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a new questionnaire for measuring patient experiences with general practitioners (PEQ-GP) following a national survey. SETTING: Postal survey among patients on any of 500 GPs patient lists in Norway. GPs were stratified by practice size and geographical criteria. PARTICIPANTS: 4964 patients who had at least one consultation with their regular GP in the foregoing 12 months were included in the study. The patients were randomly selected after the selection of GPs. 2377 patients (49%) responded to the survey. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The items were assessed for missing data and ceiling effects. Factor structure was assessed using exploratory factor analyses. Reliability was tested with item–total correlation, Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest correlations. Item discriminant validity was tested by correlating items with all scales. Construct validity was assessed through associations of scale scores with health status, the patients’ general satisfaction with the services, whether the patient had been incorrectly treated by the GP and whether the patient would recommend the GP to others. RESULTS: Item missing varied from 1.0% to 3.1%, while ceiling effects varied from 16.1% to 45.9%. The factor analyses identified three factors. Reliability statistics for scales based on these three factors, and two theoretically derived scales, showed item–total correlations ranging from 0.63 to 0.85 and Cronbach’s alpha values from 0.77 to 0.93. Test–retest correlation for the five scales varied from 0.72 to 0.88. All scales had the expected association with other variables. CONCLUSIONS: The PEQ-GP has good evidence for data quality, internal consistency and construct validity. The PEQ-GP is recommended for use in local, regional and national surveys in Norway, but further studies are needed to assess the instrument’s ability to detect differences over time and between different GPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5640105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56401052017-10-19 The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey Holmboe, Olaf Iversen, Hilde Hestad Danielsen, Kirsten Bjertnaes, Oyvind BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a new questionnaire for measuring patient experiences with general practitioners (PEQ-GP) following a national survey. SETTING: Postal survey among patients on any of 500 GPs patient lists in Norway. GPs were stratified by practice size and geographical criteria. PARTICIPANTS: 4964 patients who had at least one consultation with their regular GP in the foregoing 12 months were included in the study. The patients were randomly selected after the selection of GPs. 2377 patients (49%) responded to the survey. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The items were assessed for missing data and ceiling effects. Factor structure was assessed using exploratory factor analyses. Reliability was tested with item–total correlation, Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest correlations. Item discriminant validity was tested by correlating items with all scales. Construct validity was assessed through associations of scale scores with health status, the patients’ general satisfaction with the services, whether the patient had been incorrectly treated by the GP and whether the patient would recommend the GP to others. RESULTS: Item missing varied from 1.0% to 3.1%, while ceiling effects varied from 16.1% to 45.9%. The factor analyses identified three factors. Reliability statistics for scales based on these three factors, and two theoretically derived scales, showed item–total correlations ranging from 0.63 to 0.85 and Cronbach’s alpha values from 0.77 to 0.93. Test–retest correlation for the five scales varied from 0.72 to 0.88. All scales had the expected association with other variables. CONCLUSIONS: The PEQ-GP has good evidence for data quality, internal consistency and construct validity. The PEQ-GP is recommended for use in local, regional and national surveys in Norway, but further studies are needed to assess the instrument’s ability to detect differences over time and between different GPs. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5640105/ /pubmed/28971964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016644 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Holmboe, Olaf
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Danielsen, Kirsten
Bjertnaes, Oyvind
The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey
title The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey
title_full The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey
title_fullStr The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey
title_full_unstemmed The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey
title_short The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey
title_sort norwegian patient experiences with gp questionnaire (peq-gp): reliability and construct validity following a national survey
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016644
work_keys_str_mv AT holmboeolaf thenorwegianpatientexperienceswithgpquestionnairepeqgpreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurvey
AT iversenhildehestad thenorwegianpatientexperienceswithgpquestionnairepeqgpreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurvey
AT danielsenkirsten thenorwegianpatientexperienceswithgpquestionnairepeqgpreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurvey
AT bjertnaesoyvind thenorwegianpatientexperienceswithgpquestionnairepeqgpreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurvey
AT holmboeolaf norwegianpatientexperienceswithgpquestionnairepeqgpreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurvey
AT iversenhildehestad norwegianpatientexperienceswithgpquestionnairepeqgpreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurvey
AT danielsenkirsten norwegianpatientexperienceswithgpquestionnairepeqgpreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurvey
AT bjertnaesoyvind norwegianpatientexperienceswithgpquestionnairepeqgpreliabilityandconstructvalidityfollowinganationalsurvey