A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews evaluating the impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review for biomedical publications highlighted that interventions were limited and have little impact. This study aims to compare the accuracy of early career peer reviewers who use an innovative o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chauvin, Anthony, Moher, David, Altman, Doug, Schriger, David L, Alam, Sabina, Hopewell, Sally, Shanahan, Daniel R, Recchioni, Alessandro, Ravaud, Philippe, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017462

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5640136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017462

Ejemplares similares